Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Moon, J. W.
and
Pullman, N. J.
1970.
On Generalized Tournament Matrices.
SIAM Review,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 3,
p.
384.
TAPIERO, CHARLES S.
1972.
THE THEORY OF GRAPHS IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE*.
Decision Sciences,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 1,
p.
57.
Tapiero, Charles S.
and
Lewin, Arie Y.
1973.
THE CONCEPT AND MEASUREMENT OF CENTRALITY–AN INFORMATION APPROACH.
Decision Sciences,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 3,
p.
314.
Cowden, Dudley J.
1975.
A Method of Evaluating Contestants.
The American Statistician,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 2,
p.
82.
Hannan, Edward L.
1983.
An eigenvalue method for evaluating contestants.
Computers & Operations Research,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 1,
p.
41.
David, H. A.
and
Andrews, D. M.
1993.
Probability Models and Statistical Analyses for Ranking Data.
Vol. 80,
Issue. ,
p.
20.
Anderson, Lowell Bruce
1994.
Operations Research and The Public Sector.
Vol. 6,
Issue. ,
p.
585.
Kirkland, Steve
1995.
Spectral radii of tournament matrices whose graphs are related by an arc reversal.
Linear Algebra and its Applications,
Vol. 217,
Issue. ,
p.
179.
Kirkland, Steve
1997.
A note on perron vectors for almost regular tournament matrices.
Linear Algebra and its Applications,
Vol. 266,
Issue. ,
p.
43.
Eschenbach, Carolyn
Hall, Frank
Hemasinha, Rohan
Kirkland, Stephen
Li, Zhongshan
Shader, Bryan
Stuart, Jeffrey
and
Weaver, James
2000.
Properties of Tournaments Among Well-Matched Players.
The American Mathematical Monthly,
Vol. 107,
Issue. 10,
p.
881.
Todeschini, Roberto
Grisoni, Francesca
and
Nembri, Serena
2015.
Weighted power–weakness ratio for multi-criteria decision making.
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems,
Vol. 146,
Issue. ,
p.
329.
Leydesdorff, Loet
de Nooy, Wouter
and
Bornmann, Lutz
2017.
The Power-weakness Ratios (PWR) as a Journal Indicator: Testing the “Tournaments” Metaphor in Citation Impact Studies.
Journal of Data and Information Science,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 3,
p.
6.
Prathap, Gangan
2018.
Totalized input–output assessment of research productivity of nations using multi-dimensional input and output.
Scientometrics,
Vol. 115,
Issue. 1,
p.
577.
Prathap, Gangan
2018.
Eugene Garfield: from the metrics of science to the science of metrics.
Scientometrics,
Vol. 114,
Issue. 2,
p.
637.
Prathap, Gangan
2019.
The Pinski–Narin influence weight and the Ramanujacharyulu power-weakness ratio indicators revisited.
Scientometrics,
Vol. 119,
Issue. 2,
p.
1173.
Todeschini, Roberto
Grisoni, Francesca
and
Ballabio, Davide
2019.
Deep Ranking Analysis by Power Eigenvectors (DRAPE): A wizard for ranking and multi-criteria decision making.
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems,
Vol. 191,
Issue. ,
p.
129.
Prathap, Gangan
Mukherjee, Somenath
and
Leydesdorff, Loet
2020.
Within-journal self-citations and the Pinski-Narin influence weights.
Journal of Informetrics,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
100989.
Stamenković, Zoran
Radojčin, Milivoj
Pavkov, Ivan
Bikić, Siniša
Ponjičan, Ondrej
Bugarin, Rajko
Kovács, Sándor
and
Gere, Attila
2020.
Ranking and multicriteria decision making in optimization of raspberry convective drying processes.
Journal of Chemometrics,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 4,
Valsecchi, Cecile
Ballabio, Davide
Consonni, Viviana
and
Todeschini, Roberto
2020.
Deep Ranking Analysis by Power Eigenvectors (DRAPE): A polypharmacology case study.
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems,
Vol. 203,
Issue. ,
p.
104001.
Ujum, Ephrance Abu
Kumar, Sameer
Ratnavelu, Kuru
and
Prathap, Gangan
2021.
A new journal power-weakness ratio to measure journal impact.
Scientometrics,
Vol. 126,
Issue. 11,
p.
9051.