Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:36:31.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of prior expectations on facial expression discrimination in schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2012

G. Barbalat*
Affiliation:
UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, London, UK
M. Rouault
Affiliation:
Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, France
N. Bazargani
Affiliation:
UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, London, UK
S. Shergill
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Downing Site, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
S.-J. Blakemore
Affiliation:
UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, London, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr G. Barbalat, UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK. (Email: [email protected])

Abstract

Background

Belief inflexibility is a thinking style observed in patients with schizophrenia, in which patients tend to refute evidence that runs counter to their prior beliefs. This bias has been related to a dominance of prior expectations (prior beliefs) over incoming sensory evidence. In this study we investigated the reliance on prior expectations for the processing of emotional faces in schizophrenia.

Method

Eighteen patients with schizophrenia and 18 healthy controls were presented with sequences of emotional (happy, fearful, angry or neutral) faces. Perceptual decisions were biased towards a particular expression by a specific instruction at the start of each sequence, referred to as the context in which stimuli occurred. Participants were required to judge the emotion on each face and the effect of the context on emotion discrimination was investigated.

Results

For threatening emotions (anger and fear), there was a performance cost for facial expressions that were incongruent with, and perceptually close to, the expression named in the instruction. For example, for angry faces, participants in both groups made more errors and reaction times (RTs) were longer when they were asked to look out for fearful faces compared with the other contexts. This bias against sensory evidence that runs counter to prior information was stronger in the patients, evidenced by a group by context interaction in accuracy and RTs for anger and fear respectively.

Conclusions

Overall, the present data suggest an overdependence on prior expectations for threatening stimuli, reflecting belief inflexibility, in schizophrenia.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Averbeck, BB, Evans, S, Chouhan, V, Bristow, E, Shergill, SS (2011). Probabilistic learning and inference in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 127, 115122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbalat, G, Chambon, V, Franck, N, Koechlin, E, Farrer, C (2009). Organization of cognitive control within the lateral prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry 66, 377386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barch, DM, Carter, CS, Braver, TS, Sabb, FW, MacDonald, A 3rd, Noll, DC, Cohen, JD (2001). Selective deficits in prefrontal cortex function in medication-naive patients with schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry 58, 280288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackwood, NJ, Howard, RJ, Bentall, RP, Murray, RM (2001). Cognitive neuropsychiatric models of persecutory delusions. American Journal of Psychiatry 158, 527539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carré, JM, Morrissey, MD, Mondloch, CJ, McCormick, CM (2010). Estimating aggression from emotionally neutral faces: which facial cues are diagnostic? Perception 39, 356377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, CS, MacDonald, AW, Ross, LL, Stenger, VA (2001). Anterior cingulate cortex activity and impaired self-monitoring of performance in patients with schizophrenia: an event-related fMRI study. American Journal of Psychiatry 158, 14231428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, CS, Mintun, M, Nichols, T, Cohen, JD (1997). Anterior cingulate gyrus dysfunction and selective attention deficits in schizophrenia: [15O]H2O PET study during single-trial Stroop task performance. American Journal of Psychiatry 154, 16701675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambon, V, Franck, N, Koechlin, E, Fakra, E, Ciuperca, G, Azorin, J, Farrer, C (2008). The architecture of cognitive control in schizophrenia. Brain 131, 962970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dayan, P, Hinton, GE, Neal, RM, Zemel, RS (1995). The Helmholtz machine. Neural Computation 7, 889904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dosher, BA, Lu, ZL (1999). Mechanisms of perceptual learning. Vision Research 39, 31973221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, S, Shergill, SS, Chouhan, V, Bristow, E, Collier, T, Averbeck, BB (2011). Patients with schizophrenia show increased aversion to angry faces in an associative learning task. Psychological Medicine 41, 14711479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, PC, Frith, CD (2009). Perceiving is believing: a Bayesian approach to explaining the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Nature Reviews . Neuroscience 10, 4858.Google Scholar
Freeman, D (2007). Suspicious minds: the psychology of persecutory delusions. Clinical Psychology Review 27, 425457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garety, PA, Freeman, D, Jolley, S, Dunn, G, Bebbington, PE, Fowler, DG, Kuipers, E, Dudley, R (2005). Reasoning, emotions, and delusional conviction in psychosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 114, 373384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garety, PA, Hemsley, DR, Wessely, S (1991). Reasoning in deluded schizophrenic and paranoid patients. Biases in performance on a probabilistic inference task. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 179, 194201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemsley, DR (2005). The schizophrenic experience: taken out of context? Schizophrenia Bulletin 31, 4353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henik, A, Salo, R (2004). Schizophrenia and the Stroop effect. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 3, 4259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, SR, Fiszbein, A, Opler, LA (1987). The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 13, 261276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerns, JG, Cohen, JD, MacDonald, AW 3rd, Johnson, MK, Stenger, VA, Aizenstein, H, Carter, CS (2005). Decreased conflict- and error-related activity in the anterior cingulate cortex in subjects with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 162, 18331839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krabbendam, L, O'Daly, O, Morley, LA, van Os, J, Murray, RM, Shergill, SS (2009). Using the Stroop task to investigate the neural correlates of symptom change in schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry 194, 373374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, MB, Chapman, JP, Chapman, LJ, Collins, J (1995). Task difficulty and cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 104, 251258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moritz, S, Woodward, TS (2005). Jumping to conclusions in delusional and non-delusional schizophrenic patients. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 44, 193207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moritz, S, Woodward, TS (2006). A generalized bias against disconfirmatory evidence in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research 142, 157165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, S, Lee, J, Folley, B, Kim, J (2003). Schizophrenia: putting context in context. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26, 9899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pessoa, L (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 9, 148158.Google Scholar
Servan-Schreiber, D, Cohen, JD, Steingard, S (1996). Schizophrenic deficits in the processing of context. A test of a theoretical model. Archives of General Psychiatry 53, 11051112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephan, KE, Friston, KJ, Frith, CD (2009). Dysconnection in schizophrenia: from abnormal synaptic plasticity to failures of self-monitoring. Schizophrenia Bulletin 35, 509527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Summerfield, C, Egner, T (2009). Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13, 403409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Summerfield, C, Egner, T, Greene, M, Koechlin, E, Mangels, J, Hirsch, J (2006). Predictive codes for forthcoming perception in the frontal cortex. Science 314, 13111314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Summerfield, C, Koechlin, E (2008). A neural representation of prior information during perceptual inference. Neuron 59, 336347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tottenham, N, Tanaka, JW, Leon, AC, McCarry, T, Nurse, M, Hare, TA, Marcus, DJ, Westerlund, A, Casey, BJ, Nelson, C (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research 168, 242249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). Harcourt Assessment: San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Wessely, S, Buchanan, A, Reed, A, Cutting, J, Everitt, B, Garety, P, Taylor, PJ (1993). Acting on delusions. I: Prevalence. British Journal of Psychiatry 163, 6976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodberry, KA, Giuliano, AJ, Seidman, LJ (2008). Premorbid IQ in schizophrenia: a meta-analytic review. American Journal of Psychiatry 165, 579587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodward, TS, Buchy, L, Moritz, S, Liotti, M (2007). A bias against disconfirmatory evidence is associated with delusion proneness in a nonclinical sample. Schizophrenia Bulletin 33, 10231028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, TS, Moritz, S, Cuttler, C, Whitman, JC (2006). The contribution of a cognitive bias against disconfirmatory evidence (BADE) to delusions in schizophrenia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 28, 605617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodward, TS, Moritz, S, Menon, M, Klinge, R (2008). Belief inflexibility in schizophrenia. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 13, 267277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed