Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:43:30.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subjective well-being: genetic and environmental contributions to stability and change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2006

R. B. NES ,
E. Røysamb ,
K. TAMBS ,
J. R. HARRIS  and
T. REICHBORN-KJENNERUD
R. B. NES
Affiliation:
Division of Mental Health, The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
E. Røysamb
Affiliation:
Division of Mental Health, The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway
K. TAMBS
Affiliation:
Division of Mental Health, The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
J. R. HARRIS
Affiliation:
Division of Epidemiology, The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
T. REICHBORN-KJENNERUD
Affiliation:
Division of Mental Health, The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway Department of Psychiatry, University of Oslo, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background. Previous cross-sectional studies have found substantial genetic influences on individual variation in subjective well-being (SWB), and evidence for sex-specific genetic effects has been reported. However, the genetic and environmental influences on stability and change in SWB over time are largely unexplored.

Method. Questionnaire data on SWB from a population-based sample of Norwegian twins born 1967 to 1979, initially surveyed in 1992 (T1) and re-surveyed in 1998 (T2), were analysed using structural equation modelling to explore the relative effects of genetic and environmental influences on phenotypic stability and change.

Results. The phenotypic cross-time correlations for SWB were 0·51 and 0·49 for males and females respectively. The best-fitting longitudinal model specified only additive genetic and individual environmental effects with qualitative and quantitative sex-specific genetic influences. For both males and females, the additive genetic factors influencing SWB were largely stable, although some time-specific genetic contributions were indicated. Cross-time correlations for genetic effects were 0·85 and 0·78 for males and females respectively. The individual environmental influences were primarily time-specific. Additive genetic effects explained approximately 80% of the phenotypic cross-time correlation. For females, the magnitude of the additive genetic effects decreased significantly from T1 to T2, whereas for males, the estimates generally remained unchanged.

Conclusions. For both males and females, long-term stability of SWB was mainly attributable to stable additive genetic factors, whereas susceptibility to change was mostly related to individual environmental factors. However, both stable environmental contributions and emerging genetic influences were indicated.

Type
Original Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 36 , Issue 7 , July 2006 , pp. 1033 - 1042
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)