Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T10:08:03.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Extension of the Rasch Model for Ratings Providing Both Location and Dispersion Parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

David Andrich
David Andrich*
Affiliation:
The University of Western Australia
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Dr. David Andrich, Department of Education, The University of Western Australia, NEDLANDS, Western Australia 6009.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An elaboration of a psychometric model for rated data, which belongs to the class of Rasch models, is shown to provide a model with two parameters, one characterising location and one characterising dispersion. The later parameter, derived from the idea of a unit of scale, is also shown to reflect the shape of rating distributions, ranging from unimodal, through uniform, and then to U-shaped distributions. A brief case is made that when a rating distribution is treated as a random error distribution, then the distribution should be unimodal.

Keywords

logistic latent traitGuttman-scalethresholdsordered categories
Type
Notes and Comments
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , March 1982 , pp. 105 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, E. B. Sufficient statistics and latent trait models. Psychometrika, 1977, 42, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrich, D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 1978, 43, 561–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, R. D. Multivariate statistical methods in behavioral research, 1975, New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. A., Katti, S. K. and Coons, I. J. Optimal scaling for ordered categories. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. L. and Thurstone, L.L. An internal consistency check for scale values determined by the method of successive intervals. Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. The principle components of scalable attitudes. In Lazarsfeld, P. F. (Eds.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences, 1954, Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Haberman, S. J. Log-linear models for frequency tables with ordered classifications. Biometrics, 1974, 30, 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullagh, P. Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 1980, 2, 109–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasch, G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests, expanded edition, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Samejima, F. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometric Monograph, 1969, 34(2, whole No. 17).CrossRefGoogle Scholar