Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:47:34.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The etiology of social aggression: a nuclear twin family study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2018

Brooke L. Slawinski Open the ORCID record for Brooke L. Slawinski [Opens in a new window] ,
Kelly L. Klump Open the ORCID record for Kelly L. Klump [Opens in a new window]  and
S. Alexandra Burt Open the ORCID record for S. Alexandra Burt [Opens in a new window]
Brooke L. Slawinski
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, 107B Psychology Building, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
Kelly L. Klump
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, 107B Psychology Building, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
S. Alexandra Burt*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, 107B Psychology Building, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
*
Author for correspondence: S. Alexandra Burt, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Social aggression is a form of antisocial behavior in which social relationships and social status are used to damage reputations and inflict emotional harm on others. Despite extensive research examining the prevalence and consequences of social aggression, only a few studies have examined its genetic–environmental etiology, with markedly inconsistent results.

Method

We estimated the etiology of social aggression using the nuclear twin family (NTF) model. Maternal-report, paternal-report, and teacher-report data were collected for twin social aggression (N = 1030 pairs). We also examined the data using the classical twin (CT) model to evaluate whether its strict assumptions may have biased previous heritability estimates.

Results

The best-fitting NTF model for all informants was the ASFE model, indicating that additive genetic, sibling environmental, familial environmental, and non-shared environmental influences significantly contribute to the etiology of social aggression in middle childhood. However, the best-fitting CT model varied across informants, ranging from AE and ACE to CE. Specific heritability estimates for both NTF and CT models also varied across informants such that teacher reports indicated greater genetic influences and father reports indicated greater shared environmental influences.

Conclusions

Although the specific NTF parameter estimates varied across informants, social aggression generally emerged as largely additive genetic (A = 0.15–0.77) and sibling environmental (S = 0.42–0.72) in origin. Such findings not only highlight an important role for individual genetic risk in the etiology of social aggression, but also raise important questions regarding the role of the environment.

Keywords

Behavior geneticsetiologynuclear twin familyrelational aggressionsocial aggressiontwins
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 162 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akaike, H (1987) Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika 52, 317–332.10.1007/BF02294359Google Scholar
Allison, PD (2003) Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 112, 545–557.Google Scholar
Archer, J and Coyne, SM (2005) An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review 101, 212–230.10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_2Google Scholar
Brendgen, M, Boivin, M, Vitaro, F, Bukowski, WM, Dionne, G, Tremblay, RE et al. (2008) Linkages between children's and their friends’ social and physical aggression: evidence for a gene-environment interaction? Child Development 79, 13–29.Google Scholar
Brendgen, M, Dionne, G, Girard, A, Boivin, M, Vitaro, F and Pérusse, D (2005) Examining genetic and environmental effects on social aggression: a study of 6-year-old twins. Child Development 76, 930–946.Google Scholar
Burt, SA (2009) Rethinking environmental contributions to child and adolescent psychopathology: a meta-analysis of shared environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin 135, 608–637.10.1037/a0015702Google Scholar
Burt, SA and Donnellan, MB (2009) Development and validation of the subtypes of antisocial behavior questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior 35, 376–398.10.1002/ab.20314Google Scholar
Burt, SA and Donnellan, MB (2010) Evidence that the Sub-Types of Antisocial Behavior Questionnaire (STAB) predicts momentary reports of acting-out behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences 48, 917–920.10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.021Google Scholar
Burt, SA, Donnellan, MB and Tackett, JL (2012) Should social aggression be considered ‘antisocial’? Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 34, 153–163.10.1007/s10862-011-9267-0Google Scholar
Burt, SA and Klump, KL (2013) The Michigan State University Twin Registry (MSUTR): an update. Twin Research and Human Genetics 16, 344–350.10.1017/thg.2012.87Google Scholar
Burt, SA, Klump, KL, Gorman-Smith, D and Neiderhiser, JM (2016) Neighborhood disadvantage alters the origins of children's non-aggressive conduct problems. Clinical Psychological Science 4, 511–526.Google Scholar
Burt, SA and Neiderhiser, JM (2009) Aggressive versus non-aggressive antisocial behavior: distinctive etiological moderation by age. Developmental Psychology 45, 1164–1176.Google Scholar
Card, NA, Stucky, BD, Sawalani, GM and Little, TD (2008) Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development 79, 1185–1229.Google Scholar
Crick, NR, Casas, JF and Nelson, DA (2002) Toward a more comprehensive understanding of peer maltreatment: studies of relational victimization. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11, 98–101.10.1111/1467-8721.00177Google Scholar
Crick, NR and Grotpeter, JK (1995) Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development 66, 710–722.Google Scholar
Crick, NR, Ostrov, JM, Burr, JE, Cullerton-Sen, C, Jansen-Yeh, E and Ralston, P (2006) A longitudinal study of relational and physical aggression in preschool. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 27, 254–268.10.1016/j.appdev.2006.02.006Google Scholar
Crick, NR, Ostrov, JM and Kawabata, Y (2007) Relational aggression and gender: an overview. In Flannery, DJ, Vazsonyi, AT and Waldman, ID (eds). The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior and Aggression. New York: Cambridge University, pp. 245–259.Google Scholar
Croy, CD and Novins, DK (2005) Methods for addressing missing data in psychiatric and developmental research. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 44, 1230–1240.10.1097/01.chi.0000181044.06337.6fGoogle Scholar
Forbes, G, Zhang, X, Doroszewicz, K and Haas, K (2009) Relationships between individualism-collectivism, gender, and direct or indirect aggression: a study in China, Poland, and the U.S. Aggressive Behavior 35, 24–30.Google Scholar
Gentile, DA, Coyne, S and Walsh, DA (2011) Media violence, physical aggression, and relational aggression in school-age children: a short-term longitudinal study. Aggressive Behavior 37, 193–206.Google Scholar
Izquierdo-Sotorrío, E, Holgado-Tello, FP and Carrasco, MA (2016) Incremental validity and informant effect from a multi-method perspective: assessing relations between parental acceptance and children's behavioral problems. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 664.Google Scholar
Karriker-Jaffe, KJ, Foshee, VA, Ennett, ST and Suchindran, C (2008) Associations of neighborhood and family factors with trajectories of physical and social aggression during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 42, 861–877.Google Scholar
Kawabata, Y, Alink, LRA, Tseng, WL, van Ijzendoorn, MH and Crick, NR (2011) Maternal and parental parenting styles associated with relational aggression in children and adolescents: a conceptual analysis and meta-analytic review. Developmental Review 31, 240–273.10.1016/j.dr.2011.08.001Google Scholar
Keller, MC and Coventry, WL (2005) Quantifying and addressing parameter indeterminacy in the classical twin design. Twin Research and Human Genetics 8, 201–213.Google Scholar
Keller, MC and Medland, SE (2008). Evaluation of the cascade model – a new extended twin family model. Paper presented at the Behavioral Genetics Association: Louisville, KY.Google Scholar
Keller, MC, Medland, SE and Duncan, LE (2010) Are extended twin family designs worth the trouble? A comparison of the bias, precision, and accuracy of parameters estimated in four twin family models. Behavior Genetics 40, 377–393.Google Scholar
Klump, KL and Burt, SA (2006) The Michigan State University Twin Registry (MSUTR): genetic, environmental, and neurobiological influences on behavior across development. Twin Research and Human Genetics 9, 971–977.Google Scholar
Kuppens, S, Grietens, H, Onghena, P, Michiels, D and Subramanian, SV (2013) Relations between parental psychological control and childhood relational aggression: reciprocal in nature? Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 38, 117–131.Google Scholar
Neale, MC, Boker, SM, Xie, G and Maes, HH (2003) Mx: Statistical Modeling. VCU Box 900126, Richmond, VA 23298: Department of Psychiatry, 6th Edition.Google Scholar
Peeters, H, Gestel, SV, Vlietinck, R, Derom, C and Derom, R (1998) Validation of a telephone zygosity questionnaire in twins of known zygosity. Behavior Genetics 28, 159–163.10.1023/A:1021416112215Google Scholar
Raftery, AE (1995) Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology 25, 111–163.Google Scholar
Sclove, LS (1987) Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika 53, 333–343.Google Scholar
Sijtsema, JJ, Ojanen, T, Veenstra, R, Lindenberg, S, Hawley, PH and Little, TD (2010) Forms and functions of aggression in adolescent friendship selection and influence: a longitudinal social network analysis. Social Development 19, 514–534.Google Scholar
Spiegelhalter, DJ, Best, NG, Carlin, BP and Van Der Linde, A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 64, 583–639.Google Scholar
Tackett, JL, Waldman, ID and Lahey, BB (2009) Etiology and measurement of relational aggression: a multi-informant behavior genetic investigation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 118, 722–733.Google Scholar
Trompetter, H, Scholte, R and Westerhof, G (2011) Resident-to-resident relational aggression and subjective well-being in assisted living facilities. Aging & Mental Health 15, 59–67.Google Scholar
Underwood, MK, Beron, KJ and Rosen, LH (2009) Continuity and change in social and physical aggression from middle childhood through early adolescence. Aggressive Behavior 35, 357–375.10.1002/ab.20313Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, T, Miller, JL, Fagbemi, J, Côte, S and Tremblay, RE (2007) Trajectories and predictors of indirect aggression: results from a nationally representative longitudinal study of Canadian children aged 2–10. Aggressive Behavior 33, 314–326.10.1002/ab.20202Google Scholar
Werner, NE and Crick, NR (2004) Maladaptive peer relationships and the development of relational and physical aggression during middle childhood. Social Development 13, 495–514.10.1111/j.1467-9507.2004.00280.xGoogle Scholar
Yeung, RS and Leadbeater, BJ (2007) Does hostile attributional bias for relational provocations mediate the short-term association between relational victimization and aggression in preadolescence? Journal of Youth and Adolescence 36, 973–983.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Slawinski et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S4 and Appendix 1

Download Slawinski et al. supplementary material(File)
File 24.8 KB