Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:51:35.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioral activation system moderates self-referent processing following recovery from depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2013

K. Kircanski ,
H. Mazur  and
I. H. Gotlib
K. Kircanski*
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
H. Mazur
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
I. H. Gotlib
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
*
*Address for correspondence: K. Kircanski, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Jordan Hall, Building 420, Stanford, CA 94305-2130, USA. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Previous research has implicated the behavioral activation system (BAS) in depression. The relationship of BAS functioning to aspects of cognitive vulnerability to depression, however, is not known.

Method

The present study investigated associations among level of BAS functioning and the encoding and recall of positive and negative self-referent information in currently non-depressed participants with a history of recurrent major depression (recovered; RMD) and in never-depressed control participants (CTL). Participants completed self-report measures of levels of BAS and behavioral inhibition system (BIS) functioning. Following a negative mood induction, participants were presented with a series of positive and negative adjectives; they indicated which words described them and later recalled as many of the words as they were able.

Results

The relationship of BAS functioning to self-referent processing was dependent on participant group. Although lower BAS reward responsivity was associated with the endorsement and recall of fewer positive words across groups, the magnitude of these associations was stronger, and was only significant, within the RMD group. Furthermore, only for RMD participants was lower BAS reward responsivity associated with the endorsement of more negative words. These effects were not accounted for by depressive or anxiety symptoms, current mood, or level of BIS functioning.

Conclusions

These results indicate that BAS functioning may be distinctively linked to negatively biased self-referent processing, one facet of cognitive vulnerability to depression, in individuals with a history of major depressive disorder. Enhancing BAS functioning may be important in buffering cognitive vulnerability to depression.

Keywords

Behavioral activation systemcognitive processingdepressionmemoryremission
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 43 , Issue 9 , September 2013 , pp. 1909 - 1919
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, LY, Alloy, LB, Hankin, BL, Haeffel, GJ, MacCoon, DG, Gibb, BE (2002). Cognitive vulnerability-stress models of depression in a self-regulatory and psychobiological context. In Handbook of Depression (ed. Gotlib, I. H. and Hammen, C. L.), pp. 268–294. Guilford Press: New York.Google Scholar
APA (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision. American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Beck, AT (1967). Depression: Clinical, Experimental, and Theoretical Aspects. Hoeber Medical Division: New York.Google Scholar
Beck, AT, Epstein, N, Brown, G, Steer, RA (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 56, 893–897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, AT, Steer, RA, Brown, GK (1996). Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Beevers, CG (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to depression: a dual process model. Clinical Psychology Review 25, 975–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beevers, CG, Meyer, B (2002). Lack of positive experiences and positive expectancies mediate the relationship between BAS responsiveness and depression. Cognition and Emotion 16, 549–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijttebier, P, Beck, I, Claes, L, Vandereycken, W (2009). Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory as a framework for research on personality-psychopathology associations. Clinical Psychology Review 29, 421–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell-Sills, L, Liverant, GL, Brown, TA (2004). Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation scale in a large sample of outpatients with anxiety and mood disorders. Psychological Assessment 16, 244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, CS, White, TL (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67, 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J, Cohen, P (1983). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn.Erlbaum: Hillsdale.Google Scholar
Davidson, RJ (1992). Emotion and affective style: hemispheric substrates. Psychological Science 3, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depue, RA, Iacono, WG (1989). Neurobehavioral aspects of affective disorders. Annual Review of Psychology 40, 457–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derry, PA, Kuiper, NA (1981). Schematic processing and self reference in clinical depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 90, 286–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobson, KS, Shaw, BF (1987). Specificity and stability of self-referent encoding in clinical depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 96, 34–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
First, MB, Spitzer, RL, Gibbon, M, Williams, JBW (1996). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders-Clinician Version (SCID-CV). American Psychiatric Press: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Fowles, DC (1988). Psychophysiology and psychopathology: a motivational approach. Psychophysiology 25, 373–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fritzsche, A, Dahme, B, Gotlib, IH, Joormann, J, Magnussen, H, Watz, H, Nutzinger, DO, von Leupoldt, A (2010). Specificity of cognitive biases in patients with current depression and remitted depression and in patients with asthma. Psychological Medicine 40, 815–826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gotlib, IH, Cane, DB (1987). Construct accessibility and clinical depression: a longitudinal investigation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 96, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gotlib, IH, Joormann, J (2010). Cognition and depression: current status and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 6, 285–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gotlib, IH, Kasch, KL, Traill, S, Joormann, J, Arnow, B, Johnson, SL (2004). Coherence and specificity of information-processing biases in depression and social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 113, 386–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gotlib, IH, Ranganath, C, Rosenfeld, JP (1998). Frontal EEG alpha asymmetry, depression, and cognitive functioning. Cognition and Emotion 12, 449–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, JA (1994). Framework for a taxonomy of psychiatric disorder. In Emotions: Essays on Emotion Theory (ed. Goozen, S. H. M. van, Poll, N. E. van de and Sergeant, J.), pp. 29–59. Erlbaum: Hillsdale.Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E, Allen, JJ (1997). Behavioral activation sensitivity and resting frontal EEG asymmetry: covariation of putative indicators related to risk for mood disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 106, 159–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henriques, JB, Davidson, R (1990). Regional brain electrical asymmetries discriminate between previously depressed and healthy control subjects. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 99, 22–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henriques, JB, Davidson, RJ (1991). Left frontal hypoactivation in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 100, 535–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henriques, JB, Glowacki, JM, Davidson, RJ (1994). Reward fails to alter response bias in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 103, 460–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heubeck, BG, Wilkinson, RB, Cologon, J (1998). A second look at Carver and White's (1994) BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences 25, 785–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorm, A, Christensen, H, Henderson, A, Jacomb, P, Korten, A, Rodgers, B (1998). Using the BIS/BAS scales to measure behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation: factor structure, validity and norms in a large community sample. Personality and Individual Differences 26, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, N, Abramson, LY, Alloy, LB (2001). Remitted depression studies as tests of the cognitive vulnerability hypotheses of depression onset: a critique and conceptual analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 21, 63–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kasch, KL, Rottenberg, J, Arnow, BA, Gotlib, IH (2002). Behavioral activation and inhibition systems and the severity and course of depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 111, 589–597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levens, SM, Gotlib, IH (2010). Updating positive and negative stimuli in working memory in depression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 139, 654–664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levinson, CA, Rodebaugh, TL, Frye, T (2011). An examination of the factor, convergent, and discriminant validity of the behavioral inhibition system and behavioral activation system scales. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 33, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, SB, Gotlib, IH (1993). Attentional processing in clinically depressed subjects: a longitudinal investigation. Cognitive Therapy and Research 17, 359–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, BR, Shankman, SA, Tenke, CE, Bruder, GE, Klein, DN (2006). Behavioral activation system deficits predict the six-month course of depression. Journal of Affective Disorders 91, 229–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mineka, S, Watson, D, Clark, LA (1998). Comorbidity of anxiety and unipolar mood disorders. Annual Review of Psychology 49, 377–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nusslock, R, Shackman, AJ, Harmon-Jones, E, Alloy, LB, Coan, JA, Abramson, LY (2011). Cognitive vulnerability and frontal brain asymmetry: common predictors of first prospective depressive episode. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 120, 497–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinto-Meza, A, Caseras, X, Soler, J, Puigdemont, D, Pérez, V, Torrubia, R (2006). Behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation systems in current and recovered major depression participants. Personality and Individual Differences 40, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, SR, Millis, SR, Bonebright, TL, Bailley, SE (2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of the behavioral inhibition and activation scales. Personality and Individual Differences 33, 861–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scher, CD, Ingram, RE, Segal, ZV (2005). Cognitive reactivity and vulnerability: empirical evaluation of construct activation and cognitive diatheses in unipolar depression. Clinical Psychology Review 25, 487–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spielberg, JM, Heller, W, Silton, RL, Stewart, JL, Miller, GA (2011). Approach and avoidance profiles distinguish dimensions of anxiety and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research 35, 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, R, Jorgensen, RS, Kim, S (2006). Depression, anxiety, and resting frontal EEG asymmetry: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 115, 715–729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westermann, R, Spies, K, Stahl, G, Hesse, FW (1996). Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology 26, 557–580.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinbarg, RE, Yoon, KL (2008). RST and clinical disorders: anxiety and depression. In The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality (ed. Corr, P. J.), pp. 360–397. Cambridge University Press: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar