Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:51:20.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selective factors in memory. Part 1: age, sex and personality attributes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

W. A. Lishman
W. A. Lishman
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Material with pleasurable affective connotations has been found to be better recalled to a significant extent than material with unpleasant connotations in healthy volunteer subjects. Age, neuroticism and extraversion, but not sex, have proved to be associated with the variability which different subjects show in this regard. The implications of these results are discussed in relation to various theoretical constructs which seek to explain the interaction between personality variables and cognitive performance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , May 1972 , pp. 121 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alper, T. G. (1948). Memory for completed and incompleted tasks as a function of personality: correlation between experimental and personality data. Journal of Personality, 17, 104–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, D. M. (1938). Memory in relation to hedonic tone. Archives of Psychology, 223, 1–61.Google Scholar
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Baxter, M. F., Yamada, K., and Washburn, M. F. (1917). Directed recall of pleasant and unpleasant experiences. American Journal of Psychology, 28, 155–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebe-Center, J. G. (1932). The Psychology of Pleasantness and Unpleasantness. Van Nostrand: New York. Reprinted 1965, Russell & Russell: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, D. (1964). Repression–sensitization as a dimension of personality. In Progress in Experimental Personality Research, Vol. 1, pp. 169–220. Edited by Maher, B. A.. Academic Press: New York.Google Scholar
Corteen, R. S. (1969). Skin conductance changes and word recall. British Journal of Psychology, 60, 81–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, A. L. (1942). The retention of affective experiences —a criticism and restatement of the problem. Psychological Review, 49, 43–53.Google Scholar
Eriksen, C. W. (1954). Psychological defenses and ‘ego strength’ in the recall of completed and incompleted tasks. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 45–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksen, C. W. (1966). Cognitive responses to internally cued anxiety. In Anxiety and behavior, pp. 327–360. Edited by Spielberger, C. D.. Academic Press: New York.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. University of London Press: London.Google Scholar
Gilbert, G. M. (1937). The age difference in the hedonistic tendency in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, G. M. (1938). The new status of experimental studies on the relationship of feeling to memory. Psychological Bulletin, 35, 26–35.Google Scholar
Izard, C. E., Wehmer, G. M., Livsey, W., and Jennings, J. R. (1965). Affect, awareness, and performance. In Affect Cognition, and Personality, pp. 2–41. Edited by Tomkins, S. E., and Izard, C. E.. Springer: New York.Google Scholar
Jersild, A. (1931). Memory for the pleasant as compared with the unpleasant. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 284–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinsmith, L. J., and Kaplan, S. (1963). Paired-associate learning as a function of arousal and interpolated interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 190–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleinsmith, L. J., and Kaplan, S. (1964). Interaction of arousal and recall interval in nonsense syllable paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 124–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGeogh, J. A. (1952). The Psychology of Human Learning, 2nd edn revised by Irion, A. L.. Longmans: New York.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. University of Illinois Press: Urbana, Ill.Google Scholar
Rapaport, D. (1942). Emotions and Memory. Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, S. (1943). An experimental study of ‘repression’ with special reference to need-persistive and ego-defensive reactions to frustration. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 64–74.Google Scholar
Sharp, A. A. (1938). An experimental test of Freud's doctrine of the relation of hedonic tone to memory revival. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solley, C. M., and Murphy, G. (1960). Development of the Perceptual World. Basic Books: New York.Google Scholar
Stagner, R. (1931). The redintegration of pleasant and unpleasant experiences. American Journal of Psychology, 43, 463–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, R. H. (1930). An experimental study of memory as influenced by feeling tone. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 462–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. M. (1936). Some factors influencing recall of pleasant and unpleasant words. American Journal of Psychology, 48, 134–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. M., and Ratliff, M. McL. (1934). The relation of affective tone to the learning and recall of words. American Journal of Psychology, 46, 92–98.Google Scholar