Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:48:10.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A twin study of sex differences in social support

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2002

A. AGRAWAL ,
K. C. JACOBSON ,
C. A. PRESCOTT  and
K. S. KENDLER
A. AGRAWAL
Affiliation:
Medical College of Virginia of Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Departments of Human Genetics and Psychiatry, Richmond, VA, USA
K. C. JACOBSON
Affiliation:
Medical College of Virginia of Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Departments of Human Genetics and Psychiatry, Richmond, VA, USA
C. A. PRESCOTT
Affiliation:
Medical College of Virginia of Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Departments of Human Genetics and Psychiatry, Richmond, VA, USA
K. S. KENDLER
Affiliation:
Medical College of Virginia of Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Departments of Human Genetics and Psychiatry, Richmond, VA, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background. Social support may reduce the risk of psychiatric illness. Though perceived as an environmental measure, genetic factors may influence levels of social support. A relationship between social roles and personality with social support suggests possible sex effects on the sources of individual differences in social support.

Method. We used the responses of MZ and DZ same and opposite sex twins to 16 questions regarding their social life. Six factors – friend support, relative support, friend problem, relative problem, confidants and social integration were used for structural equation modelling. Factor derived scales were analysed for genetic, shared and unique environmental influences. Quantitative and qualitative gender differences were analysed using the software package Mx.

Results. Except for relative support and confidants, no qualitative sex differences were seen. Genetic and individual specific environmental influences accounted for the variance for friend support, friend problems, relative problems and social integration and no quantitative gender differences were seen. For relative support genetic factors were detected in females but not males, while for confidants, the shared environment was important in females but not males.

Conclusions. Except for relative support in males, genetic factors influence variation in all dimensions of social support. Shared environmental factors influence relative support and relative problems in both sexes. Sex differences were detected for confidants and relative support.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 32 , Issue 7 , October 2002 , pp. 1155 - 1164
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)