Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T09:19:59.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond problematic binaries in mental healthcare: a commentary on Read & Moncrieff – depression: why drugs and electricity are not the answer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2022

Awais Aftab Open the ORCID record for Awais Aftab [Opens in a new window] ,
Ahmed Samei Huda  and
Christopher Meechan
Awais Aftab*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA Northcoast Behavioral Healthcare (Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services), Northfield, OH, USA
Ahmed Samei Huda
Affiliation:
Tameside and Glossop EIT, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Pennine Care Trust HQ, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK
Christopher Meechan
Affiliation:
Woodland View Hospital, Irvine, Ayrshire & Arran, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Awais Aftab, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 52 , Issue 8 , June 2022 , pp. 1414 - 1415
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is submitted as commentary in response to: Read, J., & Moncrieff, J. (2021). Depression: why drugs and electricity are not the answer. Psychological Medicine, 1–10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721005031

References

Aftab, A. (2020). The false binary between biology and behavior. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 27(3), 317–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsboom, D. (2017). A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry, 16(1), 5–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Casarotto, P. C., Girych, M., Fred, S. M., Kovaleva, V., Moliner, R., Enkavi, G., … Castrén, E. (2021). Antidepressant drugs act by directly binding to TRKB neurotrophin receptors. Cell, 184(5), 1299–1313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Haan, S. (2020). Enactive psychiatry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huda, A. S. (2019). The medical model in mental health: An explanation and evaluation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Achenbach, T. M., Althoff, R. R., Bagby, R. M., … Zimmerman, M. (2017). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of abnormal psychology, 126(4), 454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pender, V. B. (2021). Addressing social determinants of mental health. Psychiatric News, 56(7), 2. https://psychnews.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/appi.pn.2021.7.42.Google Scholar
Phillips, J., Frances, A., Cerullo, M. A., Chardavoyne, J., Decker, H. S., First, M. B., … Zachar, P. (2012). The six most essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis: A pluralogue part 1: Conceptual and definitional issues in psychiatric diagnosis. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 7(1), 1–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Read, J., & Moncrieff, J. (2022). Depression: Why drugs and electricity are not the answer. Psychological Medicine, 1–10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721005031Google ScholarPubMed