Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:37:29.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Allusive thinking, the Word Halo and verbosity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

M. S. Armstrong  and
N. McConaghy
M. S. Armstrong*
Affiliation:
New South Wales Institute of Psychiatry and The School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales
N. McConaghy
Affiliation:
New South Wales Institute of Psychiatry and The School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales
*
1Address for correspondece: Dr M. S. Armstrong, Psychiatric Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

The concept of allusive thinking is briefly reviewed and a Pavlovian model of thinking advanced. It is hypothesized that allusive, as compared with non-allusive thinkers, have a broader but less intense attention process associated with weaker inhibition. From this model it was predicted that on word tests which require judgements of similarity of meaning, allusive thinkers would tend to choose more remote or unusual words as similar in meaning.

The Word Halo Test and the Word Sorting Test were administered to 63 university students using the Object Sorting Test as a measure of allusive thinking. The prediction that allusive thinkers would choose more unusual words as similar in meaning was supported. A tendency for allusive thinkers to be more verbose than non-allusive thinkers was also noted.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , August 1977 , pp. 439 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barr, R. F. & McConaghy, N. (1972). Conditioning in relation to conceptual thinking. British Journal of Psychiatry 121, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benjamin, J. D. (1944). A method for distinguishing and evaluating formal thinking disorders in schizophrenia. In Language and Thought in Schizophrenia (ed. Kasanin, J. S.), pp. 65–90. University of California Press: Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bleuler, E. (1911). Dementia Praecox or The Group of Schizophrenias (trans. 1950 by Zinkin, J.). International University Press: New York.Google Scholar
Broen, W. E. (1966). Lawful disorganization: the process underlying the schizophrenic syndrome. Psychological Review 73, 265–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broen, W. E. (1968). Schizophrenia: Research and Theory. Academic Press: New York.Google Scholar
Broen, W. E. & Storms, L. H. (1961). A reaction potential ceiling and response decrements in complex situations. Psychological Review 68, 405–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, S. (1953). Overinclusive thinking in a schizophrenic and a control group. Journal of Consulting Psychology 17, 384–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, S. R. & Leff, J. P. (1971). Parental abnormalities of verbal communication in the transmission of schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine 1, 118–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirsch, S. R. & Leff, J. P. (1975). Abnormalities in Parents of Schizophrenics. Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Monographs, no. 22. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Lovibond, S. H. (1954). The object sorting test and conceptual thinking in schizophrenia. Australian Journal of Psychology 6, 52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovibond, S. H. (1963). Conceptual thinking, personality and conditioning. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 2, 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovibond, S. H. (1966). Interim Manual for the Object Sorting Scales. Australian Council for Educational Research: Melbourne.Google Scholar
McConaghy, N. (1960). Modes of abstract thinking and psychosis. American Journal of Psychiatry 117, 106–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConaghy, N. (1961). The measurement of an inhibitory process in human higher nervous activity: its relation to allusive thinking and fatigue. American Journal of Psychiatry 118, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McConaghy, N. (1974). Are we genetically programmed to conceptually distort reality? In Essays on Schizophrenia, p. 12. Ethnor Pty. Ltd, Janssen Division: Sydney.Google Scholar
McConaghy, N. & Clancy, M. (1968). Familial relationships of allusive thinking in university students and their parents. British Journal of Psychiatry 114, 1079–1087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mednick, S. A. (1958). A learning theory approach to research in schizophrenia. Psychological Bulletin 55, 316–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. (1967). Psycholinguistic approaches to the study of communication. In Journeys in Science (ed. Arm, D. L.), pp. 22–73. University of New Mexico Press: Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1969). A psychological method to investigate verbal concepts. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 6, 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, L. J. (1953). Vocabulary knowledge and usage among normal and schizophrenic subjects. Psychological Monographs 67 (20, whole no. 370).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned Reflexes. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Pavlov, I. P. (1941). Conditioned Reflexes and Psychiatry (trans. Gantt, W. H.). International Publishers: New York.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W., Matussek, P. & George, E. I. (1959). An experimental study of schizophrenic thought disorder. Journal of Mental Science 105, 627–652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, M. T. & Wynne, L. C. (1963). Differentiating characteristics of parents of childhood schizophrenics, childhood neurotics, and young adult schizophrenics. American Journal of Psychiatry 120, 234–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, M. T. & Wynne, L. C. (1965). Thought disorder and family relations of schizophrenics: IV. Results and implications. Archives of General Psychiatry 12, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed