Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:14:10.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Providing information about the effectiveness of treatment options to depressed people in the community: a randomized controlled trial of effects on mental health literacy, help-seeking and symptoms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2003

A. F. JORM
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
K. M. GRIFFITHS
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
H. CHRISTENSEN
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
A. E. KORTEN
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
R. A. PARSLOW
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
B. RODGERS
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

Abstract

Background. Many people who are depressed do not receive any professional help and their beliefs about the helpfulness of treatment do not always correspond with those of health professionals. To facilitate choices about treatment, the present study examined the effects of providing depressed people in the community with evidence on whether various treatment options work.

Method. A randomized controlled trial was carried out with 1094 persons selected at random from the community who screened positive for depressive symptoms and agreed to participate. Participants were mailed either an evidence-based consumer guide to treatments for depression or, as a control, a general brochure on depression. Outcomes were the rated usefulness of the information provided, changes in attitudes to depression treatments, actions taken to reduce depression, and changes in depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms and disability.

Results. Participants rated the evidence-based consumer guide as more useful than the control brochure. Attitudes to some treatments changed. Improvements in symptoms and disability did not differ significantly between interventions.

Conclusion. Providing people who are depressed with evidence on which treatments work produces some changes in attitudes and behaviour. However, this intervention may need to be enhanced if it is to produce symptom change.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)