Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:13:12.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parental punitive discipline, negative life events and gene–environment interplay in the development of externalizing behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2007

T. M. M. Button ,
J. Y. F. Lau ,
B. Maughan  and
T. C. Eley
T. M. M. Button*
Affiliation:
Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
J. Y. F. Lau
Affiliation:
National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, UK
B. Maughan
Affiliation:
MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, UK
T. C. Eley
Affiliation:
MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr T. M. M. Button, Institute for Behavioral Genetics, 447 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0447, USA. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

To investigate the extent to which three putative ‘environmental’ risk factors, maternal punitive discipline (MPD), paternal punitive discipline (PPD) and negative life events (NLEs), share genetic influences with, and moderate the heritability of, externalizing behavior.

Method

The sample consisted of 2647 participants, aged 12–19 years, from the G1219 and G1219Twins longitudinal studies. Externalizing behavior was measured using the Youth Self-Report, MPD, PPD and exposure to NLEs were assessed using the Negative Sanctions Scale and the Life Event Scale for Adolescents respectively.

Result

Genetic influences overlapped for externalizing behavior and each ‘environmental’ risk, indicating gene–environment correlation. When controlling for the gene–environment correlation, genetic variance decreased, and both shared and non-shared environmental influences increased, as a function of MPD. Genetic variance increased as a function of PPD, and for NLEs the only interaction effect was on the level of non-shared environment influence unique to externalizing behavior.

Conclusion

The magnitude of the influence of genetic risk on externalizing behavior is contextually dependent, even after controlling for gene–environment correlation.

Keywords

Externalizing behaviorgene–environment correlationgene–environment interactionnegative life eventspunitive discipline
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 29 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, T (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist: 4–18 and 1991 Profile. University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry: Burlington, VT.Google Scholar
Billig, JP, Hershberger, SL, Iacono, WG, McGue, M (1996). Life events and personality in late adolescence: genetic and environmental relations. Behavior Genetics 26, 543–554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bronfenbrenner, U, Ceci, SJ (1994). Nature–nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: a bioecological model. Psychological Review 101, 568–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Button, TMM, Scourfield, J, Martin, N, Purcell, S, McGuffin, P (2005). Family dysfunction interacts with genes in the causation of antisocial symptoms. Behavior Genetics 35, 115–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cadoret, RJ, Yates, WR, Troughton, E, Woodworth, G, Stewart, MA (1995). Genetic–environmental interaction in the genesis of aggressivity and conduct disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry 52, 916–924.Google Scholar
Caspi, A, McClay, J, Moffitt, TE, Mill, J, Martin, J, Craig, IW, Taylor, A, Poulton, R (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science 297, 851–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Champion, LA, Goodall, G, Rutter, M (1995). Behaviour problems in childhood and stressors in early adult life. I. A 20-year follow-up of London school children. Psychological Medicine 25, 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, DJ, Dibble, E, Grawe, JM, Pollin, W (1975). Reliably separating identical from fraternal twins. Archives of General Psychiatry 32, 1371–1375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, J, Deater-Deckard, K, Pickering, K, O'Connor, TG, Golding, J, and the ALSPAC Study Team (1998). Children's adjustment and prosocial behavior in step-, single, and nonstep-family settings: findings from a community study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 39, 1083–1095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eaves, LJ, Silberg, JL, Meyer, JM, Maes, HH, Simonoff, E, Pickles, A, Rutter, M, Neale, MC, Reynolds, CA, Erikson, MT, Heath, AC, Loeber, R, Truett, KR, Hewitt, JK (1997). Genetics and developmental psychopathology: 2. The main effects of genes and environment on behavioral problems in the Virginia Twin Study of Adolescent Behavioral Development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 38, 965–980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edelbrock, C, Rende, R, Plomin, R, Thompson, LA (1995). A twin study of competence and problem behavior in childhood and early adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 36, 775–785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eley, TC, Liang, H, Plomin, R, Sham, P, Sterne, A, Williamson, R, Purcell, S (2004). Parental familial vulnerability, family environment, and their interactions as predictors of depressive symptoms in adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 43, 298–306.Google Scholar
Falconer, DS, Mackay, TFC (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn.Longman: New York.Google Scholar
Foley, DL, Eaves, LJ, Wormley, B, Silberg, JL, Maes, HH, Kuhn, J, Riley, B (2004). Childhood adversity, monoamine oxidase A genotype, and risk for conduct disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry 61, 738–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ge, X, Conger, RD, Cadoret, RJ, Neiderhiser, JM, Yates, WR, Troughton, E, Stewart, MA (1994). The developmental interface between nature and nurture: a mutual influence model of child antisocial behavior and parent behaviors. Developmental Psychology 31, 574–589.Google Scholar
Hetherington, EM, Clingempeel, WG (1992). Coping with marital transitions: a family systems perspective. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57 (2–3. Serial no. 227).Google Scholar
Kerr, DC, Lopez, NL, Olson, SL, Sameroff, AJ (2004). Parental discipline and externalizing behavior problems in early childhood: the roles of moral regulation and child gender. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 32, 369–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, RF, Schmutte, PS, Caspi, A, Moffitt, TE, Campbell, K, Silva, PA (1994). Personality traits are linked to crime among men and women: evidence from a birth cohort. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 103, 328–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzer, H, Gatward, R, Goodman, R, Ford, T. (2000). Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in Great Britain. The Stationery Office: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neale, MC (1997). Mx: Statistical Modeling, 3rd edn. Department of Psychiatry, MCV: Richmond, VA.Google Scholar
Nix, RL, Pinderhughes, EE, Dodge, KA, Bates, JE, Pettit, GS, Fadyen-Ketchum, SA (1999). The relation between mothers' hostile attribution tendencies and children's externalizing behavior problems: the mediating role of mothers' harsh discipline practices. Child Development 70, 896–909.Google Scholar
O'Connor, TG, Deater-Deckard, K, Fulker, D, Rutter, M, Plomin, R (1998). Genotype–environment correlations in late childhood and early adolescence: antisocial behavioral problems and coercive parenting. Developmental Psychology 34, 970–981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plomin, R, DeFries, JC, Loehlin, JC (1977). Genotype–environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human behavior. Psychological Medicine 84, 309–322.Google ScholarPubMed
Purcell, S (2002). Variance components models for gene–environment interaction in twin analysis. Twin Research 5, 554–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purcell, S, Koenen, KC (2005). Environmental mediation and the twin design. Behavior Genetics 35, 491–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raine, A (2002). Biosocial studies of antisocial and violent behavior in children and adults: a review. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 30, 311–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riggins-Caspers, KM, Cadoret, RJ, Knutson, JF, Langbehn, D (2003). Biology–environment interaction and evocative biology–environment correlation: contributions of harsh discipline and parental psychopathology to problem adolescent behaviors. Behavior Genetics 33, 205–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robins, LN (1978). Sturdy childhood predictors of adult antisocial behaviour: replications from longitudinal studies. Psychological Medicine 8, 611–622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, R, Maughan, B, Eley, TC (2006). Links between antisocial behavior and depressed mood: the role of life events and attributional style. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 34, 293–302.Google Scholar
Rutter, M, Giller, H, Hagell, A (1998). Antisocial Behavior by Young People. Cambridge University Press: New York.Google Scholar
Rutter, M, Silberg, J (2002). Gene–environment interplay in relation to emotional and behavioral disturbance. Annual Review of Psychology 53, 463–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saudino, KJ, Pedersen, NL, Lichtenstein, P, McClearn, GE, Plomin, R (1997). Can personality explain genetic influences on life events? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72, 196–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scarr, S, McCartney, K (1983). How people make their own environments: a theory of genotype greater than environment effects. Child Development 54, 424–435.Google ScholarPubMed
Sham, PC, Sterne, A, Purcell, S, Cherny, SS, Webster, M, Rijsdijk, F, Asherson, P, Ball, D, Craig, IW, Eley, TC, Goldberg, D, Gray, J, Mann, A, Owen, M, Plomin, R (2000). GENESiS: creating a composite index of the vulnerability to anxiety and depression in a community-based sample of siblings. Twin Research. 3, 316–322.Google Scholar
Shanahan, MJ, Hofer, SM. (2005). Social context in gene–environment interactions: retrospect and prospect. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 60, 65–76.Google Scholar
SPSS (2004). SPSS for Windows, Release 12.0.2. SPSS Inc.: Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Thapar, A, McGuffin, P (1996). Genetic influences on life events in childhood. Psychological Medicine 26, 813–820.Google Scholar
Tuvblad, C, Grann, M, Lichtenstein, P (2005). Heritability for adolescent antisocial behavior differs with socioeconomic status: gene–environment interaction. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 47, 734–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, TD, Kendler, KS (2000). The genetic epidemiology of parental discipline. Psychological Medicine 30, 1303–1313.Google Scholar
Wiesner, M, Windle, M (2004). Assessing covariates of adolescent delinquency trajectories: a latent growth mixture modeling approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 33, 431–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar