Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:39:59.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neighborhood alcohol outlet density and genetic influences on alcohol use: evidence for gene–environment interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2018

Wendy S. Slutske ,
Arielle R. Deutsch  and
Thomas M. Piasecki
Wendy S. Slutske*
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Arielle R. Deutsch
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Thomas M. Piasecki
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Wendy Slutske, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Genetic influences on alcohol involvement are likely to vary as a function of the ‘alcohol environment,’ given that exposure to alcohol is a necessary precondition for genetic risk to be expressed. However, few gene–environment interaction studies of alcohol involvement have focused on characteristics of the community-level alcohol environment. The goal of this study was to examine whether living in a community with more alcohol outlets would facilitate the expression of the genetic propensity to drink in a genetically-informed national survey of United States young adults.

Methods

The participants were 2434 18–26-year-old twin, full-, and half-sibling pairs from Wave III of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. Participants completed in-home interviews in which alcohol use was assessed. Alcohol outlet densities were extracted from state-level liquor license databases aggregated at the census tract level to derive the density of outlets.

Results

There was evidence that the estimates of genetic and environmental influences on alcohol use varied as a function of the density of alcohol outlets in the community. For example, the heritability of the frequency of alcohol use for those residing in a neighborhood with ten or more outlets was 74% (95% confidence limits = 55–94%), compared with 16% (95% confidence limits = 0–34%) for those in a neighborhood with zero outlets. This moderating effect of alcohol outlet density was not explained by the state of residence, population density, or neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics.

Conclusions

The results suggest that living in a neighborhood with many alcohol outlets may be especially high-risk for those individuals who are genetically predisposed to frequently drink.

Keywords

Alcohol outlet densityalcohol usegene–environment interactionneighborhoodtwins
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , February 2019 , pp. 474 - 482
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayuka, F, Barnett, R and Pearce, J (2014) Neighbourhood availability of alcohol outlets and hazardous alcohol consumption in New Zealand. Health & Place 29, 186–199.Google Scholar
Belsky, DW, Moffitt, TE and Caspi, A (2013) Genetics in population health science: strategies and opportunities. American Journal of Public Health 103(S1), S73–S83.Google Scholar
Berke, EM et al. (2010) Alcohol retail density and demographic predictors of health disparities: a geographic analysis. American Journal of Public Health 100, 1967–1971.Google Scholar
Boardman, JD, Daw, J and Freese, J (2013) Defining the environment in gene–environment research: lessons from social epidemiology. American Journal of Public Health 103(S1), S64–S72.Google Scholar
Bookman, EB et al. (2011) Gene-environment interplay in common complex diseases: forging an integrative model—recommendations from an NIH workshop. Genetic Epidemiology 35, 217–225.Google Scholar
Bryden, A et al. (2012) A systematic review of the influence on alcohol use of community level availability and marketing of alcohol. Health & Place 18, 349–357.Google Scholar
Buu, A et al. (2007) Alcoholism effects on social migration and neighborhood effects on alcoholism over the course of 12 years. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 31, 1545–1551.Google Scholar
Campbell, CA et al. and the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. (2009) The effectiveness of limiting alcohol outlet density as a means of reducing excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 37, 556–559.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) Guide for Measuring Alcohol Outlet Density. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Chartier, KG et al. (2017) Environmental influences on alcohol use: informing research on the joint effects of genes and the environment in diverse US populations. The American Journal on Addictions 26, 446–460.Google Scholar
Chen, P and Chantala, K (2014) Guidelines for analyzing Add Health data. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1–53.Google Scholar
Davis, CN, Natta, SS and Slutske, WS (2017) Moderation of genetic influences on alcohol involvement by rural residency among adolescents: results from the 1962 national merit twin study. Behavior Genetics 47, 1–9.Google Scholar
Daw, J et al. (2014) The interactive effect of neighborhood peer cigarette use and 5HTTLPR genotype on individual cigarette use. Addictive Behaviors 39, 1804–1810.Google Scholar
Dick, DM (2011) Gene-environment interactions in psychological traits and disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 7, 383–409.Google Scholar
Dick, DM and Kendler, KS (2012) The impact of gene–environment interaction on alcohol use disorders. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews 34, 318–324.Google Scholar
Dick, DM et al. (2001) Exploring gene-environment interactions: socioregional moderation of alcohol use. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 110, 625–632.Google Scholar
Dinescu, D et al. (2016) Socioeconomic modifiers of genetic and environmental influences on body mass index in adult twins. Health Psychology 35, 157.Google Scholar
Duncan, GE et al. (2014) Stepping towards causation in studies of neighborhood and environmental effects: how twin research can overcome problems of selection and reverse causation. Health & Place 27, 106–111.Google Scholar
Eaves, L, Silberg, J and Erkanli, A (2003) Resolving multiple epigenetic pathways to adolescent depression. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 44, 1006–1014.Google Scholar
Freisthler, B et al. (2014) Tracking the when, where, and with whom of alcohol use: integrating ecological momentary assessment and geospatial data to examine risk for alcohol-related problems. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews 36, 29.Google Scholar
Galea, S, Nandi, A and Vlahov, D (2004) The social epidemiology of substance use. Epidemiologic Reviews 26, 36–52.Google Scholar
Gardner, M, Barajas, RG and Brooks-Gunn, J (2010) Neighborhood influences on substance use etiology: is where you live important? In Scheier, LM (ed), Handbook of Drug Use Etiology: Theory, Methods, and Empirical Findings. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 423–441.Google Scholar
Gmel, G, Holmes, J and Studer, J (2016) Are alcohol outlet densities strongly associated with alcohol-related outcomes? A critical review of recent evidence. Drug and Alcohol Review 35, 40–54.Google Scholar
Gruenewald, PJ (2007) The spatial ecology of alcohol problems: Niche theory and assortative drinking. Addiction 102, 870–878.Google Scholar
Gruenewald, PJ, Remer, LG and LaScala, EA (2014) Testing a social ecological model of alcohol use: the California 50-city study. Addiction 109, 736–745.Google Scholar
Hallberg, J and Osterberg, E (2016) Information on the Nordic Alcohol Market 2016. Helsinki: Alko Inc.Google Scholar
Heath, AC and Nelson, EC (2002) Effects of the interaction between genotype and environment: research into the genetic epidemiology of alcohol dependence. Alcohol Research and Health 26, 193–201.Google Scholar
Huckle, T et al. (2008) Density of alcohol outlets and teenage drinking: living in an alcogenic environment is associated with higher consumption in a metropolitan setting. Addiction 103, 1614–1621.Google Scholar
Kendler, KS. (2011) A conceptual overview of gene-environment interaction and correlation in a developmental context. In Kendler, KS, Jaffee, S & Romer, D (eds), The Dynamic Genome and Mental Health. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 5–28.Google Scholar
Kendler, KS and Eaves, LJ (1986) Models for the joint effect of genotype and environment on liability to psychiatric illness. American Journal of Psychiatry 143, 279–289.Google Scholar
Kirchner, TR and Shiffman, S (2016) Spatio-temporal determinants of mental health and well-being: advances in geographically-explicit ecological momentary assessment (GEMA). Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 51, 1211–1223.Google Scholar
Linton, SL et al. (2016) People and places: relocating to neighborhoods with better economic and social conditions is associated with less risky drug/alcohol network characteristics among African American adults in Atlanta, Georgia. Drug & Alcohol Dependence 160, 30–41.Google Scholar
Livingston, M, Chikritzhs, T and Room, R (2007) Changing the density of alcohol outlets to reduce alcohol-related problems. Drug and Alcohol Review 26, 557–566.Google Scholar
Manuck, SB and McCaffery, JM (2014) Gene-environment interaction. Annual Review of Psychology 65, 41–70.Google Scholar
Meier, PS (2011) Alcohol marketing research: the need for a new agenda. Addiction 106, 466–471.Google Scholar
Meyers, JL et al. (2013) Interaction between polygenic risk for cigarette use and environmental exposures in the Detroit neighborhood health study. Translational Psychiatry 38, e290.Google Scholar
Muthén, LK and Muthén, BO (1998–2012) Mplus User's Guide. 7th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
Österberg, E (2003) Alcohol Policies in E.U. Member States and Norway: A Collection of Country Reports. Helsinki: Stakes.Google Scholar
Piasecki, TM et al. (2011) The subjective effects of alcohol–tobacco co-use: an ecological momentary assessment investigation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 120, 557–571.Google Scholar
Pickett, KE and Pearl, M (2001) Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 55, 111–122.Google Scholar
Pollack, CE et al. (2005) Neighborhood deprivation and alcohol consumption: does the availability of alcohol play a role? International Journal of Epidemiology 34, 772–780.Google Scholar
Purcell, S (2002) Variance components models for gene-environment interaction in twin analysis. Twin Research 5, 554–571.Google Scholar
Rende, R et al. (2009) Incorporating social context into genetic studies of nicotine dependence. In Swan, GE, Baker, TB, Chassin, L, Conti, DV, Lerman, C and Perkins, KA (eds), Phenotypes and Endophenotypes: Foundations for Genetic Studies of Nicotine Use and Dependence. National Cancer Institute, Tobacco Control Monograph No. 20. National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, MD, pp. 509–533.Google Scholar
Robert, SA (1999) Socioeconomic position and health: the independent contribution of community socioeconomic context. Annual Review of Sociology 25, 489–516.Google Scholar
Romley, JA et al. (2007) Alcohol and environmental justice: the density of liquor stores and bars in urban neighborhoods in the United States. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 68, 48–55.Google Scholar
Rose, RJ et al. (2001) Gene-environment interaction in patterns of adolescent drinking: regional residency moderates longitudinal influences on alcohol use. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 25, 637–643.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. (2006) Genes and Behavior: Nature-Nurture Interplay Explained. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Salvatore, JE, Cho, SB and Dick, DM (2017) Genes, environments, and sex differences in alcohol research. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 78, 494–501.Google Scholar
Salvatore, JE et al. (2014) Polygenic scores predict alcohol problems in an independent sample and show moderation by the environment. Genes 5, 330–346.Google Scholar
Salvatore, JE et al. (2015) Polygenic risk for externalizing disorders gene-by-development and gene-by-environment effects in adolescents and young adults. Clinical Psychological Science 3, 189–201.Google Scholar
Scribner, R et al. (2008) The contextual role of alcohol outlet density in college drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 69, 112–120.Google Scholar
Shanahan, MJ and Hofer, SM (2005) Social context in gene-environment interactions: retrospect and prospect. Journals of Gerontology: Series B 60B, 65–76.Google Scholar
Sharkey, P and Faber, JW (2014) Where, when, why, and for whom do residential contexts matter? Moving away from the dichotomous understanding of neighborhood effects. Annual Review of Sociology 40, 559–579.Google Scholar
Slutske, WS, Deutsch, AR and Piasecki, TM (2016) Neighborhood contextual factors, alcohol use, and alcohol problems in the United States: evidence from a nationally representative study of young adults. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 40, 1010–1019.Google Scholar
Slutske, WS et al. (2015) Local area disadvantage and gambling involvement and disorder: evidence for gene-environment correlation and interaction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 124, 606.Google Scholar
Spoerri, A et al. (2013) Alcohol-selling outlets and mortality in Switzerland—the Swiss national cohort. Addiction 108, 1603–1611.Google Scholar
Stockwell, T and Gruenewald, P (2004) Controls on the physical availability of alcohol. In Heather, N and Stockwell, T (eds), The Essential Handbook of Treatment and Prevention of Alcohol Problems Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 213–233.Google Scholar
Strachan, E et al. (2017) Neighborhood deprivation and depression in adult twins: genetics and gene x environment interaction. Psychological Medicine 47, 627–638.Google Scholar
Treloar, H et al. (2015) Ecological evidence that affect and perceptions of drink effects depend on alcohol expectancies. Addiction 110, 1432–1442.Google Scholar
Truong, KD and Sturm, R (2007) Alcohol outlets and problem drinking among adults in California. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 68, 923–933.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes. (2015) Available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-commuting-area-codes/ (Accessed 18 March 2018).Google Scholar
van der Sluis, S, Posthuma, D and Dolan, CV (2012) A note on false positives and power in GxE modelling of twin data. Behavior Genetics 42, 170–186.Google Scholar
Whitfield, JB et al. (2005) Choice of residential location: chance, family influences, or genes? Twin Research and Human Genetics 8, 22–26.Google Scholar
Xuan, Z et al. (2015) The alcohol policy environment and policy subgroups as predictors of binge drinking measures among US adults. American Journal of Public Health 105, 816–822.Google Scholar
Young, R, Macdonald, L and Ellaway, A (2013) Associations between proximity and density of local alcohol outlets and alcohol use among Scottish adolescents. Health & Place 19, 124–130.Google Scholar
Young-Wolff, KC, Enoch, M and Prescott, CA (2011) The influence of gene-environment interactions on alcohol consumption and alcohol use disorders: a comprehensive review. Clinical Psychology Review 31, 800–816.Google Scholar
Zhang, X et al. (2015) Changes in density of on-premises alcohol outlets and impact on violent crime, Atlanta, Georgia, 1997–2007. Preventing Chronic Disease 12, E84.Google Scholar