Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:01:55.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attribution style and psychosis: evidence for an externalizing bias in patients but not in individuals at high risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2006

I. JANSSEN ,
D. VERSMISSEN ,
J. À. CAMPO ,
I. MYIN-GERMEYS ,
J. VAN OS  and
L. KRABBENDAM
I. JANSSEN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, SEARCH, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
D. VERSMISSEN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, SEARCH, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
J. À. CAMPO
Affiliation:
Mondriaan Zorggroep, Section Social Cognition, Heerlen, The Netherlands
I. MYIN-GERMEYS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, SEARCH, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands Mondriaan Zorggroep, Section Social Cognition, Heerlen, The Netherlands
J. VAN OS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, SEARCH, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, UK
L. KRABBENDAM
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, SEARCH, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background. The aims of the study were to investigate whether (i) patients with lifetime presence of non-affective psychosis show an external-personal attribution bias for negative events, (ii) this attribution style can also be detected in first-degree relatives of patients with psychosis and subjects with subclinical psychotic experiences, and (iii) this attribution style is related to the presence of psychotic symptoms, in particular delusions.

Method. Participants were 23 patients with lifetime presence of non-affective psychosis, a high- risk group of 36 first-degree relatives of patients with non-affective psychosis, a high-risk group of 31 subjects with subclinical psychotic experiences and 46 normal controls. Attribution style was measured by the Internal, Personal and Situational Attribution Questionnaire. Positive symptoms were assessed with the Present State Examination (PSE) and the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS).

Results. Relative to the controls, an externalizing bias was apparent in the patient group (β=0·20, p=0·03) but not in the two high-risk groups. There was a dose–response association between externalizing bias and the delusions subscale of the PSE (relative to lowest level: highest level of delusions: β=0·53, p=0·04; intermediate levels of delusions: β=0·23, p=0·35). No significant differences were found in personalizing bias between the four groups.

Conclusions. Patients with psychosis tend to use an externalizing bias in their explanations of negative social events, and this bias is associated with the presence of positive psychotic symptoms, in particular delusions. A deviant attribution style is not part of the vulnerability to psychosis.

Type
Original Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 36 , Issue 6 , June 2006 , pp. 771 - 778
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)