Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T04:50:57.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethno-psychometric evaluation of the General Health Questionnaire in rural China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2005

DOMINIC T. S. LEE ,
WINNIE C. M. YIP ,
YENFONG CHEN ,
QINGYUE MENG  and
ARTHUR KLEINMAN
DOMINIC T. S. LEE
Affiliation:
Department of Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
WINNIE C. M. YIP
Affiliation:
Department of Population and International Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
YENFONG CHEN
Affiliation:
Hui Long Guan Hospital, Beijing, China
QINGYUE MENG
Affiliation:
Centre for Health Management and Policy, Shandong University, Shandong, China
ARTHUR KLEINMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background. Most mental health research tools are developed in Western, urban contexts. Few studies have evaluated the applicability of these research tools in rural populations of non-Western countries. We examined the cultural acceptance and psychometric performance of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) in China's rural villages.

Method. Ethnographic investigations were conducted to assess the cultural applicability of self-report rating scales among villagers. This was followed by a survey of 1401 rural residents, randomly selected from 48 villages of Shandong province using stratified multistage cluster sampling. The respondents were administered the GHQ and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI).

Results. The GHQ, when administered by trained interviewers, was culturally acceptable to rural residents. The scale had good psychometric properties in the study population. The area under the curve was 0·86. At a cut-off of 1/2, the sensitivity and specificity were 80·6% and 79·3% respectively.

Conclusions. The ethno-psychometric evaluation showed that the GHQ was both culturally valid and psychometrically sound in the Chinese rural context.

Type
Original Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , February 2006 , pp. 249 - 255
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)