Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T02:55:29.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A critique of biological psychiatry1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Bruce G. Charlton
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , February 1990 , pp. 3 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

References

Bernard, C. (1865). An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Mendicine. (Translated by Green, Henry Copley, 1957.) Dover: New York.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophysiology: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind–Brain. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Guze, S. B. (1989). Biological Psychiatry: is there any other kind? Psychological Medicine 19, 315–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kandel, E. R. & Schwartz, J. H. (eds.) (1985). Principles of Neural Science, 2nd. edn.Elsevier: New York.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
McGilchrist, I. K. (1987). I think, therefore I … British Medical Journal 296, 1201.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. C. (1989). An open mind. Nature 339, 25–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism. Harvester: Brighton.Google Scholar
Rose, S. P. R. (1987). Molecules and Minds. Open University Press: Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Shallice, T. (1989). From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure. Cambridge University Press: CambridgeGoogle Scholar