Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-8qdnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T10:39:09.877Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Econometrics and Psychometrics: A Survey of Communalities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Arthur S. Goldberger
Arthur S. Goldberger*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several themes which are common to both econometrics and psychometrics are surveyed. The themes are illustrated by reference to permanent income hypotheses, simultaneous equation models, adaptive expectations and partial adjustment schemes, and by reference to test score theory, factor analysis, and time-series models.

Keywords

IncomeEquation ModelPublic PolicyStatistical TheorySimultaneous Equation
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 1971 , pp. 83 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelman, I., & Morris, C. T. Society, politics, and economic development: a quantitative approach, 1967, Baltimore: John Hopkins.Google Scholar
Anderson, T. W. Some scaling models and estimation procedures in the latent class model. In Grenander, U. (Eds.), Probability and statistics: The Harald Cramér volume. New York: John Wiley. 1959, 9–38.Google Scholar
Anderson, T. W. The use of factor analysis in the statistical analysis of multiple time series. Psychometrika, 1963, 28, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T. W., & Rubin, H. Estimation of the parameters of a single equation in a complete system of stochastic equations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1949, 20, 46–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T. W., & Rubin, H. Statistical inference in factor analysis. In Neyman, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. V. Berkeley: Univ. California Press. 1956, 111–150.Google Scholar
Balestra, P., & Nerlove, M. Pooling cross section and time series data in the estimation of a dynamic model: the demand for natural gas. Econometrica, 1966, 34, 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. Economic Dynamics, 3d ed., New York: Macmillan, 1970.Google Scholar
Blalock, H. M. Jr. Multiple indicators and the causal approach to measurement error. American Journal of Sociology, 1969, 75, 264–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodkin, R. Windfall income and consumption. In Friend, I., & Jones, R. (Eds.), Consumption and saving, Volume II. Philadelphia: Univ. Pennsylvania Press. 1960, 175–187.Google Scholar
Bowles, S. Towards an educational production function. In Hansen, W. L. (Eds.), Education, income, and human capital. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research. 1970, 11–61.Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. Time series analysis: forecasting and control, 1970, San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Brown, T. M. Simultaneous least squares: a distribution free method of equation system structure estimation. International Economic Review, 1960, 1, 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, M. W. Fitting the factor analysis model. Psychometrika, 1969, 34, 375–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, G. G. Married women in the labor force: An economic analysis, 1966, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research in teaching. In Gage, N. L. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching. New York: Rand-McNally. 1963, 171–246.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. The structuring of change by P-technique and incremental R-technique. In Harris, C. W. (Eds.), Problems in measuring change. Madison: Univ. Wisconsin Press. 1963, 167–198.Google Scholar
Chow, G. C. Two methods of computing full-information maximum likelihood estimates in simultaneous stochastic equations. International Economic Review, 1968, 9, 100–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christ, C. F. Econometric models and methods, 1966, New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Costner, H. L. Theory, deduction, and rules of correspondence. American Journal of Sociology, 1969, 75, 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhrymes, P. J. Econometrics: Statistical foundations and applications, 1970, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Duesenberry, J. S., Fromm, G., Klein, L. R., & Kuh, E. The Brookings quarterly econometric model of the United States, 1965, Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. Path analysis: sociological examples. American Journal of Sociology, 1966, 72, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, O. D.. Some linear models for two-wave, two-variable panel analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 72, 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, O. D. Contingencies in constructing causal models. In Borgatta, E. F. (Eds.), Sociological Methodology 1969. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 1969, 74–112.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D., Haller, A. O., Portes, A.. Peer influences on aspirations: a reinterpretation. American Journal of Sociology, 1968, 74, 119–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisner, R. The permanent income hypothesis: comment. American Economic Review, 1958, 48, 972–990.Google Scholar
Fisher, F. M. The identification problem in econometrics, 1966, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. A theory of the consumption function, 1957, Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberger, A. S., Olkin, I. A minimum-distance interpretation of limited-information estimation. Econometrica, 1971, 39, 635–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z.. Distributed lags: a survey. Econometrica, 1967, 35, 16–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, H. H. Modern factor analysis, 2nd ed. rev., Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Hood, W. C., & Koopmans, T. C. Studies in econometric method, 1953, New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. Econometric methods, 1963, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. Statistical estimation in factor analysis: A new technique and its foundation, 1963, Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 443–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1969, 34, 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. A general method for analysis of covariance structures. Biometrika, 1970, 57, 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, B. F. Market and industry factors in stock price behavior. Journal of Business, 1966, 39, 139–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, L. R. Estimation of interdependent systems in macroeconometrics. Econometrica, 1969, 37, 171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, T. C., & Reiersøl, O.. The identification of structural characteristics. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1950, 21, 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E. Factor analysis as a statistical method, 1963, London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Liviatan, N. et al. Tests of the permanent-income hypothesis based on a reinterview savings survey. In Christ, C. F. et al (Eds.), Measurement in economics. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press. 1963, 29–66.Google Scholar
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. Statistical theory of mental test scores, 1968, Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Madansky, A. Instrumental variables in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1964, 29, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinvaud, E. Statistical methods of econometrics, 1966, Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
Mincer, J. Labor force participation of married women. National Bureau of Economic Research, Aspects of labor economics, 1962, Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Nerlove, M. et al. Distributed lags and unobserved components in economic time series. In Fellner, W. et al (Eds.), Ten economic studies in the tradition of Irving Fisher. New York: John Wiley. 1967, 127–169.Google Scholar
Pelz, D. C., & Andrews, F. M. Detecting causal priorities in panel study data. American Sociological Review, 1964, 29, 836–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, M. G. Housing and income, 1962, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reiersøl, O. On the identifiability of parameters in Thurstone's multiple factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1950, 15, 121–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothenberg, T. J., & Leenders, C. T. Efficient estimation of simultaneous equation systems. Econometrica, 1964, 32, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozelle, R. M., & Campbell, D. T. More plausible rival hypotheses in the cross-lagged panel correlation technique. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 71, 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, K. F. Some recent developments in applied econometrics: dynamic models and simultaneous equation systems. Journal of Economic Literature, 1969, 7, 771–796.Google Scholar
Watts, H. W. An objective permanent income concept for the household. Yale University: Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics Discussion Paper 99, November 1960.Google Scholar
Werts, C. E., & Linn, R. L. Path analysis: psychological examples. Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 74, 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. et al. The interpretation of multivariate systems. In Kempthorne, O. et al (Eds.), Statistics and mathematics in biology. Ames: Iowa State College Press. 1954, 11–33.Google Scholar
Zellner, A. An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1962, 57, 348–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellner, A. Estimation of regression relationships containing unobservable variables. International Economic Review, 1970, 11, 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar