Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T09:54:03.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comment on Birnbaum’s Three-Parameter Logistic Model in the Latent Trait Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Fumiko Samejima
Fumiko Samejima*
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Birnbaum's three-parameter logistic model for the multiple-choice item in the latent trait theory is considered with respect to the item response information function and the unique maximum condition. It is clarified that with models of knowledge or random guessing nature, which include the three-parameter logistic model, the unique maximum condition is not satisfied for the correct answer, and the item response information function is negative for the interval (− ∞, θg). It is suggested that we should use θg as a criterion in selecting optimal items for a specified group of examinees, so that we can practically avoid the possibility of non-unique maxima of the likelihood function on the response pattern given by an examinee in the group.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , June 1973 , pp. 221 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The work described in this paper was partially done while ehe author was at University of New Brunswick, Canada, in 1968-1970, supported by NRC Grant APA-345 from National Research Council of Canada.

References

Birnbaum, A. Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R. (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores, 1968, Reading, Mass.: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Lees, D. M., Wingersky, M. S., and Lord, F. M. A computer program for estimating item characteristic curve parameters using Birnbaum's three-parameter logistic model, 1972, Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing ServiceGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. An analysis of the verbal scholastic aptitude test using Birnbaum's three-parameter logistic model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1968, 28, 989–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M., and Novick, M. R. Statistical theories of mental test scores, 1968, Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Samejima, F. Application of the graded response model to the nominal response and multiple-choice situations. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: UNC Psychometric Laboratory Report, 1968, 63.Google Scholar
Samejima, F. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, 1969, No. 17.Google Scholar
Samejima, F. Syndrome response categories and information functions. Paper presented at Psychometric Society Spring Meeting, 1970, at Stanford, California.Google Scholar
Samejima, F. A general model for free-response data. Psychometrika Monograph, 1972, No. 18.Google Scholar