Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T09:15:25.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neuropsychological evidence of reductions on left frontal tests with hypnosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

John Gruzelier  and
Kristen Warren
John Gruzelier*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Neuro-Psychophysiology, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, London
Kristen Warren
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Neuro-Psychophysiology, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, London
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr John Gruzelier, Laboratory of Neuro-Psychophysiology. Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, St Dunstan's Road, London W6 8RF.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Individuals with high and low susceptibility to hypnosis were compared in a baseline condition and after instructions of hypnosis on tests of anterior left and right hemispheric functions – word fluency to letter categories, word fluency to semantic categories, design fluency and bilateral finger tapping dexterity. With hypnosis high susceptibles showed a reduction in word generation to letter categories, no significant change in word generation to semantic categories, an improvement in design fluency, and bilateral reductions in finger tapping dexterity. Low susceptibles showed the opposite changes except for the improvement in design fluency. These results, together with correlational results, were interpreted as evidence of central inhibitory processes, particularly of the left hemisphere, in response to instructions of hypnosis in high susceptibles.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , February 1993 , pp. 93 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annett, M. (1970). A classification of hand preference by association analysis. British Journal of Psychology 61, 303–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakan, P. (1969). Hypnotizability, laterality of eye movements and functional brain asymmetry. Perceptual and Motor Skills 28, 927–932.Google Scholar
Barber, T. X. & Wilson, F. C. (1978). The Barber Suggestibility Scale and the Creative Imagination Scale: experimental and clinical applications. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 21, 84–87.Google Scholar
Benton, A. L. (1968). Differential behavioural effects in frontal lobe disease. Neuropsychologia 6, 53–60.Google Scholar
Boronski, J. G., Benton, A. L. & Spreen, O. (1967). Word fluency and brain damage. Neuropsychologia 5, 135–140.Google Scholar
Cikurel, K. & Gruzelier, J. (1990). The effect of an active-alert hypnotic induction on lateral asymmetry and haptic processing. British Journal of Clinical Experimental Hypnosis 7, 17–25.Google Scholar
Crawford, H. J. (1989). Cognitive and physiological flexibility: multiple pathways to hypnotic responsiveness. In Suggestion and Suggestibility: Theory and Research (ed. Ghorghui, V., Netter, P., Eysenck, H. and Rosenthal, R.), pp. 155–168. Springer: New York.Google Scholar
Crawford, K. J. (1990). Cold pressor pain with and without suggested analgesia: EEG correlates as moderated by hypnotic susceptibility level.Paper presented at the 5th International Congress of Psychophysiology,Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
Crawford, H. J. & Allen, S. N. (1983). Enhanced visual memory during hypnosis as mediated by hypnotic responsiveness and cognitive strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology 112, 662–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crawford, H. J. & Gruzelier, J. H. (1992). A midstream view of the psychoneurophysiology of hypnosis: recent research and future directions. In Hypnosis: Research Developments and Perspectives, 3rd edn. (ed. Fromm, E. and Nash, M.), pp. 227–266. Guilford Press: New York.Google Scholar
Foenander, G. & Burrows, G. D. (1979). Bilateral alpha activity in hypnosis. In Hypnosis (ed. Burrows, G. D. & Collinson, ), pp. 319–334. Elsevier: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Frumkin, L. R., Ripley, H. S. & Cox, G. B. (1978). Changes in cerebral hemispheric lateralization with hypnosis. Biological Psychiatry 13, 741–750.Google ScholarPubMed
Gevins, A. S., Morgan, N. H., Bressler, S. L., Cutillo, B. I. A., White, R. M., Illes, J., Greer, D. S., Doyle, J. C. & Zeitlin, G. M. (1987). Human neuroelectric patterns predict performance accuracy. Science 235, 580–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, K. R. (1977). Perceptual processes and hypnosis: support for a cognitive-state theory based on laterality. In Conceptual and Investigative Approaches to Hypnosis and Hypnotic Phenomena (ed. Edmonston, W. E. Jr), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 296, 274–283.Google Scholar
Gruzelier, J. H. (1988). The neuropsychology of hypnosis. In Hypnosis: Current Clinical, Experimental and Forensic Practices (ed. Heap, M.), pp. 68–76. Croom Helm: London.Google Scholar
Gruzelier, J. H. (1990). Neuropsychological investigations of hypnosis: cerebral laterality and beyond. In Hypnosis: Theory, Research and Clinical Practice (ed. Van Dyck, R., Spinhoven, P. H. and Van der Does, A. J. W.), pp. 38–51. Free University Press: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Gruzelier, J. H. & Brow, T. D. (1985). Psychophysiological evidence for a state theory of hypnosis and susceptibility. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 29, 287–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gruzelier, J. H. & Venables, P. H. (1972). Skin conductance orienting activity in a heterogeneous sample of schizophrenics: possible evidence of limbic dysfunction. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 155, 277–287.Google Scholar
Gruzelier, J. H., Brow, T. D., Perry, A., Rhonder, J. & Thomas, M. (1984). Hypnotic susceptibility: a lateral pre-disposition and altered cerebral asymmetry under hypnosis. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruzelier, J., Thomas, M., Conway, A., Liddiard, D., Jutai, J., McCormack, K., Perry, A., Rhonder, J. & Brow, T. (1987). Involvement of the left hemisphere in hypnotic induction: electrodermal, haptic, electro-cortical and divided visual-field evidence. Advances in Biological Psychiatry 16, 6–17.Google Scholar
Gruzelier, J., Liddiard, D., Davis, L. & Wilson, L. (1988). Topographical mapping of electrocortical activity in schizophrenia during directed non-focused attention, recognition memory and motor programming. In Functional Brain Imaging (ed. Pfurtscheller, G. and da Silva, F. H. Lopes), pp. 181–186. Hans Huber: Toronto.Google Scholar
Gruzelier, J. H., Hancock, J. & Maggs, R. (1991). EEG topography together with recognition memory for words and faces endorse lateralised changes with instructions of hypnosis. International Journal of Psychophysiology 11, 36.Google Scholar
Gur, R. C. & Gur, R. E. (1974). Handedness, sex and eyedness as moderating variables in the relation between hypnotic susceptibility and functional brain asymmetry. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 83, 635–643.Google Scholar
Jones-Gotman, M. & Milner, B. (1977). Design fluency: the invention of nonsense drawings after focal cortical lesions. Neuropsychologia 15, 653–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luria, A. R. (1973). The Working Brain. Penguin Press: London.Google Scholar
McCormack, A. R. & Gruzelier, J. (1993). Cerebral asymmetry and hypnosis: a signal detection analysis of divided visual-field stimulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology (in the press).Google Scholar
Morgan, A. H., Macdonald, H. & Hilgard, E. R. (1974). EEG alpha: lateral asymmetry related to task and hypnotizability. Psychophysiology 11, 275–285.Google Scholar
Newcombe, F. (1969). Missile Wounds of the Brain. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Pedersen, P. L. (1984). Hypnosis and the right hemisphere. Proceedings of the British Society of Medical and Dental Hypnosis 5, 2–14.Google Scholar
Reitan, R. M. & Davison, L. A. (1974). Clinical Neuropyschology: Current Status and Applications. Winston-Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
Sarbin, T. R. (1972). Hypnosis: a Social Psychological Analysis of Influence Communication. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York.Google Scholar
Shor, R. E. & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
Spanos, N. P., Pavlak, A. E., Mah, C. D. & D'Eon, J. L. (1980). Lateral eye-movements, hypnotic susceptibility and imaginal ability in right handers. Perceptual Motor Skills 50, 287–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weitzenhoffer, A. M. & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). The Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale Forms A and C. Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar