Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T11:12:53.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Components of Correlation and Extensions of the Lens Model Equation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Thomas R. Stewart
Thomas R. Stewart*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Thomas R. Stewart, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80302.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

By applying a general procedure for analyzing a correlation coefficient into components, the lens model equation is extended to a) analyze the effects of different types of variation and b) analyze the relations between judgmental systems that are not based on the same set of cues.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , March 1976 , pp. 101 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH 16437. The author wishes to thank John Castellan and Derick Steinmann for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

Anderson, N. H. Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment. Psychological Review, 1970, 77, 153–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balke, W. M., Hammond, K. R., and Meyer, G. D. An alternative approach to labor-management negotiations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1973, 18, 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogartz, R. S. and Wackwitz, J. H. Transforming response measures to remove interactions or other sources of variance. Psychonomic Science, 1970, 19, 87–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogartz, R. S. and Wackwitz, J. H. Polynomial response scaling and functional measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1971, 8, 418–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellan, N. J. Jr. Comments on the “lens model” equation and the analysis of multiple-cue judgment tasks. Psychometrika, 1973, 38, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellan, N. J. Jr. The analysis of multiple criteria in multiple-cue judgment tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1972, 8, 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, H. Mathematical methods of statistics, 1946, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Deane, D. H., Hammond, K. R., and Summers, D. A. Acquisition and application of knowledge in complex inference tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 92, 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudycha, L. W., and Naylor, J. C. Characteristics of the human inference process in complex choice behavior situations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1966, 1, 110–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earle, T. C. Task learning, interpersonal learning and cognitive complexity. In Rappoport, L. and Summers, D. A. (Eds.), Human judgment and social interaction, 1973, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Einhorn, H. J. The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 73, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, L. R. Five models of clinical judgment: An empirical comparison between linear and nonlinear representations of the human inference process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1971, 6, 458–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graybill, F. A. Introduction to matrices with applications in statistics, 1969, Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc..Google Scholar
Hammond, K. R., and Brehmer, B. Quasi-rationality and distrust: Implications for international conflict. In Rappoport, L., Summers, D. A. (Eds.), Human judgment and social interaction, 1973, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Hammond, K. R., and Summers, D. A. Cognitive control. Psychological Review, 1972, 79, 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, P. J., Slovic, P., and Rorer, L. G. An analysis-of-variance model for the assessment on configural cue utilization in clinical judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 338–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hursch, C. J., Hammond, K. R., and Hursch, J. L. Some methodological considerations in multiple-cue probability studies. Psychological Review, 1964, 71, 42–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rozeboom, W. W. Comments on Professor Hammond's paper on inductive knowing. In Royce, J., Rozeboom, W. (Eds.), The psychology of knowing, 1972, London: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Slovic, P. Analyzing the expert judge: A descriptive study of a stockbroker's decision processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969, 53, 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, P. and Lichtenstein, S. Comparison of bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment. In Rappoport, L., Summers, D. A. (Eds.), Human judgment and social interaction, 1973, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R. A suggested alternative formulation in the developments by Hursch, Hammond, and Hursch, and by Hammond, Hursch, and Todd. Psychological Review, 1964, 71, 528–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed