Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:55:35.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validation of the Long-term Difficulties Inventory (LDI) and the List of Threatening Experiences (LTE) as measures of stress in epidemiological population-based cohort studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2012

J. G. M. Rosmalen ,
E. H. Bos  and
P. de Jonge
J. G. M. Rosmalen*
Affiliation:
Interdisciplinary Center for Psychiatric Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
E. H. Bos
Affiliation:
Interdisciplinary Center for Psychiatric Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
P. de Jonge
Affiliation:
Interdisciplinary Center for Psychiatric Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
*
*Address for correspondence: Professor J. G. M. Rosmalen, ICPE, CC72, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Stress questionnaires are included in many epidemiological cohort studies but the psychometric characteristics of these questionnaires are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to describe these characteristics for two short questionnaires measuring the lifetime and past year occurrence of stress: the List of Threatening Events (LTE) as a measure of acute stress and the Long-term Difficulties Inventory (LDI) as a measure of chronic stress.

Method

This study was performed in a general population cohort consisting of 588 females (53.7%) and 506 males (46.3%), with a mean age of 53.5 years (s.d.=11.3 years). Respondents completed the LTE and the LDI for the past year, and for the age categories of 0–12, 13–18, 19–39, 40–60, and >60 years. They also completed questionnaires on perceived stress, psychological distress (the General Health Questionnaire, GHQ-12), anxiety and depression (the Symptom Checklist, SCL-8) and neuroticism (the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire – Revised Short Scale, EPQ-RSS-N). Approximately 2 years later, 976 respondents (89%) completed these questionnaires for a second time.

Results

The stability of the retrospective reporting of long-term difficulties and life events was satisfactory: 0.7 for the lifetime LDI and 0.6 for the lifetime LTE scores. The construct validity of these lists is indicated by their positive associations with psychological distress, mental health problems and neuroticism.

Conclusions

This study in a large population-based sample shows that the LDI and LTE have sufficient validity and stability to include them in major epidemiological cohort studies.

Keywords

LTELDIquestionnairestressvalidation
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 42 , Issue 12 , December 2012 , pp. 2599 - 2608
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bebbington, PE, Tennant, C, Hurry, J (1981). Adversity and the nature of psychiatric disorder in the community. Journal of Affective Disorders 3, 345–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, GW, Harris, T (1982). Disease, distress and depression. A comment. Journal of Affective Disorders 4, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brugha, T, Bebbington, P, Tennant, C, Hurry, J (1985). The List of Threatening Experiences: a subset of 12 life event categories with considerable long-term contextual threat. Psychological Medicine 15, 189–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brugha, TS, Cragg, D (1990). The List of Threatening Experiences: the reliability and validity of a brief life events questionnaire. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 82, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chida, Y, Hamer, M (2008). Chronic psychosocial factors and acute physiological responses to laboratory-induced stress in healthy populations: a quantitative review of 30 years of investigations. Psychological Bulletin 134, 829–885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press: New York.Google Scholar
Deary, V, Chalder, T, Sharpe, M (2007). The cognitive behavioural model of medically unexplained symptoms: a theoretical and empirical review. Clinical Psychology Review 27, 781–797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, DP, Gater, R, Sartorius, N, Ustun, TB, Piccinelli, M, Gureje, O, Rutter, C (1997). The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychological Medicine 27, 191–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendriks, AAJ, Ormel, J, van de Willige, G (1990). Long-term difficulties measured by a self-report questionnaire and semi-structured interview: a comparison of methods [in Dutch]. Gedrag en Gezondheid 18, 273–283.Google Scholar
Huisman, M (2000). Imputation of missing item responses: some simple techniques. Quality and Quantity 34, 331–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, CK, Fink, P, Olesen, F (2000). Psychological distress among patients with musculoskeletal illness in general practice. Psychosomatics 41, 321–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendler, KS, Kuhn, J, Prescott, CA (2004). The interrelationship of neuroticism, sex, and stressful life events in the prediction of episodes of major depression. American Journal of Psychiatry 161, 631–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koeter, MWJ (1992). Validity of the GHQ and SCL anxiety and depression scales: a comparative study. Journal of Affective Disorders 24, 271–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leichsenring, F, Leibing, E, Kruse, J, New, AS, Leweke, F (2011). Borderline personality disorder. Lancet 377, 74–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucini, D, Norbiato, G, Clerici, M, Pagani, M (2002). Hemodynamic and autonomic adjustments to real life stress conditions in humans. Hypertension 39, 184–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ormel, J, Rosmalen, J, Farmer, A (2004). Neuroticism: a non-informative marker of vulnerability to psychopathology. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 39, 906–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paykel, ES (2003). Life events and affective disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum 418, 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto-Sietsma, SJ, Janssen, WM, Hillege, HL, Navis, G, de Zeeuw, D, de Jong, PE (2000). Urinary albumin excretion is associated with renal functional abnormalities in a nondiabetic population. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 11, 1882–1888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderman, R, Eysenck, SBG, Arrindell, WA (1991). Cross-cultural comparisons of personality: the Netherlands and England. Psychological Reports 69, 1091–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surtees, P, Wainwright, N (1998). Adversity over the life course: assessment and quantification issues. Stress Medicine 14, 205–211.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Eck, M, Berkhof, H, Nicolson, N, Sulon, J (1996). The effects of perceived stress, traits, mood states, and stressful daily events on salivary cortisol. Psychosomatic Medicine 58, 447–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yusuf, S, Hawken, S, Ounpuu, S, Dans, T, Avezum, A, Lanas, F, McQueen, M, Budaj, A, Pais, P, Varigos, J, Lisheng, L (2004). Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet 364, 937–952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed