Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:50:48.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The efficiency of two-phase designs in prevalence surverys of mental disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Stephen C. Newman ,
Patrick E. Shrout  and
Roger C. Bland
Stephen C. Newman*
Affiliation:
Department of psychiatry, University of Alberta and Mental Services, Alberta Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada and Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA
Patrick E. Shrout
Affiliation:
Department of psychiatry, University of Alberta and Mental Services, Alberta Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada and Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA
Roger C. Bland
Affiliation:
Department of psychiatry, University of Alberta and Mental Services, Alberta Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada and Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr S. Newman, Department of Psychiatry, Mackenzie Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2B7.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

A two-phase survey of mental disorders uses a screening test to identify possible cases, thereby reducing the resources devoted to interviewing those not having the condition of interest. It is demonstrated using a mathematical model that in situations likely to be encountered in practice a two-phase design may lead to an increase in the efficiency of prevalence rate estimation, and also to an improvement in the efficiency of case detection. However, in certain applications the modest gain in efficiency may not warrant the additional complexity of a two-phase approach to data collection. Data from a survey of mental disorders in Edmonton, Canada, which collected informations on 3258 community residents using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule and the General Health Questionnaire, are used to demonstrate how two-phase methods would have changed the efficiency of an actual survey.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , February 1990 , pp. 183 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed.APA: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Anthony, J. C., Folstein, M., Romanoski, A. J., Von Korff, M. R., Nestadt, G. R., Chahal, R., Merchant, A., Brown, C. H., Shapiro, S., Kramer, M. & Gruenberg, E. M. (1985). Comparison of the lay Diagnosis. Archives of General Psychiatry 42, 667–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. E., Barrett, J. A., Oxman, T. E. & Gerber, P. D. (1988) The Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in a primary care practice. Archives of General Psychiatry 45, 1100–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebbington, P., Hurry, J., Tennant, C., Sturt, E. & Wing, J. K. (1981). Epidemiology of mental disorders in Camberwell. Psychological Medicine 11, 561–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bird, H. R., Canino, G., Rubio-Stipec, M., Gould, M. S., Ribera, J., Sesman, M., Woodbury, M., Huertas-Goldman, S., Pagan, A., Sanchez-Lacay, A. & Moscoso, M. (1988). Estimates of the prevalence of chilhood maladjustment in a community survey in Puerto Rico. Archives of General Psychiatry 45, 1120–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, A. A. & Gart, J. J. (1966). Comparison of a screening test and a reference test in epidemiologic studies. I. Indices of agreement and their relations to prevalence. American Journal of Epidemiology 83, 586–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques, 3rd ed.Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
Cohen, P. & Cohen, J., (1984). The Clinician's illusion. Archives of General Psychiatry 41, 1178–1182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, B. & Morgan, H. G. (1973). Epidemiological Psychiatry. Thomas: Springfield, IL.Google ScholarPubMed
Cooper, L. & Steinberg, D. (1970). Introduction to Methods of Optimization. Saunders: Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Deming, W. E. (1977). An essay on screening, or on two-phase sampling, applied to surveys of a community. International Statistical Review 45, 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, E. L. & Lilienfeld, A. M. (1962). Effects of errors in classification and diagnosis in various types of epidemiological studies. American Journal of Public Health 52, 1137–1144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dohrenwend, B. P. & Shrout, P. E. (1981). Toward the development of a two-stage procedure for case identification and classification in psychiatric epidemiology. In Research in Community and Mental Health, Vol. 2 (ed. Simmons, R.), pp. 295–323. JAI Press: Greenwich, CN.Google Scholar
Espeland, M. A. & Hui, S. L. (1987). A general approach to analyzing epidemiologic data that contain misclassification errors. Biometrics 43, 1001–1012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire: A Technique for the Identification and Assessment of Non-Psychotic Psychiatric Illness. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P. & Blackwell, B. (1970). Psychiatric illness in general practice: a detailed study using a new method of case identification. British Medical Journal ii, 439–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, D. P.Rickels, K., Downing, R. & Hesbacher, P. (1976). A comparison of two psychiatric screening tests. British Journal of Psychiatry 129, 61–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hand, D. J. (1987). Screening v. prevalence estimation. Applied Statistics 36, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, J. A. & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helzer, J. E., Robins, L. N.McEvoy, L. T., Spitznagel, E. L., Stoltzman, R. K., Farmer, A. & Brockington, I. F. (1985). A comparison of clinical and Diagnostic Interview Schedule diagnoses: physician reexamination of lay-interviewed cases in the general population. Archives of General Psychiatry 42, 657–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henderson, S., Duncan-Jones, P., Byrne, D. G.Scott, R. & Adcock, S. (1979). Psychiatric disorder in Canberra: a standardized study of prevalence. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 60, 355–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodiamont, P., Peer, N. & Syben, N. (1987). Epidemiological aspects of psychiatric disorder in a Dutch health area. Psychological Medicine 17, 495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, L. G., Folsom, R., Royall, R., Forsythe, A.McEvoy, L., Holzer, C. E., Rae, D. S. & Woodbury, M. (1985). Parameter and variance estimation. In Epidemiologic Field Methods in Psychiatry (ed. Eaton, W. W. and Kessler, L. G.), pp. 327–349. Academic Press: Orlando, FL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kish, L. (1949). A procedure for objective respondent selection within the household. Journal of the American Statistical Association 44, 380–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kish, L. (1965). Survey Sampling, Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
Mausner, J. S. & Bahn, A. K. (1974). Epidemiology: An Introductory Text. Saunders: Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. M., Berwick, D. M., Weinstein, M. C., Borus, J. F., Budman, S. H. & Klerman, G. L. (1987). Performance of screening and diagnostic tests: application of receiver operating characteristic analysis. Archives of General Psychiatry 44, 550–555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neyman, J. (1938). Contribution to the theory of sampling human populations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 33, 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orn, H., Newman, S. C. & Bland, R. C. (1988). Design and field methods of the Edmonton survey of psychiatric disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (supppl 338) 77, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robins, L. N., Helzer, J. E., Croughan, J. & Ratcliff, K. S. (1981 a). National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: its history, characteristics and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry 38, 381–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robins, L. N., Helzer, J. E., Croughan, J., Williams, J. B. W. & Spitzer, R. L. (1981 b). The NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule: Version III. National Institute of Mental Health: Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
Robins, L. N., Helzer, J. E., Ratcliff, K. S. & Seyfried, W. (1982). Validity of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Version II: DSM-III diagnoses. Psychological Medicine 12, 855–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sen, B., Wilkinson, G. & Mari, J. J. (1987). Psychiatric morbidity in primary health care: a two-stage screening procedure in developing countries. British Journal of Psychiatry 151, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, B. V. (1981). SESUDAAN: Standard Errors Program for Computing of Standardized Rates from Sample Survey Data. Research Triangle Institute: Research Triangle Park, NC.Google Scholar
Shrout, P. E. (1989). Statistical design of screening procedures. In Screening for Depression in Primary Care (ed. Attkisson, C. and Zich, J.). Routledge, Chapman and Hall: New York.Google Scholar
Shrout, P. E. & Newman, S. C. (1989). Design of two-phase prevalence surveys of rare disorders. Biometrics 45, 549–555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrout, P. E., Skodol, A. E. & Dohrenwend, B. P., (1986). A two-stage approach for case identification and diagnosis: first-stage instruments. In Mental Disorders in the Community: Progress and Challenge (ed. Barrett, J. E. and Rose, R. M.), pp. 286–303. Guilford Press: New York.Google Scholar
Tenenbein, A. (1970). A double sampling scheme for estimating from binomial data with misclassifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 65, 1350–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Korff, M., Nestadt, G., Romanoski, A., Anthony, J., Eaton, W., Merchant, A., Chahal, R.Kramer, M., Folstein, M. & Gruenberg, E. (1985). Prevalence of treated and untreated DSM-III schizophrenia: results of a two-stage community survey. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 173, 577–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed