Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T01:22:47.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Book Review - H.M. Cooper, (2009). Research Synthesis and Meta-analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach (Applied Social Research Methods). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. 280 pages. US$42.95. ISBN: 978-1412937054

Review products

H.M. Cooper, (2009). Research Synthesis and Meta-analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach (Applied Social Research Methods). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. 280 pages. US$42.95. ISBN: 978-1412937054

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Jingyun Yang
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Joseph P. Gyekis
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cooper, H.M., & Hedges, L.V. (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Cooper, H.M. (2007). Evaluating and interpreting research synthesis in adult learning and literacy. Boston: National College Transition Network, New England Literacy Resource Center/World Education.Google Scholar
Cooper, H.M., Hedges, L.V., & Valentine, J.C. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. (2 ed.). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F.L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: correcting error and bias in research findings. (2 ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2009 151 4264269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reporting standards for research in psychology: why do we need them? What might they be? (2008). The American Psychologist, 63(9), 839–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar