Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Lord, Frederic M.
1975.
EVALUATION WITH ARTIFICIAL DATA OF A PROCEDURE FOR ESTIMATING ABILITY AND ITEM CHARACTERISTIC CURVE PARAMETERS1.
ETS Research Bulletin Series,
Vol. 1975,
Issue. 2,
Marco, Gary L.
1977.
ITEM CHARACTERISTIC CURVE SOLUTIONS TO THREE INTRACTABLE TESTING PROBLEMS1.
ETS Research Bulletin Series,
Vol. 1977,
Issue. 1,
Baker, Frank B.
1977.
Advances in Item Analysis.
Review of Educational Research,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 1,
p.
151.
Subkoviak, Michael J.
and
Baker, Frank B.
1977.
7: Test Theory.
Review of Research in Education,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 1,
p.
275.
HAMBLETON, RONALD K.
and
COOK, LINDA L.
1977.
LATENT TRAIT MODELS AND THEIR USE IN THE ANALYSIS OF EDUCATIONAL TEST DATA1,2,3.
Journal of Educational Measurement,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 2,
p.
75.
MARCO, GARY L.
1977.
ITEM CHARACTERISTIC CURVE SOLUTIONS TO THREE INTRACTABLE TESTING PROBLEMS1.
Journal of Educational Measurement,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 2,
p.
139.
Hambleton, Ronald K.
Swaminathan, Hariharan
Cook, Linda L.
Eignor, Daniel R.
and
Gifford, Janice A.
1978.
Developments in Latent Trait Theory: Models, Technical Issues, and Applications.
Review of Educational Research,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 4,
p.
467.
Reckase, Mark D.
1979.
Unifactor Latent Trait Models Applied to Multifactor Tests: Results and Implications.
Journal of Educational Statistics,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 3,
p.
207.
Lumsden, James
1980.
Variations on a Theme by Thurstone.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
FORSYTH, ROBERT A.
and
SPRATT, KEVIN F.
1980.
MEASURING PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY IN MATHEMATICS WITH MULTIPLE‐CHOICE ITEMS: THE EFFECT OF ITEM FORMAT ON SELECTED ITEM AND TEST CHARACTERISTICS.
Journal of Educational Measurement,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 1,
p.
31.
van der Linden, Wim J.
1981.
A Latent Trait Look at Pretest-Posttest Validation of Criterion-referenced Test Items.
Review of Educational Research,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 3,
p.
379.
Spencer, Bruce D.
1983.
Test Scores as Social Statistics: Comparing Distributions.
Journal of Educational Statistics,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
249.
Hoffman, Daniël J.
1985.
Toetsopstelling met behulp van item- en toetsinligtingskrommes.
South African Journal of Psychology,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 3,
p.
90.
Yen, Wendy M.
1985.
Increasing item complexity: A possible cause of scale shrinkage for unidimensional item response theory.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 4,
p.
399.
YEN, WENDY M.
1986.
THE CHOICE OF SCALE FOR EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT: AN IRT PERSPECTIVE.
Journal of Educational Measurement,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 4,
p.
299.
Mislevy, Robert J.
1987.
Chapter 6: Recent Developments in Item Response Theory with Implications for Teacher Certification.
Review of Research in Education,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
239.
Yen, Wendy M.
1987.
A comparison of the efficiency and accuracy of BILOG and LOGIST.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 2,
p.
275.
Stocking, Martha L.
1989.
EMPIRICAL ESTIMATION ERRORS IN ITEM RESPONSE THEORY AS A FUNCTION OF TEST PROPERTIES*.
ETS Research Report Series,
Vol. 1989,
Issue. 1,
Cliff, Norman
and
Donoghue, John R.
1992.
Ordinal test fidelity estimated by an item sampling model.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 2,
p.
217.
Zwick, Rebecca
1992.
Chapter 7: Statistical and Psychometric Issues in the Measurement of Educational Achievement Trends: Examples From the National Assessment of Educational Progress.
Journal of Educational Statistics,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 2,
p.
205.