Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:14:17.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of out-patient counselling compared with general practitioner care following overdoses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Keith Hawton*
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford
Steve McKeown
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford
Alexandra Day
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford
Pauline Martin
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford
Marianne O'Connor
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford
Jackie Yule
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr Keith Hawton, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX.

Synopsis

In a randomized prospective treatment study, 80 overdose patients (not requiring intensive psychiatric intervention) received either brief out-patient counselling or were returned to the care of their general practitioners with advice on management. There was little difference in outcome between the two groups. However, two sub-groups of patients benefited more from out-patient counselling than from general practitioner care, these were: (a) women, and (b) patients with dyadic problems. Counselling following overdoses should be focused on groups of patients such as these who are most likely to benefit from it. Further work is needed to identify treatment approaches that will help other groups who take overdoses, especially men.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Clinical, Experimental and Theoretical Aspects. Harper and Row: New York.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H. & Mendelson, M (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 4, 561571.Google Scholar
Beck, R. W., Morris, J. B. & Beck, A. T. (1974 a). Cross-validation of the suicidal intent scale. Psychological Reports 34, 445446.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Schuyler, D. & Herman, I. (1974 b). Development of suicidal intent scales. In The Prediction of Suicide. (ed. Beck, A. T., Resnick, H. L. P. & Lettieri, D. J.), pp. 4556. Charles Press: New York.Google Scholar
Buglass, D. & Horton, J. (1974). A scale for predicting subsequent suicidal behaviour. British Journal of Psychiatry 124, 573578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catalan, J, Marsack, P., Hawton, K. E., Whitwell, D., Fagg, J. & Bancroft, J. H J. (1980). Comparison of doctors and nurses in the assessment of deliberate self-poisoning patients. Psychological Medicine 10, 483491.Google Scholar
Central and Scottish Health Services Councils (1968). Hospital Treatment of Acute Poisoning HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, N., Hicks, R. C. & Kreitman, N. (1973). Evaluation of an aftercare service for parasuicide (attempted suicide) patients. Social Psychiatry 36, 6781.Google Scholar
Cooper, P., Osborn, M., Gath, D. & Feggetter, G. (1982). Evaluation of a modified self-report measure of social adjustment. British Journal of Psychiatry 141, 6878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbons, J. L. (1979) The Southampton Parasuicide Project: Report to the D.H.S.S. Southampton University Department of Psychiatry: Southampton.Google Scholar
Gibbons, J. S., Butler, J., Urwin, P. & Gibbons, J. L. (1978). Evaluation of a social work service for self-poisoning patients. British Journal of Psychiatry 133, 111118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, D. P. & Hillier, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine 9, 139145.Google Scholar
Hawton, K. & Catalan, J. (1987). Attempted Suicide: A Practical Guide to its Nature and Management, (Second edition). Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Hawton, K. & Rose, N. (1986). Unemployment and attempted suicide among men in Oxford City. Health Trends 18, 2932.Google Scholar
Hawton, K., Gath, D. & Smith, E. (1979). The management of attempted suicide patients in Oxford. British Medical Journal ii, 10401042.Google Scholar
Hawton, K., Bancroft, J. H. J., Catalan, J., Kingston, B., Stedeford, A. & Welch, N. (1981). Domiciliary and out-patient treatment of self-poisoning patients by medical and non-medical staff. Psychological Medicine 11, 169177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HN (84) 25 (1984) The Management of Deliberate Self-harm. Department of Health and Social Security: London.Google Scholar
Holding, T. A., Buglass, D., Duffy, J. C. & Kreitman, N. (1977). Parasuicide in Edinburgh– seven year review 1968–74. British Journal of Psychiatry 130, 534543.Google Scholar
Newson-Smith, J. G. B. & Hirsch, S. R. (1979). A comparison of social workers and psychiatrists in evaluating parasuicide. British Journal of Psychiatry 134, 335342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Platt, S. & Kreitman, N. (1984). Trends in parasuicide and unemploy–ment among men in Edinburgh, 1968–82 British Medical Journal 289, 10291032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, S., Hawton, K., Fagg, J. & Kreitman, N. Trends in parasuicide in Edinburgh and Oxford, 19761984. (In preparation).Google Scholar
Weissman, M. M. & Paykel, E. S. (1974). The Depressed Woman: A Study of Social Relationships. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar
Wexler, L., Weissman, M. M. & Kasl, A. V. (1978). Suicide attempts 1970–75: up–dating a United States study and comparisons with international trends. British Journal of Psychiatry 132, 180185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar