Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T05:31:51.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The rating of symptoms by a psychiatrist and a non-psychiatrist: a study of patients referred from general practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

J. K. Wing ,
A. S. Henderson  and
Margaret Winckle
J. K. Wing*
Affiliation:
MRC Social Psychiatry Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, London, and the Social Psychiatry Research Unit, National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian National University, Canberra
A. S. Henderson
Affiliation:
MRC Social Psychiatry Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, London, and the Social Psychiatry Research Unit, National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian National University, Canberra
Margaret Winckle
Affiliation:
MRC Social Psychiatry Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, London, and the Social Psychiatry Research Unit, National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian National University, Canberra
*
1Address for correspondence: Professor J. K. Wing, MRC Social Psychiatry Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

A psychologist interviewing patients referred to the psychiatric service of a health centre rated twice as much morbidity, measured by total PSE score, as a psychiatrist interviewing equivalent patients. Scores on the self-rated GHQ showed no difference between the 2 groups. It is suggested that such differences could be avoided by giving careful attention to training interviewers.

Type
Brief Communication
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , November 1977 , pp. 713 - 715
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cooper, J. E., Copeland, J., Brown, G. W., Harris, T. & Gourlay, A. J. (1977). Further studies on interviewer training and inter-rater reliability of the Present State Examination. Psychological Medicine, 7, 517–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Copeland, J., Kelleher, M. J., Gourlay, A. J. & Smith, A. M. R. (1975). Influence of psychiatric training, medical qualification and paramedical training on the rating of abnormal behaviour. Psychological Medicine 5, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Henderson, S., Duncan-Jones, P., McAuley, H. & Ritchie, K. (1977). The patient's primary group. Accepted for publication.Google Scholar
Von Cranach, M. & Jablensky, A. (1972). Some sources of disagreement in the observation and assessment of psychomotor behaviour. (In Bulgarian, with an English summary.) Nevrologija, Psikiatrija, Nevrokirurgija (Sofia) 11, 194–200.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E. & Sartorius, N. (1974). Description and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms. Cambridge Univerity Press: London.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Nixon, J. M., Mann, S. A. & Leff, J. P. (1977). Reliability of the PSE (9th edn) used in a population survey. Psychological Medicine 7, 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar