Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Samejima, Fumiko
1993.
The bias function of the maximum likelihood estimate of ability for the dichotomous response level.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 2,
p.
195.
Samejima, Fumiko
1994.
Some critical observations of the test information function as a measure of local accuracy in ability estimation.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 59,
Issue. 3,
p.
307.
Samajima, Fumiko
1994.
Estimation of Reliability Coefficients Using the Test Information Function and Its Modifications.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 3,
p.
229.
Samejima, Fumiko
1996.
Evaluation of Mathematical Models for Ordered Polychotomous Responses.
Behaviormetrika,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 1,
p.
17.
Samejima, Fumiko
1997.
Departure from normal assumptions: A promise for future psychometrics with substantive mathematical modeling.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 62,
Issue. 4,
p.
471.
Wang, Tianyou
and
Vispoel, Walter P.
1998.
Properties of Ability Estimation Methods in Computerized Adaptive Testing.
Journal of Educational Measurement,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 2,
p.
109.
Samejima, Fumiko
1998.
Efficient nonparametric approaches for estimating the operating characteristics of discrete item responses.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 2,
p.
111.
Wang, Tianyou
Hanson, Bradley A.
and
Lau, Che-Ming A.
1999.
Reducing Bias in CAT Trait Estimation: A Comparison of Approaches.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 3,
p.
263.
Pitkin, Angela K.
and
Vispoel, Walter P.
2001.
Differences Between Self‐Adapted and Computerized Adaptive Tests: A Meta‐Analysis.
Journal of Educational Measurement,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 3,
p.
235.
Wang, Shudong
and
Wang, Tianyou
2001.
Precision of Warm’s Weighted Likelihood Estimates for a Polytomous Model in Computerized Adaptive Testing.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 4,
p.
317.
Luo, Guanzhong
and
Andrich, David
2004.
Classification, Clustering, and Data Mining Applications.
p.
241.
Zhang, Jinming
2005.
BIAS CORRECTION FOR THE MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATE OF ABILITY.
ETS Research Report Series,
Vol. 2005,
Issue. 2,
p.
i.
Yousfi, Safir
2005.
Mythen und Paradoxien der klassischen Testtheorie (I).
Diagnostica,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Samejima, Fumiko
2005.
Encyclopedia of Social Measurement.
p.
145.
Penfield, Randall D.
and
Bergeron, Jennifer M.
2005.
Applying a Weighted Maximum Likelihood Latent Trait Estimator to the Generalized Partial Credit Model.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 3,
p.
218.
Sullins, D. Paul
2006.
Gender and Religion: Deconstructing Universality, Constructing Complexity.
American Journal of Sociology,
Vol. 112,
Issue. 3,
p.
838.
Zhang, Jinming
and
Lu, Ting
2007.
REFINEMENT OF A BIAS‐CORRECTION PROCEDURE FOR THE WEIGHTED LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATOR OF ABILITY.
ETS Research Report Series,
Vol. 2007,
Issue. 2,
Samejima, Fumiko
2008.
Graded response model based on the logistic positive exponent family of models for dichotomous responses.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 73,
Issue. 4,
p.
561.
Laurencelle, Louis
and
Germain, Stéphane
2011.
Les estimateurs de capacité dans la théorie des réponses aux items et leur biais.
Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 2,
p.
42.
Magis, David
Béland, Sébastien
and
Raîche, Gilles
2011.
A Test-Length Correction to the Estimation of Extreme Proficiency Levels.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 2,
p.
91.