Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T23:18:56.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dialectical behaviour therapy v. mentalisation-based therapy for borderline personality disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2018

Kirsten Barnicot Open the ORCID record for Kirsten Barnicot [Opens in a new window]  and
Mike Crawford Open the ORCID record for Mike Crawford [Opens in a new window]
Kirsten Barnicot*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, Centre for Psychiatry, Commonwealth Building, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
Mike Crawford
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, Centre for Psychiatry, Commonwealth Building, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Kirsten Barnicot, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) and mentalisation-based therapy (MBT) are both widely used evidence-based treatments for borderline personality disorder (BPD), yet a head-to-head comparison of outcomes has never been conducted. The present study therefore aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of DBT v. MBT in patients with BPD.

Methods

A non-randomised comparison of clinical outcomes in N = 90 patients with BPD receiving either DBT or MBT over a 12-month period.

Results

After adjusting for potentially confounding differences between participants, participants receiving DBT reported a significantly steeper decline over time in incidents of self-harm (adjusted IRR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.87–0.99, p = 0.02) and in emotional dysregulation (adjusted β = −1.94, 95% CI −3.37 to −0.51, p < 0.01) than participants receiving MBT. Differences in treatment dropout and use of crisis services were no longer significant after adjusting for confounding, and there were no significant differences in BPD symptoms or interpersonal problems.

Conclusions

Within this sample of people using specialist personality disorder treatment services, reductions in self-harm and improvements in emotional regulation at 12 months were greater amongst those receiving DBT than amongst those receiving MBT. Experimental studies assessing outcomes beyond 12 months are needed to examine whether these findings represent differences in the clinical effectiveness of these therapies.

Keywords

Behaviour therapyborderline personality disorderpsychodynamic therapypsychological treatment
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 49 , Issue 12 , September 2019 , pp. 2060 - 2068
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Ansell, EB, Sanislow, CA, McGlashan, TH and Grilo, CM (2007) Psychosocial impairment and treatment utilization by patients with borderline personality disorder, other personality disorders, mood and anxiety disorders, and a healthy comparison group. Comprehensive Psychiatry 48, 329–336.Google Scholar
Barnicot, K, Katsakou, C, Marougka, C and Priebe, S (2011) Treatment completion in psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 123, 327–338.Google Scholar
Barnicot, K, Gonzalez, R, McCabe, R and Priebe, S (2016) Skills use and common treatment processes in dialectical behaviour therapy for borderline personality disorder. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 52, 147–156.Google Scholar
Bateman, A and Fonagy, P (1999) The effectiveness of partial hospitalisation in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a randomised controlled trial. American Journal of Psychiatry 156, 1563–1569.Google Scholar
Bateman, A and Fonagy, P (2006) Mentalization-Based Treatment for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bateman, A and Fonagy, P (2009) Randomized controlled trial of outpatient mentalization based treatment versus structured clinical management for borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry 166, 1355–1364.Google Scholar
Bernstein, EM and Putnam, FW (1986) Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 174, 727–735.Google Scholar
Behavioral Tech (2017) About us: Our Impact. Behavioral Tech: Seattle. Available at https://behavioraltech.org/about-us/our-impact/ (Accessed 8 January 2018).Google Scholar
Clarkin, JF, Levy, KN, Lenzenweger, MF and Kernberg, OF (2007) Evaluating three treatments for borderline personality disorder: a multiwave study. American Journal of Psychiatry 164, 922–928.Google Scholar
Cristea, IA, Gentili, C, Cotet, CD, Palomba, D, Barbui, C and Cuijpers, P (2017). Efficacy of psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of American Medical Association Psychiatry 74, 319–328.Google Scholar
Dale, O, Sethi, F, Stanton, C, Evans, S, Barnicot, K, Sedgwick, R, Goldsack, S, Doran, M, Shoolbred, L, Samele, C, Urquia, N, Haigh, R and Moran, P (2017) Personality disorder services in England: findings from a national survey. British Journal of Psychiatry Bulletin 41, 247–253.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, JD, Fonagy, P, Pilling, S, Jones, A, Wildgoose, A and Bebbington, PE (2012) A real-world study of the effectiveness of DBT in the UK National Health Service. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 51, 121–141.Google Scholar
First, MB, Gibbon, M, Spitzer, RL, Williams, JBW and Benjamin, LS (1997) Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders, (SCID-II). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press Inc.Google Scholar
First, MB, Spitzer, RL, Miriam, G and Williams, JBW (2002) Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition (SCID-I/P). New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
Gratz, KL and Roemer, L (2004) Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 26: 41–54.Google Scholar
Herman, JL, Perry, JC and van der Kolk, BA (1989) Childhood trauma in borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry 146, 490–495.Google Scholar
Landes, SJ, Chalker, SA and Comtois, KA (2016) Predicting dropout in outpatient dialectical behaviour therapy with patients with borderline personality disorder receiving psychiatric disability. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotional Dysregulation 3, 9.Google Scholar
Linehan, MM (1993 a) Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Linehan, MM (1993 b) Skills Training Manual for Treating Borderline Personality Disorder. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Linehan, MM (1996) Instructions for use of Suicide Attempt Self-Injury Interview. Available at http://depts.washington.edu/uwbrtc/wp-content/uploads/SASII-Instructions-For-Published-SASII.pdfGoogle Scholar
Linehan, MM, Armstrong, HE, Suarez, A, Allmon, D and Heard, HL (1991) Cognitive-behavioral treatment of chronically para-suicidal borderline patients. Archives of General Psychiatry 48, 1060–1064.Google Scholar
Linehan, MM, Comtois, KA, Brown, MZ, Heard, HL and Wagner, A (2006 a) Suicide attempt self-injury interview (SASII): development, reliability, and validity of a scale to assess suicide attempts and intentional self-injury. Psychological Assessment 18, 303–312.Google Scholar
Linehan, MM, Comtois, KA, Murray, AM, Brown, MZ, Gallop, RJ, Heard, HL, Korslund, KE, Tutek, DA, Reynolds, SK and Lindenboim, N (2006 b) Two-year randomized controlled trial and follow-up of dialectical behaviour therapy versus therapy by experts for suicidal behaviours and borderline personality disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry 63, 757–766.Google Scholar
Maffei, C, Fossati, A, Agostoni, I, Barraco, A, Bagnato, M, Deborah, D, Namia, C, Novella, L and Petrachi, M (1997) Interrater reliability and internal consistency of the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders (SCID-II), version 2.0. Journal of Personality Disorders 11, 9–84.Google Scholar
McMurran, M, Huband, N and Overton, E (2010) Non-completion of personality disorder treatments: a systematic review of correlates, consequences, and interventions. Clinical Psychology Review 30, 277–287.Google Scholar
Neacsiu, AD, Rizvi, SL and Linehan, MM (2010) Dialectical behavior therapy skills use as a mediator and outcome of treatment for borderline personality disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy 48, 832–839.Google Scholar
Pelcovitz, D, van der Kolk, B, Roth, S, Mandel, F, Kaplan, S and Resick, P (1997) Development of a criteria set and Structured Interview for Disorders of Extreme Stress (SIDES). Journal of Traumatic Stress 10, 3–16.Google Scholar
Pfohl, B, Blum, N, St. John, D, McCormick, B, Allen, J and Black, DW (2009) Reliability and validity of the Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time (BEST): a self-rated scale to measure severity and change in persons with borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders 23, 281–293.Google Scholar
Priebe, S, Bhatti, N, Barnicot, K, Bremner, S, Gaglia, A, Katsakou, C, Molosankwe, I, McCrone, P and Zinkler, M (2012) Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of dialectical behaviour therapy for self-harming patients with personality disorder: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 81, 356–365.Google Scholar
Sheehan, DV, Lecrubier, Y, Sheehan, KH, Janavs, J, Weiller, E, Keskiner, A, Schinka, J, Knapp, E, Sheehan, MF and Dunbar, GC (1997) The validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) according to the SCID-P and its reliability. European Psychiatry 5, 232–241.Google Scholar
Sheehan, DV, Lecrubier, Y, Sheehan, KH, Amorim, P, Janavs, J, Weiller, E, Hergueta, T, Baker, R and Dunbar, GC (1998) The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 59, 22e33.Google Scholar
Skre, I, Onstad, S, Torgersen, S and Kringlen, E (1991) High interrater reliability for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Axis I (SCID-I). Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 84, 167–173.Google Scholar
StataCorp (2015) STATA/SE, version14. StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
Sterne, JAC, White, IR, Carlin, JB, Spratt, M, Royston, P, Kenward, MG, Wood, AM and Carpenter, JR (2009) Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. British Medical Journal 338, b239.Google Scholar
Stoffers, JM, Völlm, BA, Rücker, G, Timmer, A, Huband, N and Lieb, K (2012) Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 8, CD005652.Google Scholar
University College London (2014) Mentalization-based therapy: improving treatment for patients with borderline personality disorders. UCL Impact Statements: London. Available at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/impact/case-study-repository/mentalization-based-therapy (Accessed 5 January 2018).Google Scholar
Van der Kolk, B (2002) Structured Interview for Disorders of Extreme Stress Not Otherwise Specified – Self Report Version. Brookline, MA: The Trauma Center, Justice Resource Institute.Google Scholar
van Ijzendoorn, MH and Schuengel, C (1996) The measurement of dissociation in normal and clinical populations: meta-analytic validation of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES). Clinical Psychology Review 16, 365–382.Google Scholar
Wampold, BE (2001) The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models, Methods and Findings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Zanarini, MC, Skodol, AE, Bender, D, Dolan, R, Sanislow, C, Schaefer, E, Morey, LC, Grilo, CM, Shea, MT, McGlashan, TH and Gunderson, JG (2000) The collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study: reliability of axis I and II diagnoses. Journal of Personality Disorders 14, 291–299.Google Scholar
Zinkler, M, Gaglia, A, Arokiadass, SMR and Farhy, E (2007) Dialectical behaviour treatment: implementation and outcomes. Psychiatric Bulletin 31, 249–252.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Barnicot and Crawford supplementary material

Table S1

Download Barnicot and Crawford supplementary material(File)
File 17.2 KB