Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T09:43:35.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Internal Consistency Check for Scale Values Determined by the Method of Successive Intervals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Allen L. Edwards  and
L. L. Thurstone
Allen L. Edwards
Affiliation:
University of Washington
L. L. Thurstone
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The method of successive intervals is a psychological scaling procedure in which stimuli are classified into successive intervals according to the degree of some defined attribute which they are judged to possess. A psychological continuum is defined and the scale values are then taken as the medians of the distributions of judgments on the psychological continuum. It is assumed that the distributions of judgments for each stimulus are normal on the psychological continuum as defined.

An internal consistency check indicates that the cumulative distributions of empirical judgments for the various stimuli can be reproduced by means of a limited number of parameters with an average error that compares favorably with that usually reported for paired comparison data. Furthermore, the scale values obtained by successive interval scaling, for the data reported, are shown to be linearly related to those obtained by the method of paired comparisons.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , June 1952 , pp. 169 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © 1952 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was written while the first author was a post-doctoral Research Training Fellow of the Social Science Research Council studying at the University of Chicago. It reports research undertaken in cooperation with the Quartermaster Food and Container Institute for the Armed Forces. The views or conclusions contained in this report are those of the authors. They are not to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views or endorsement of the Department of Defense.

References

Attneave, F. A method of graded dichotomies for the scaling of judgments. Psychol. Rev., 1949, 56, 334–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilford, J. P. Psychometric methods (pp. 231–231). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. The computation of psychological values from judgments in absolute categories. J. exp. Psychol., 1938, 22, 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hevner, K. An empirical study of three psychophysical methods. J. gen. Psychol., 1930, 4, 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffir, M. A. A comparative study of scales constructed by three psychophysical methods. Psychometrika, 1937, 2, 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Psychophysical analysis. Amer. J. Psychol., 1927, 38, 368–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. A law of comparative judgment. Psychol. Rev., 1927, 34, 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L.Unpublished study of food preferences.Google Scholar