Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:27:52.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Letter to the Editor: Electrode placement in electroconvulsive therapy – bilateral is still the ‘gold standard’ for some patients: a reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2017

E. Kolshus*
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
A. Jelovac
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
D. M. McLoughlin
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
*
*Address for correspondence: E. Kolshus, Ph.D., MRCPsych, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. (Email: [email protected])

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borenstein, M (2009). Introduction to Meta-analysis. Wiley: Oxford.Google Scholar
Kellner, CH, Cicek, M, Ables, JL (2016). Electrode placement in electroconvulsive therapy – bilateral is still the ‘gold standard’ for some patients [Letter]. Psychological Medicine. doi:10.1017/S0033291716003536.Google Scholar
Kellner, CH, Knapp, R, Husain, MM, Rasmussen, K, Sampson, S, Cullum, M, McClintock, SM, Tobias, KG, Martino, C, Mueller, M, Bailine, SH, Fink, M, Petrides, G (2010). Bifrontal, bitemporal and right unilateral electrode placement in ECT: randomised trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 196, 226234.Google Scholar
Kolshus, E, Jelovac, A, McLaughlin, DM (2017). Bitemporal v. high-dose right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychological Medicine 47, 518530.Google Scholar
McCall, WV, Reboussin, DM, Weiner, RD, Sackeim, HA (2000). Titrated moderately suprathreshold vs fixed high-dose right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy: acute antidepressant and cognitive effects. Archives of General Psychiatry 57, 438444.Google Scholar
McLoughlin, DM (2016). Response to Kellner and Farber: addressing crossover of high-dose right unilateral ECT to bitemporal ECT. American Journal of Psychiatry 173, 731732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group (2011). The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653).Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM (2005). External validity of randomised controlled trials: ‘to whom do the results of this trial apply?’ Lancet 365, 8293.Google Scholar
Sackeim, HA, Prudic, J, Devanand, DP, Kiersky, JE, Fitzsimons, L, Moody, BJ, McElhiney, MC, Coleman, EA, Settembrino, JM (1993). Effects of stimulus intensity and electrode placement on the efficacy and cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy. New England Journal of Medicine 328, 839846.Google Scholar
Sackeim, HA, Prudic, J, Devanand, DP, Nobler, MS, Lisanby, SH, Peyser, S, Fitzsimons, L, Moody, BJ, Clark, J (2000). A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bilateral and right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy at different stimulus intensities. Archives of General Psychiatry 57, 425434.Google Scholar
Semkovska, M, Landau, S, Dunne, R, Kolshus, E, Kavanagh, A, Jelovac, A, Noone, M, Carton, M, Lambe, S, McHugh, C, McLoughlin, DM (2016). Bitemporal versus high-dose unilateral twice-weekly electroconvulsive therapy for depression (EFFECT-Dep): a pragmatic, randomized, non-inferiority trial. American Journal of Psychiatry 173, 408417.Google Scholar
Sibbald, B, Roland, M (1998). Understanding controlled trials. Why are randomised controlled trials important? British Medical Journal 316, 201.Google Scholar