Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T20:47:19.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Awareness of body dimensions during pregnancy: an analogue study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

P. D. Slade
P. D. Slade*
Affiliation:
Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr P. D. Slade, Academic Department of Psychiatry, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, Pond St, London NW3 2QC.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Two alternative explanations of the body-image abnormality in anorexia nervosa patients are outlined: namely, the ‘abnormal sensitivity’ and ‘adaptational failure’ hypotheses. Evidence relating to these 2 conflicting hypotheses was obtained from body-perception measurements carried out on groups of pregnant women.

In the first study 40 pregnant women, at approximately 4 months' duration, were found to overestimate their bodily dimensions, albeit to a lesser extent than the previously tested group of anorexia nervosa patients (Slade & Russell, 1973a). When they were subdivided on the basis of a history of weight change over the previous 12 months, the ‘stable weight’ subgroup was found to overestimate significantly more than the ‘weight gain’ and ‘weight loss’ subgroups.

In a second study 16 of the original group of pregnant women were retested at approximately 8 months' duration. Although their weight and bodily dimensions had increased on retesting, their tendency to overestimate was found to be significantly reduced.

It was concluded that the phenomenon of body-image disorder is not specific to anorexia nervosa, extending not only to patients with obesity and to some normal women, but also to women during pregnancy. Moreover, the ‘abnormal sensitivity’ hypothesis was considered to fit these and other recently accumulated data better than the alternative ‘adaptational failure’ hypothesis. Some of the theoretical and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , May 1977 , pp. 245 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Button, E., Fransella, F. & Slade, P. D. (1977). A reappraisa of body perception disturbance in anorexia nervosαl. Psychological Medicine, 7, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, A. H. (1965). Some aspects of the evolution, presentation and follow-up of anorexia nervosa. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 58, 814–820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crisp, A. H. & Kalucy, R. S. (1974). Aspects of the perceptual disorder in anorexia nervosa. British Journal of Medical Psychology 47, 349–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crisp, A. H. & Stonehill, E. (1971). Relation between aspects of nutritional disturbance and menstrual activity. British Medical Journal iii, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, C. Y. (1956). Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics 12, 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, H. G. & Russell, G. F. M. (1975). Value of family background as predictors of long-term outcome in anorexia nervosa: four year follow-up study of 41 patients. Psychological Medicine 5, 355–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slade, P. D. & Russell, G. F. M. (1973 a). Awareness of body dimensions in anorexia nervosa: cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Psychological Medicine 3, 188–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slade, P. D. & Russell, G. F. M. (1973 b). Experimental investigations of bodily perception in anorexia nervosa and obesity. In Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (ed. Ruesch, J. & Schmale, A. H.), pp. 359–363. S. Karger: Basel.Google Scholar