Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:51:37.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disturbances in the spontaneous attribution of social meaning in schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2008

W. P. Horan ,
K. H. Nuechterlein ,
J. K. Wynn ,
J. Lee ,
F. Castelli  and
M. F. Green
W. P. Horan*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
K. H. Nuechterlein
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
J. K. Wynn
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
J. Lee
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
F. Castelli
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
M. F. Green
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
*
*Address for correspondence: W. P. Horan, Ph.D., 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite 2240, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6968, USA. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Schizophrenia patients show disturbances on a range of tasks that assess mentalizing or ‘Theory of Mind’ (ToM). However, these tasks are often developmentally inappropriate, make large demands on verbal abilities and explicit problem-solving skills, and involve after-the-fact reflection as opposed to spontaneous mentalizing.

Method

To address these limitations, 55 clinically stable schizophrenia out-patients and 44 healthy controls completed a validated Animations Task designed to assess spontaneous attributions of social meaning to ambiguous abstract visual stimuli. In this paradigm, 12 animations depict two geometric shapes ‘interacting’ with each other in three conditions: (1) ToM interactions that elicit attributions of mental states to the agents, (2) Goal-Directed (GD) interactions that elicit attributions of simple actions, and (3) Random scenes in which no interaction occurs. Verbal descriptions of each animation are rated for the degree of Intentionality attributed to the agents and for accuracy.

Results

Patients had lower Intentionality ratings than controls for ToM and GD scenes but the groups did not significantly differ for Random scenes. The descriptions of the patients less closely matched the situations intended by the developers of the task. Within the schizophrenia group, performance on the Animations Task showed minimal associations with clinical symptoms.

Conclusions

Patients demonstrated disturbances in the spontaneous attribution of mental states to abstract visual stimuli that normally evoke such attributions. Hence, in addition to previously established impairment on mentalizing tasks that require logical inferences about others' mental states, individuals with schizophrenia show disturbances in implicit aspects of mentalizing.

Keywords

Anthropomorphizingmentalizingschizophreniasocial cognitiontheory of mind
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , April 2009 , pp. 635 - 643
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abell, F, Happe, F, Frith, U (2000). Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development. Journal of Cognitive Development 15, 1–20.Google Scholar
Andreasen, NC (1984). The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). The University of Iowa: Iowa City, IA.Google Scholar
Bargh, JA, Williams, EL (2006). The automaticity of social life. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15, 1–4.Google Scholar
Berry, DS, Misovich, SJ, Kean, KJ, Baron, RM (1992). Effects of disruption of structure and motion on perceptions of social causality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18, 237–244.Google Scholar
Berry, DS, Springer, K (1993). Structure, motion, and pre-schoolers' perceptions of social causality. Ecological Psychology 5, 273–283.Google Scholar
Blakemore, SJ, Decety, J (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 561–567.Google Scholar
Blakemore, SJ, Sarfati, Y, Bazin, N, Decety, J (2003). The detection of intentional contingencies in simple animations in patients with delusions of persecution. Psychological Medicine 33, 1433–1441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanchard, JJ, Cohen, AS (2006). The structure of negative symptoms within schizophrenia: implications for assessment. Schizophrenia Bulletin 32, 238–245.Google Scholar
Bowler, DM, Thommen, E (2000). Attribution of mechanical and social causality to animated displays by children with autism. Autism 4, 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brothers, L (1990). The social brain. A project for integrating primate behavior and neurophysiology in a new domain. Concepts in Neuroscience 1, 27–51.Google Scholar
Brune, M (2005). ‘Theory of mind’ in schizophrenia: a review of the literature. Schizophrenia Bulletin 31, 21–42.Google Scholar
Brune, M, Brune-Cohrs, U (2006). Theory of mind – evolution, ontogeny, brain mechanisms and psychopathology. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 30, 437–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burns, J (2006). The social brain hypothesis of schizophrenia. World Psychiatry 5, 77–81.Google Scholar
Castelli, F (2005). The Valley task: understanding intention from goal-directed motion in typical development and autism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 24, 655–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castelli, F, Frith, C, Happe, F, Frith, U (2002). Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain 125, 1839–1849.Google Scholar
Castelli, F, Happe, F, Frith, U, Frith, C (2000). Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuroimage 12, 314–325.Google Scholar
Corcoran, R, Mercer, G, Frith, CD (1995). Schizophrenia, symptomatology, and social inference: investigating ‘theory of mind’ in people with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 17, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Couture, SM, Penn, DL, Roberts, DL (2006). The functional significance of social cognition in schizophrenia: a review. Schizophrenia Bulletin 32 (Suppl. 1), S44–S63.Google Scholar
Dunbar, RIM (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology 6, 178–190.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
First, MB, Gibbon, M, Spitzer, RL, Williams, JBW (1996). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders. Patient Edition. Biometrics Research: New York.Google Scholar
First, MB, Spitzer, RL, Gibbon, M, Williams, JBW, Benjamin, L (1994). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (Version 2.0). New York State Psychiatric Institute: New York, NY.Google Scholar
Frith, CD (1992). The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hove, UK.Google Scholar
Frith, CD (2004). Schizophrenia and theory of mind. Psychological Medicine 34, 385–389.Google Scholar
Frith, CD, Frith, U (2006). How we predict what other people are going to do? Brain Research 1079, 36–46.Google Scholar
Frith, U, Frith, CD (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 358, 459–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
German, TP, Niehaus, JL, Roarty, MP, Giesbrecht, B, Miller, MB (2004). Neural correlates of detecting pretense: automatic engagement of the intentional stance under covert conditions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16, 1805–1817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, MF, Kern, RS, Braff, DL, Mintz, J (2000). Neurocognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia. Are we measuring the ‘right stuff’? Schizophrenia Bulletin 26, 119–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, MF, Olivier, B, Crawley, JN, Penn, DL, Silverstein, S (2005). Social cognition in schizophrenia. Recommendations from the MATRICS New Approaches Conference. Schizophrenia Bulletin 31, 882–887.Google Scholar
Guy, W (1976). ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare: Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
Harrington, L, Siegert, RJ, McClure, J (2005). Theory of mind in schizophrenia: a critical review. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 10, 249–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hashimoto, H (1966). A phenomenal analysis of social perception. Journal of Child Development 2, 1–26.Google Scholar
Heberlein, AS, Adolphs, R (2004). Impaired spontaneous anthropomorphizing despite intact perception and social knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101, 7487–7491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heider, F, Simmel, M (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology 57, 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herold, R, Tenyi, T, Lenard, K, Trixler, M (2002). Theory of mind deficit in people with schizophrenia during remission. Psychological Medicine 32, 1125–1129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J, Doop, ML, Blake, R, Park, S (2005). Impaired visual recognition of biological motion in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 77, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klin, A (2000). Attributing social meaning to ambiguous visual stimuli in higher-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: the Social Attribution Task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 41, 831–846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klin, A, Jones, W (2006). Attributing social and physical meaning to ambiguous visual displays in individuals with higher-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Brain and Cognition 61, 40–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, AM (1994). TOMM, ToBy, and Agency: core architecture and domain specificity. In Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture (ed. Hirschfeld, L. A. and Gelman, S. A.), pp. 119–148. Cambridge University Press: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, AM, Friedman, O, German, TP (2004). Core mechanisms in ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8, 528–533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liddle, PF (1999). The multidimensional phenotype of schizophrenia. In Schizophrenia in the Molecular Age (ed. Tamminga, C. A.), pp. 1–28. American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Lieberman, MD (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: a review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology 58, 259–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lukoff, D, Nuechterlein, KH, Ventura, J (1986). Manual for the expanded Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Schizophrenia Bulletin 12, 578–602.Google Scholar
Marek, J (1966). Information, perception, and social context. II: The balance and relevance of complex perceptual responses. Human Relations 19, 353–380.Google Scholar
Nuechterlein, KH, Barch, DM, Gold, JM, Goldberg, TE, Green, MF, Heaton, RK (2004). Identification of separable cognitive factors in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 72, 29–39.Google Scholar
Overall, JE, Gorham, DR (1962). The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychological Reports 10, 799–812.Google Scholar
Penn, DL, Addington, J, Pinkham, A (2006). Social cognitive impairments. In The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Schizophrenia (ed. Lieberman, J. A., Stroup, T. S. and Perkins, D. O.), pp. 261–274. American Psychiatric Publishing: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Premack, D, Woodruff, G (1978). Chimpanzee problem-solving: a test for comprehension. Science 202, 532–535.Google Scholar
Puce, A, Perrett, D (2005). Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. In Social Neuroscience: Key Readings in Social Psychology (ed. Cacioppo, J. T. B. and Gary, G.), pp. 115–129. Psychology Press: New York, NY.Google Scholar
Russell, TA, Reynaud, E, Herba, C, Morris, R, Corcoran, R (2006). Do you see what I see? Interpretations of intentional movement in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 81, 101–111.Google Scholar
Spiers, HJ, Maguire, EA (2006). Spontaneous mentalizing during an interactive real world task: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 44, 1674–1682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tschacher, W, Kupper, Z (2006). Perception of causality in schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Schizophrenia Bulletin 32 (Suppl. 1), S106–S112.Google Scholar
Ventura, J, Green, MF, Shaner, A, Liberman, RP (1993). Training and quality assurance with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: ‘The Drift Busters’. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 3, 221–224.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D (2001). Wechsler Test of Adult Reading. Psychological Corporation: London.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H, Perner, J (1983). Beliefs about belief: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition 13, 103–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed