Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T19:31:40.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Violence in stalking situations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

T. E. McEwan ,
P. E. Mullen ,
R. D. MacKenzie  and
J. R. P. Ogloff
T. E. McEwan*
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia, and Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
P. E. Mullen
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia, and Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
R. D. MacKenzie
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia
J. R. P. Ogloff
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia, and Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr T. E. McEwan, Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Monash University, Locked Bag 10, Fairfield, Victoria 3078, Australia. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Stalking is often viewed as a precursor to violence, but determining which stalkers might attack is a difficult task. This study overcomes shortfalls in previous investigations by adopting a pseudo-prospective design and examining potential risk factors for different types of stalker.

Method

Demographic, behavioural and diagnostic information was collected from stalkers referred to a community forensic mental health service (n=211). Potential risk factors for stalking violence were identified using odds ratios and χ2 tests, and entered into logistic regression models. Model utility was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves.

Results

Amongst Rejected ex-intimate stalkers, violence was best predicted by previous violence, making threats and being employed (area under the curve=0.75), while for stalkers with other motives and relationships to the victim, being aged less than 30 years, substance use at the time of stalking and prior violence best predicted stalking violence (area under the curve=0.80).

Conclusions

Stalkers at increased risk of violence can be accurately identified by examining motivational and relationship type in conjunction with specific relevant risk factors. Previous violence is a particularly important risk factor, as are threats amongst ex-intimate stalkers. Approach behaviours and psychosis were shown to be less useful in predicting violence.

Keywords

Psychosisrisk assessmentstalkingviolence
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 39 , Issue 9 , September 2009 , pp. 1469 - 1478
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

APA (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn, text revision. American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Blaauw, E, Winkel, F, Arensman, E, Sheridan, L, Freeve, A (2002). The toll of stalking. The relationship between features of stalking and psychopathology of victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 17, 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, T, Mattinson, J (2000). Stalking: Findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey. Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate: London.Google Scholar
Dawes, RM (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist 34, 571–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, RM, Corrigan, B (1974). Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin 81, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, RM, Faust, D, Meehl, PE (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science 243, 1668–1675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dressing, H, Kuehner, C, Gass, P (2005). Lifetime prevalence and impact of stalking in a European population: epidemiological data from a middle-sized German city. British Journal of Psychiatry 187, 168–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressing, H, Scheuble, B, Gass, P (2006). Stalking – a significant problem for patients and psychiatrists. British Journal of Psychiatry 189, 566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farnham, F, James, D, Cantrell, P (2000). Association between violence, psychosis and relationship to victim in stalkers. Lancet 355, 199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hathaway, SR, McKinley, JC, Butcher, JN (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, 2nd edn. University of Minnesota: Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
Hosmer, DW, Lemeshow, S (2000). Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, D, Farnham, F (2003). Stalking and serious violence. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 31, 432–439.Google ScholarPubMed
Kamphuis, J, Emmelkamp, P, Bartak, A (2003). Individual differences in post traumatic stress following post-intimate stalking: stalking severity and psychosocial variables. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 42, 145–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kropp, P, Hart, S, Lyon, D (2002). Risk assessment of stalkers: some problems and possible solutions. Criminal Justice and Behaviour 29, 590–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, R, Mullen, PE, Ogloff, JRP, McEwan, TE, James, DV (2008). Parental bonding and attachment styles in different types of stalker. Journal of Forensic Sciences 53, 1443–1449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McEwan, TE, Mullen, PE, MacKenzie, R (2007 a). Anti-stalking legislation: are we meeting community needs? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 14, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwan, TE, Mullen, PE, MacKenzie, R (2008). A study of the predictors of persistence in stalking situations. Law and Human Behavior. Published online: 15 July 2008. doi 10.1007/s10979-008-9141-0.Google ScholarPubMed
McEwan, TE, Mullen, PE, Purcell, R (2007 b). Identifying risk factors in stalking: a review of current research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 30, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIvor, RJ, Petch, E (2006). Stalking of mental health professionals: an underrecognised problem. British Journal of Psychiatry 188, 403–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meloy, J (2007). Stalking: the state of the science. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 17, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meloy, JR, James, DV, Farnham, FR, Mullen, PE, Pathé, M, Darnley, B, Preston, L (2004). A research review of public figure threats, approaches, attacks, and assassinations in the United States. Journal of Forensic Science 49, 1086–1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meloy, JR, Sheridan, L, Hoffman, J (2008). Stalking, Threatening and Attacking Public Figures. Oxford University Press: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millon, T, Millon, C, Davis, R (1994). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory, 3rd edn. National Computer Systems: Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
Mohandie, K, Meloy, J, Green-McGowan, M, Williams, J (2006). The RECON typology of stalking: reliability and validity based upon a large sample of North American stalkers. Journal of Forensic Sciences 51, 147–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, S, Anderson, S, Murray, L (2002). Stalking and Harassment in Scotland. Scottish Executive Social Research: Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Mossman, D (1994). Assessing predictions of violence: being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62, 783–792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullen, P, Pathé, M, Purcell, R, Stuart, G (1999). Study of stalkers. American Journal of Psychiatry 156, 1244–1249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullen, PE, Mackenzie, R, Ogloff, JRP, Pathé, M, McEwan, T, Purcell, R (2006). Assessing and managing the risks in the stalking situation. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 34, 439–450.Google ScholarPubMed
Palarea, R, Zona, M, Lane, J, Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J (1999). The dangerous nature of intimate relationship stalking: threats, violence, and associated risk factors. Behavioural Sciences and the Law 17, 269–283.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pathé, M, Mullen, P (1997). The impact of stalkers on their victims. British Journal of Psychiatry 170, 12–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinals, DA (2007). Stalking: classification and typology. In Stalking. Psychiatric Perspectives and Practical Approaches, pp. 27–60 (ed. Pinals, D. A.). Oxford University Press: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, R, Pathé, M, Mullen, P (2002). The prevalence and nature of stalking in the Australian community. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 36, 114–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purcell, R, Powell, M, Mullen, P (2005). Clients who stalk psychologists: prevalence, methods, and motives. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice 36, 537–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnick, P (2007). Stalking risk assessment. In Stalking. Psychiatric Perspectives and Practical Approaches, pp. 61–84 (ed. Pinals, D. A.). Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, B (2004). Violence risk factors in stalking and obsessional harassment. A review and preliminary meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behaviour 31, 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, B, Lewis, C (2005). Assessing violence risk in stalking cases: a regression tree approach. Law and Human Behavior 29, 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalora, MJ, Baumgartner, JV, Plank, GL (2003). The relationship of mental illness to targeted contact behaviour toward state government agencies and officials. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 21, 239–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, SDM, Purcell, R, Pathé, M, Mullen, PE (2008). Harm associated with stalking victimization. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 42, 800–806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tjaden, P, Thoennes, N (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. National Institute of Justice and Center for Disease Control: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Warren, LJ, MacKenzie, R, Mullen, PE, Ogloff, JRP (2005). The problem behavior model: the development of a stalkers clinic and a threateners clinic. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 23, 387–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, LJ, Mullen, PE, Thomas, SDM, Ogloff, JRP, Burgess, PM (2008). Threats to kill: a follow-up study. Psychological Medicine 38, 599–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed