Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:53:18.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The common cold, pattern sensitivity and contrast sensitivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Andrew P. Smith*
Affiliation:
Health Psychology Research Unit, School of Psychology, University of Wales College of Cardiff; MRC Common Cold Unit, Salisbury; MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge
David A. J. Tyrrell
Affiliation:
Health Psychology Research Unit, School of Psychology, University of Wales College of Cardiff; MRC Common Cold Unit, Salisbury; MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge
G. Ian Barrow
Affiliation:
Health Psychology Research Unit, School of Psychology, University of Wales College of Cardiff; MRC Common Cold Unit, Salisbury; MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge
Peter G. Higgins
Affiliation:
Health Psychology Research Unit, School of Psychology, University of Wales College of Cardiff; MRC Common Cold Unit, Salisbury; MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge
Susan Bull
Affiliation:
Health Psychology Research Unit, School of Psychology, University of Wales College of Cardiff; MRC Common Cold Unit, Salisbury; MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge
Susan Trickett
Affiliation:
Health Psychology Research Unit, School of Psychology, University of Wales College of Cardiff; MRC Common Cold Unit, Salisbury; MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge
Arnold J. Wilkins
Affiliation:
Health Psychology Research Unit, School of Psychology, University of Wales College of Cardiff; MRC Common Cold Unit, Salisbury; MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr A. P. Smith, Health Psychology Research Unit, School of Psychology, University of Wales College of Cardiff, PO Box 901, Cardiff, CF1 3YG.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Results from two studies involving challenge with respiratory syncytial viruses showed that volunteers who developed colds were more sensitive to a visually distracting pattern presented prior to virus challenge than were volunteers who did not get a cold. Volunteers with sub-clinical infections reported more illusions after virus challenge than they had done before, whereas uninfected volunteers and those with colds tended to report fewer illusions on the second test. These effects did not occur when volunteers were challenged with either a coronavirus or rhinovirus. Overall, the results confirm that behavioural measures may be related to susceptibility to subsequent illness, and that viral infections may influence visual perception. They also show that the effects vary according to the nature of the infecting agent, which agrees with results from studies looking at other aspects of behaviour.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

References

Beare, A. S. & Reed, S. E. (1977). The study of antiviral compounds in volunteers. In Chemoprophylaxis and Virus Infections, Vol. II (ed. Oxford, J. S.), pp. 2759. CRC Press: Cleveland.Google Scholar
Broadbent, D. E., Broadbent, M. H. P., Phillpotts, R. & Wallace, J. (1984). Some further studies on the prediction of experimental colds in volunteers by psychological factors. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 28, 511523.Google ScholarPubMed
Cohen, S. & Williamson, G. M. (1991). Stress and infectious disease in humans. Psychological Bulletin 109, 524.Google ScholarPubMed
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T. & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 24, 385396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nulty, D. D., Wilkins, A. J. & Williams, J. M. G. (1987). Mood, pattern sensitivity and headache: a longitudinal study. Psychological Medicine 17, 705713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. P. (1990). Respiratory virus infections and performance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 327, 519528.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. P., Tyrrell, D. A. J., Coyle, K. B. & Willman, J. S. (1987). Selective effects of minor illnesses on human performance. British Journal of Psychology 78, 183188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. P., Tyrrell, D. A. J., Al-Nakib, W., Coyle, K. B., Donovan, C. B., Higgins, P. G. & Willman, J. S. (1988). The effects of experimentally-induced respiratory virus infections on performance. Psychological Medicine 18, 6571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. P., Tyrrell, D. A. J., Barrow, G. I., Higgins, P. G., Willman, J. S., Bull, S., Coyle, K. B. & Trickett, S. (1992). Mood and experimentally-induced respiratory virus infections. Psychology and Health 6, 205212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, A. (1986). Visual function. Optician 192 (5054), 1314.Google Scholar
Wilkins, A. J. & Robson, J. G.Cambridge Low Contrast Gratings. Clement Clarke International Ltd: London.Google Scholar
Wilkins, A. J., Binnie, C. D. & Darby, C. E. (1980). Visually-induced seizures. Progress in Neurobiology 15, 85117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkins, A., Nimmo-Smith, I., Tait, A., McManus, C., Della Sala, S., Tilley, A., Arnold, K., Barrie, M. & Scott, S. (1984). A neurological basis for visual discomfort. Brain 107, 9891017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkins, A. J., Della Sala, S., Somazzi, L. & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1988). Age-related norms for the Cambridge Low Contrast Gratings, including details concerning their design and use. Clinical Vision Sciences 2, 201212.Google Scholar