Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T00:17:38.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decision making and problem solving in adolescents who deliberately self-harm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2008

A. Oldershaw ,
E. Grima ,
F. Jollant ,
C. Richards ,
M. Simic ,
L. Taylor  and
U. Schmidt
A. Oldershaw*
Affiliation:
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
E. Grima
Affiliation:
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
F. Jollant
Affiliation:
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK Université Montpellier 1, France; Inserm U888, Montpellier, France; Department of Psychological Medicine and Psychiatry, Montpellier, France
C. Richards
Affiliation:
Croydon Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, UK
M. Simic
Affiliation:
Croydon Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, UK
L. Taylor
Affiliation:
Croydon Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, UK
U. Schmidt
Affiliation:
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: A. Oldershaw, M.Sc., P059, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Healthy adolescents, and adults who engage in reward-driven, risky behaviours, demonstrate poor decision-making ability. Decision making in deliberate self-harm (DSH), a reward-driven, high-risk behaviour, has received little attention. This study assessed decision making and problem solving in adolescents with current or past SH.

Method

Decision making and problem solving were assessed using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and the Means–Ends Problem-Solving Procedure (MEPS) respectively in 133 adolescents (57 healthy and 22 depressed controls with no SH history and 54 with SH history). A second analysis separated the SH group into current (n=30) and past (n=24) SH.

Results

The collective performance of adolescents with SH history did not differ from depressed or healthy adolescents on the IGT. However, current self-harming adolescents had a trend towards more high-risk choices (p=0.06) than those with previous SH history and were the only group not to significantly improve over time, persisting with high-risk strategy throughout. Those who no longer self-harmed learnt to use a low-risk strategy similar to healthy and depressed controls. Recency of last SH episode correlated with IGT performance. Depressed participants performed well on the IGT but poorly on the MEPS. By contrast, both collective and divided SH groups had comparable MEPS scores to healthy controls, all performing better than depressed participants.

Conclusion

Poor decision making is present in adolescents who currently self-harm but not in those with previous history; improvement in decision-making skills may therefore be linked to cessation of self-harm. Depressed adolescents who do and do not self-harm may have distinct characteristics.

Keywords

Adolescentdecision makingIowa Gambling Taskself-harm
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 95 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bechara, A, Damasio, AR, Damasio, H, Anderson, SW (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 50, 7–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bechara, A, Damasio, H, Damasio, AR, Lee, GP (1999). Different contribution of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience 19, 5473–5481.Google Scholar
Bechara, A, Damasio, H, Tranel, D, Damasio, AR (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science 275, 1293–1295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bechara, A, Damasio, H, Tranel, D, Damasio, AR (2005). The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and some answers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9, 159–162.Google Scholar
Boeka, AB, Lokken, LL (2006). The Iowa Gambling Task as a measure of decision making in women with bulimia nervosa. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 12, 741–745.Google Scholar
Boergers, J, Spirito, A, Donaldson, D (1998). Reasons for adolescent suicide attempts: associations with psychological functioning. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 37, 1287–1293.Google Scholar
Casey, BJ, Giedd, JN, Thomas, KM (2000). Structural and functional brain development and its relation to cognitive development. Biological Psychology 54, 241–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavedini, P, Bassi, T, Ubbiali, A, Casolari, A, Giordani, S, Zorzi, C, Bellodi, L (2004). Neuropsychological investigation of decision-making in anorexia nervosa. Psychiatry Research 127, 259–266.Google Scholar
Cavedini, P, Riboldi, G, D'Annucci, A, Belotti, P, Cisima, M, Bellodi, L (2002 b). Decision-making heterogeneity in obsessive-compulsive disorder: ventromedial prefrontal cortex function predicts different treatment outcomes. Neuropsychologia 40, 205–211.Google Scholar
Cavedini, P, Riboldi, G, Keller, R, D'Annucci, A, Bellodi, L (2002 a). Frontal lobe dysfunction in pathological gambling patients. Biological Psychiatry 51, 334–341.Google Scholar
Channon, S, Crawford, S (1999). Problem-solving in real-life situations: the effects of anterior and posterior lesions on performance. Neuropsychologia 37, 757–770.Google Scholar
Costello, EJ, Angold, A (1988). Scales to assess child and adolescent depression: checklists, screens, and nets. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 27, 726–737.Google Scholar
Crone, EA, van der Molen, MW (2004). Developmental changes in real life decision making: performance on a gambling task previously shown to depend on the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Developmental Neuropsychology 25, 251–279.Google Scholar
Dunn, BD, Dalgleish, T, Lawrence, AD (2006). The somatic marker hypothesis: a critical evaluation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews 30, 239–271.Google Scholar
D'Zurilla, TJ, Goldfried, MR (1971). Problem solving and behaviour modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 78, 107–126.Google Scholar
Ernst, M, Grant, SJ, London, ED, Contoreggi, CS, Kimes, AS, Spurgeon, L (2003). Decision making in adolescents with behaviour disorders and adults with substance abuse. American Journal of Psychiatry 160, 33–40.Google Scholar
Ernst, M, Pine, DS, Hardin, M (2006). Triadic model of the neurobiology of motivated behaviour in adolescence. Psychological Medicine 36, 299–312.Google Scholar
Fortune, SA, Hawton, K (2005). Deliberate self-harm in children and adolescents: a research update. Current Opinions in Psychiatry 18, 401–406.Google Scholar
Goddard, L, Dritschel, B, Burton, A (1996). Role of autobiographical memory in social problem solving and depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 105, 609–616.Google Scholar
Grant, S, Contoreggi, C, London, ED (2000). Drug abusers show impaired performance on a laboratory test of decision making. Neuropsychologia 38, 1180–1187.Google Scholar
Haaland, VO, Landro, NI (2007). Decision making as measured with the Iowa Gambling Task in patients with borderline personality disorder. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 13, 699–703.Google Scholar
Hawton, K, Kingsbury, S, Steinhardt, K, James, A, Fagg, J (1999). Repetition of deliberate self-harm by adolescents: the role of psychological factors. Journal of Adolescence 22, 369–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawton, K, Rodham, K, Evans, E, Weatherall, R (2002). Deliberate self-harm in adolescents: self-report survey in schools in England. British Medical Journal 325, 1207–1211.Google Scholar
Hjelmeland, H, Groholt, B (2005). A comparative study of young and adult deliberate self-harm patients. Crisis 26, 64–72.Google Scholar
Hooper, CJ, Luciana, M, Conklin, HM, Yarger, RS (2004). Adolescents' performance on the Iowa Gambling Task: implications for the development of decision-making and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Developmental Psychology 40, 1148–1158.Google Scholar
Jollant, F, Bellivier, F, Leboyer, M, Astruc, B, Torres, S, Verdier, R, Castlenau, D, Malafosse, A, Courtet, P (2005). Impaired decision making in suicide attempters. American Journal of Psychiatry 162, 304–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jollant, F, Buresi, C, Guillaume, S, Jaussent, I, Bellivier, F, Leboyer, M, Castelnau, D, Malafosse, A, Courtet, P (2007). The influence of four serotonin-related genes on decision-making in suicide attempters. American Journal of Medical Genetics 5, 615–624.Google Scholar
Kent, L, Vostanis, P, Feehan, C (1997). Detection of major and minor depression in children and adolescents: evaluation of the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 38, 566–573.Google Scholar
Linehan, MM, Camper, P, Chiles, JA, Strosahl, K, Shearin, E (1987). Interpersonal problem solving and parasuicide. Cognitive Therapy and Research 11, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, EM, Williams, JMG, Claridge, GC (1992). Depression and social problem solving. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 101, 78–86.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, J, Miller, P, Warwick, H (1996). Deliberate self-harm in adolescents: hopelessness, depression, problems and problem-solving. Journal of Adolescence 19, 523–532.Google Scholar
Must, A, Szabo, Z, Bodi, N, Szasz, A, Janka, Z, Keri, S (2006). Sensitivity to reward and punishment and the prefrontal cortex in major depression. Journal of Affective Disorders 90, 209–215.Google Scholar
NICE (2005). Depression in Children and Young People. Clinical Guideline 28. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; British Psychological Society: London, UK.Google Scholar
Overman, WH, Frassrand, K, Ansel, S, Trawalter, S, Bies, B, Redmond, A (2004). Performance on the IOWA card task by adolescents and adults. Neuropsychologia 42, 1838–1851.Google Scholar
Platt, JJ, Spivack, G (1975). Manual for the Means–Ends Problem-Solving Procedure (MEPS): A Measure of Interpersonal Problem-Solving Skill. Department of Mental Health Sciences, Hahnemann Medical College and Hospital: Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Pollock, LR, Williams, JMG (2004). Problem-solving in suicide attempters. Psychological Medicine 34, 163–167.Google Scholar
Psychological Corporation (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) manual. San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Quirk, GJ, Beer, JS (2006). Prefrontal involvement in the regulation of emotion: convergence of rat and human studies. Current Opinions in Neurobiology 16, 273–277.Google Scholar
Saver, JL, Damasio, AR (1991). Preserved access and processing of social knowledge in a patient with acquired sociopathy due to ventromedial frontal damage. Neuropsychologia 29, 1241–1249.Google Scholar
Speckens, AEM, Hawton, K (2005). Social problem solving in adolescents with suicidal behaviour: a systematic review. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behaviour 35, 365–386.Google Scholar
Sutherland, K, Bryant, RA (2008). Social problem solving and autobiographical memory in posttraumatic stress disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy 46, 154–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tchanturia, L, Liao, P, Uher, R, Lawrence, N, Treasure, J, Campbell, I (2007). An investigation of decision-making in anorexia nervosa using the Iowa Gambling Task and skin conductance measurements. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 13, 1–7.Google Scholar
Verdejo-Garcia, A, Bechara, A, Recknor, EC, Perez-Garcia, M (2006). Decision-making and the Iowa Gambling Task: ecological validity in individuals with substance dependence. Psychologica Belgica 46, 55–78.Google Scholar
Wood, A, Kroll, L, Moore, A, Harrington, R (1995). Properties of the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire in adolescent psychiatric outpatients: a research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 36, 327–334.Google Scholar