Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:57:41.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Group therapy for people with bulimia nervosa: systematic review and meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2013

A. Polnay ,
V. A. W. James ,
L. Hodges ,
G. D. Murray ,
C. Munro  and
S. M. Lawrie
A. Polnay*
Affiliation:
Edinburgh Psychotherapy Department, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, UK Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
V. A. W. James
Affiliation:
Scottish Mental Health Research Network, Kennedy Tower, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
L. Hodges
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
G. D. Murray
Affiliation:
Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, UK
C. Munro
Affiliation:
Anorexia Nervosa Intensive Treatment Team, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
S. M. Lawrie
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, UK Scottish Mental Health Research Network, Kennedy Tower, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, UK MRF/MRC CRTF Programme for Mental Health (‘PsySTAR’), Kennedy Tower, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: A. Polnay, Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Kennedy Tower, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh EH10 5HF, UK. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Approximately 25% of people with bulimia nervosa (BN) who undertake therapy are treated in groups. National guidelines do not discriminate between group and individual therapy, yet each has potential advantages and disadvantages and it is unclear how their effects compare. We therefore evaluated how group therapy for BN compares with individual therapy, no treatment, or other therapies, in terms of remission from binges and binge frequency.

Method

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of group therapies for BN, following standard guidelines.

Results

A total of 10 studies were included. Studies were generally small with unclear risk of bias. There was low-quality evidence of a clinically relevant advantage for group cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) over no treatment at therapy end. Remission was more likely with group CBT versus no treatment [relative risk (RR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62–0.96]. Mean weekly binges were lower with group CBT versus no treatment (2.9 v. 6.9, standardized mean difference = −0.56, 95% CI −0.96 to −0.15). One study provided low-quality evidence that group CBT was inferior compared with individual CBT to a clinically relevant degree for remission at therapy end (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03–1.50); there was insufficient evidence regarding frequency of binges.

Conclusions

Conclusions could only be reached for CBT. Low-quality evidence suggests that group CBT is effective compared with no treatment, but there was insufficient or very limited evidence about how group and individual CBT compared. The risk of bias and imprecise estimates of effect invite further research to refine and increase confidence in these findings.

Keywords

Bulimia nervosacognitive behavioural therapygroup therapysystematic review
Type
Review Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 44 , Issue 11 , August 2014 , pp. 2241 - 2254
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

APA (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn, text revision. American Psychiatric Publishing: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Atkins, D, Best, D, Briss, PA, Eccles, M, Falck-Ytter, Y, Flottorp, S, Guyatt, GH, Harbour, RT, Haugh, MC, Henry, D, Hill, S, Jaeschke, R, Leng, G, Liberati, A, Magrini, N, Mason, J, Middleton, P, Mrukowicz, J, O'Connell, D, Oxman, AD, Phillips, B, Schünemann, HJ, Edejer, T, Varonen, H, Vist, GE, Williams, JW Jr, Zaza, S; GRADE Working Group (2004). Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) 328, 1490.Google Scholar
Bushnell, JA, Wells, JE, McKenzie, JM, Hornblow, AR, Oakley-Browne, MA, Joyce, PR (1994). Bulimia comorbidity in the general population and in the clinic. Psychological Medicine 24, 605–611.Google Scholar
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2009). Systematic Reviews: CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York: York.Google Scholar
Chen, E, Touyz, SW, Beumont, PJV, Fairburn, CG, Griffiths, R, Butow, P, Russell, J, Schotte, DE, Gertler, R, Basten, C (2003). Comparison of group and individual cognitive–behavioral therapy for patients with bulimia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders 33, 241–254; discussion 255–256.Google Scholar
Crow, SJ, Agras, WS, Halmi, KA, Fairburn, CG, Mitchell, JE, Nyman, JA (2013). A cost effectiveness analysis of stepped care treatment for bulimia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders 46, 302–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairburn, CG, Cooper, PJ (1982). Self-induced vomiting and bulimia nervosa: an undetected problem. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition) 284, 1153–1155.Google Scholar
Favaro, A, Ferrara, S, Santonastaso, P (2003). The spectrum of eating disorders in young women: a prevalence study in a general population sample. Psychosomatic Medicine 65, 701–708.Google Scholar
Freeman, C, Sinclair, F, Turnbull, J, Annandale, A (1985). Psychotherapy for bulimia: a controlled study. Journal of Psychiatric Research 19, 373–378.Google Scholar
Freeman, CP, Barry, F, Dunkeld-Turnbull, J, Henderson, A (1988). Controlled trial of psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) 296, 521–525.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, PE, Lin, E, Goering, P, Spegg, C, Goldbloom, DS, Kennedy, S, Kaplan, AS, Woodside, DB (1995). Bulimia nervosa in a Canadian community sample: prevalence and comparison of subgroups. American Journal of Psychiatry 152, 1052–1058.Google Scholar
Hay, PP, Bacaltchuk, J, Stefano, S, Kashyap, P (2009). Psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa and binging. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4. Art no.: CD000562. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000562.pub3.Google Scholar
Higgins, J, Green, S (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011] (http://www.cochrane-handbook.org). Accessed October 2013.Google Scholar
Huntley, AL, Araya, R, Salisbury, C (2012). Group psychological therapies for depression in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry 200, 184–190.Google Scholar
Keel, PK (2004). Review: individual psychotherapy may be an effective treatment for people with bulimia nervosa. Evidence Based Mental Health 7, 11.Google Scholar
Keski-Rahkonen, A, Hoek, HW, Linna, MS, Raevuori, A, Sihvola, E, Bulik, CM, Rissanen, A, Kaprio, J (2009). Incidence and outcomes of bulimia nervosa: a nationwide population-based study. Psychological Medicine 39, 823–831.Google Scholar
Kirkley, BG, Schneider, JA, Agras, WS, Bachman, JA (1985). Comparison of two group treatments for bulimia. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 53, 43–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laessle, RG, Waadt, S, Pirke, KM (1987). A structured behaviorally oriented group treatment for bulimia nervosa. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 48, 141–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavender, A, Startup, H, Naumann, U, Samarawickrema, N, Dejong, H, Kenyon, M, van den Eynde, F, Schmidt, U (2012). Emotional and social mind training: a randomised controlled trial of a new group-based treatment for bulimia nervosa. PLoS ONE 7, e46047.Google Scholar
Lee, NF, Rush, AJ (1986). Cognitive–behavioral group therapy for bulimia. International Journal of Eating Disorders 5, 599–615.3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leichsenring, F, Rabung, S (2008). Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association 300, 1551–1565.Google Scholar
Leitenberg, H, Rosen, JC, Gross, J, Nudelman, S, Vara, LS (1988). Exposure plus response-prevention treatment of bulimia nervosa. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 56, 535–541.Google Scholar
Mahon, J (2000). Dropping out from psychological treatment for eating disorders: what are the issues? European Eating Disorders Review 8, 198–216.Google Scholar
Mitchell, JE, Agras, S, Crow, S, Halmi, K, Fairburn, CG, Bryson, S, Kraemer, H (2011). Stepped care and cognitive–behavioural therapy for bulimia nervosa: randomised trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 198, 391–397.Google Scholar
Mitchell, JE, Peterson, CB, Agras, S (1999). Cost-effectiveness of psychotherapy for eating disorders. In Cost-Effectiveness of Psychotherapy: A Guide for Practitioners, Researchers and Policy Makers (ed. Miller, N. E.), pp. 270–278. Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
Morrison, N (2001). Group cognitive therapy: treatment of choice or sub-optimal option? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 29, 311–332.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2004). CG9 Eating Disorders: NICE Guideline. NICE: London.Google Scholar
Nevonen, L, Broberg, AG (2006). A comparison of sequenced individual and group psychotherapy for patients with bulimia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders 39, 117–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newton, JT, Robinson, PH, Hartley, P (1993). Treatment for eating disorders in the United Kingdom. Part II. Experiences of treatment: a survey of members of the Eating Disorders Association. European Eating Disorders Review 1, 10–21.Google Scholar
Polivy, J, Federoff, I (1997). Group psychotherapy. In Handbook of Treatment for Eating Disorders, 2nd edn (ed Garner, D. and Garfinkel, P.), pp. 462–475. Guilford Press: New York.Google Scholar
Rosenvinge, JH, Klusmeier, AK (2000). Treatment for eating disorders from a patient satisfaction perspective: a Norwegian replication of a British study. European Eating Disorders Review 8, 293–300.Google Scholar
Schmidt, U, Andiappan, M, Grover, M, Robinson, S, Perkins, S, Dugmore, O, Treasure, J, Landau, S, Eisler, I, Williams, C (2008). Randomised controlled trial of CD-ROM-based cognitive–behavioural self-care for bulimia nervosa. British Journal of Psychiatry 193, 493–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sundgot-Borgen, J, Rosenvinge, JH, Bahr, R, Schneider, LS (2002). The effect of exercise, cognitive therapy, and nutritional counseling in treating bulimia nervosa. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 34, 190–195.Google Scholar
Thompson-Brenner, H, Glass, S, Westen, D (2003). A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 10, 269–287.Google Scholar
Tucker, M, Oei, TPS (2007). Is group more cost effective than individual cognitive behaviour therapy? The evidence is not solid yet. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 35, 77–91.Google Scholar
Von Ranson, KM, Robinson, KE (2006). Who is providing what type of psychotherapy to eating disorder clients? A survey. International Journal of Eating Disorders 39, 27–34.Google Scholar
Wolf, EM, Crowther, JH (1992). An evaluation of behavioral and cognitive–behavioral group interventions for the treatment of bulimia nervosa in women. International Journal of Eating Disorders 11, 3–15.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yalom, ID, Leszcz, M (2005). The therapist: working in the here-and-now. In Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, 5th revised edn (ed. Yalom, I. D. and Leszcz, M.), pp. 172–173. Basic Books: New York.Google Scholar
Yates, AJ, Sambrailo, F (1984). Bulimia nervosa: a descriptive and therapeutic study. Behaviour Research and Therapy 22, 503–517.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Polnay et al. Supplementary Material

Table and Figures

Download Polnay et al. Supplementary Material(File)
File 63 KB