Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T12:01:49.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Error

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

B. J. Winer
B. J. Winer*
Affiliation:
Purdue University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After I had started to put some of my thoughts into a first draft for this talk, I selected “The Error” as a title. This selection gave me a great deal of flexibility since, no matter how I went wrong, I was still well within the limits of the title. After additional deliberation, I had more than a slight feeling that the title was more appropriate for a potential best-seller in the field of popular fiction than it was for a potential presidential address to this society. I have, on occasion, thought that I could write–in fact, I started my academic life in a School of Journalism. At least at the academic level, the journalistic style of writing rather quickly suppressed my interest therein as a means of making a livelihood.

Errors, random and otherwise, are often the heart of some rather undercover plots and subplots in best-sellers. But just as in the case of novels, in experimental designs errors also play a dominant role–unfortunately the experimental units, which are the players, often do not understand their roles as set forth in the design script. The latter is usually in the form of a mathematical model. A question might be raised in some instances as to whether it is more difficult to teach the experimental units what the model calls for, or to teach the designer what types of designs are potentially appropriate for expressing the behavior of experimental units, under specified experimental conditions.

Keywords

Public PolicyStatistical Theory
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , December 1968 , pp. 391 - 403
Copyright
Copyright © 1968 Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Presidential address delivered at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, San Francisco, Calif., Sept. 2, 1968.

References

Anscombe, F. J., and Tukey, J. W. The examination and analysis of residuals. Technometrics, 1963, 5, 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box, G. E. P., and Tiao, G. C. A Bayesian approach to some outlier problems. Biometrika, 1968, 55, 119–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, F. D., Sobel, E., and Watson, G. S. Linear relationships between variables affected by errors. Biometrics, 1966, 22, 252–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, W. J., and Tukey, J. W. Approximate behavior of the distribution of Winsorizedt (Trimming/Winsorization 2). Technometrics, 1968, 10, 83–98.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. Contributions to mathematical statistics. New York: Wiley, 1950, 805–813.Google Scholar
Graybill, F. A. An introduction to linear statistical models (Vol. I), New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961.Google Scholar
Madansky, A. The fitting of straight lines when both variables are subject to error. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1959, 54, 164–180.Google Scholar
Rao, C. R. Linear statistical inference and its applications, New York: Wiley, 1965.Google Scholar
Theil, H. The analysis of disturbances in regression analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1965, 60, 1067–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theil, H. A simplification of the BLUS procedure for analyzing regression disturbances. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1968, 63, 242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiao, G. C. and Guttman, I. Analysis of outliers with adjusted residuals. Technometrics, 1967, 9, 541–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tukey, J. W. Components in regression. Biometrics, 1951, 7, 33–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tukey, J. W. The future of data analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1962, 33, 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilk, M. B. and Gnanadesikan, R. Probability plotting methods for the analysis of data. Biometrika, 1968, 55, 1–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilk, M. B., Gnanadesikan, R., and Huyett, M. S. Probability plots for the gamma distribution. Technometrics, 1962, 4, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar