Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T11:58:45.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Distribution of Chance Congruence Coefficients from Simulated Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Bruce Korth  and
Ledyard R Tucker
Bruce Korth
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago Circle
Ledyard R Tucker
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

All attempts to study the stability of factors depend on having some useful statistic that measures the degree of similarity between factors. This study attempts to provide some normative data about the distribution of one measure of similarity, the congruence coefficient, through a Monte Carlo technique. The matching of “chance” factor patterns was done by the method of Tucker. Statistical tests of the results, based on similarities of the method to canonical and multiple correlation, seemed satisfactory. The tabled results can be used as guides to the significance of congruence coefficients for some cases. The consistencies of the data indicate that a functional resolution may be possible, but none was found.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 1975 , pp. 361 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Browne, M. W.. On oblique procrustes rotation. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, M., Kristof, W.. On the oblique rotation of a factor matrix to a specified pattern. Psychometrika, 1969, 34, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, C.. Factor analysis and canonical correlations. British Journal of Psychology, Statistical Section, 1948, 1, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B.. Personality and motivation, structure and measurement, 1957, Yonkers-on-Hudson, New York: World Book.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., Baggaley, A. R.. The salient variable similary index for factor matching. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1960, 13, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cliff, N.. Orthogonal rotation to congruence. Psychometrika, 1966, 31, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. T.. Transformation of factor matrices to achieve congruence. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1971, 22, 24–48.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J.. The structure of human personality, 1953, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fiske, D.. The matching of factors. American Psychologist, 1948, 3, 360–360.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, F.. Uber Die Ahnlickeit von Faktormatrizen (The similarity of factor matrices). Psychologische Beitrage, 1968, 10, 591–599.Google Scholar
Green, B. F.. The orthogonal approximation of an oblique structure in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruvaeus, G. T.. A general approach to procrustes pattern rotation. Psychometrika, 1970, 4, 493–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P.. Personality, 1959, New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. Factorial invariance of African educational abilities and aptitudes. Educational Testing Service Research Bulletin, 1969, 69–63.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G.. General approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1969, 34, 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korth, B. A. Analytic and experimental examination of factor matching methods. Unpublished dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1973.Google Scholar
Mosier, C. I.. Determining a simple structure when loadings for certain tests are known. Psychometrika, 1939, 4, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselroade, J. R., Baltes, P. B.. On a dilemma of comparative factor analysis: A study of factor matching based on random data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1967, 27, 305–321.Google Scholar
Nesselroade, J. R., Baltes, P. B., Labouvie, E. W.. Evaluating factor invariance in oblique space: Baseline data generated from random numbers. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1971, 6, 233–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinneau, S. R., Newhouse, A.. Measures of invariance and comparability in factor analysis for fixed variables. Psychometrika, 1964, 29, 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quereshi, M. Y.. The invariance of certain ability factors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1967, 27, 803–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rock, D. A., Freeberg, N. E.. Factorial invariance of biographical factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1969, 5, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, K. A., Cattell, R. B.. Zum problem der faktoridentifikation: Verteilungun und vertauensintervalle von kongruenzkoeffizienten fur personlichkeisfaktoren im bereich objektiv-analytischer tests. Psychologische Beitrage, 1970, 12, 214–226.Google Scholar
Schönemann, P. H.. A generalized solution of the orthogonal Procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 1966, 31, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönemann, P. H., Carroll, R. M.. Fitting one matrix to another under choice of a central dilation and a rigid motion. Psychometrika, 1970, 35, 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatsuoka, M. M.. Multivariate Analysis, 1971, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R.. A method of synthesis of factor analysis studies, 1951, Washington, D. C.: Department of the Army.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrigley, C., Neuhaus, J. O.. The matching of two sets of factors, 1955, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar