Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:54:09.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Abuse and dependence on prescription opioids in adults: a mixture categorical and dimensional approach to diagnostic classification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2010

L.-T. Wu ,
G. E. Woody ,
C. Yang ,
J.-J. Pan  and
D. G. Blazer
L.-T. Wu*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
G. E. Woody
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania and Treatment Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
C. Yang
Affiliation:
Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
J.-J. Pan
Affiliation:
Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA
D. G. Blazer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
*
*Address for correspondence: L.-T. Wu, Sc.D., Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

For the emerging DSM-V, it has been recommended that dimensional and categorical methods be used simultaneously in diagnostic classification; however, little is known about this combined approach for abuse and dependence.

Method

Using data (n=37 708) from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), DSM-IV criteria for prescription opioid abuse and dependence among non-prescribed opioid users (n=3037) were examined using factor analysis (FA), latent class analysis (LCA, categorical), item response theory (IRT, dimensional), and factor mixture (hybrid) approaches.

Results

A two-class factor mixture model (FMM) combining features of categorical latent classes and dimensional IRT estimates empirically fitted more parsimoniously to abuse and dependence criteria data than models from FA, LCA and IRT procedures respectively. This mixture model included a severely affected group (7%) with a comparatively moderate to high probability (0.32−0.88) of endorsing all abuse and dependence criteria items, and a less severely affected group (93%) with a low probability (0.003−0.16) of endorsing all criteria. The two empirically defined groups differed significantly in the pattern of non-prescribed opioid use, co-morbid major depression, and substance abuse treatment use.

Conclusions

A factor mixture model integrating categorical and dimensional features of classification fits better to DSM-IV criteria for prescription opioid abuse and dependence in adults than a categorical or dimensional approach. Research is needed to examine the utility of this mixture classification for substance use disorders and treatment response.

Keywords

DSM-IVfactor mixture modelitem response theorylatent class analysesnosologyprescription opioid use disorders
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , March 2011 , pp. 653 - 664
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

APA (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn, text revision. American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Beseler, C, Jacobson, KC, Kremen, WS, Lyons, MJ, Glatt, SJ, Faraone, SV, Gillespie, NA, Tsuang, MT (2006). Is there heterogeneity among syndromes of substance use disorder for illicit drugs? Addictive Behaviors 31, 929–947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, MW, Cudeck, R (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing Structural Equation Models (ed. Bollen, K. A. and Long, J. S.), pp. 136–162. Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
Bucholz, KK, Heath, AC, Reich, T, Hesselbrock, VM, Kramer, JR, Nurnberger, Jr. JI, Schuckit, MA (1996). Can we subtype alcoholism? A latent class analysis of data from relatives of alcoholics in a multicenter family study of alcoholism. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 20, 1462–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feingold, A, Rounsaville, B (1995). Construct validity of the dependence syndrome as measured by DSM-IV for different psychoactive substances. Addiction 90, 1661–1669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillespie, NA, Neale, MC, Prescott, CA, Aggen, SH, Kendler, KS (2007). Factor and item-response analysis DSM-IV criteria for abuse of and dependence on cannabis, cocaine, hallucinogens, sedatives, stimulants and opioids. Addiction 102, 920–930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helzer, JE, Bucholz, KK, Gossop, M (2007). A dimensional option for the diagnosis of substance dependence in DSM-V. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 16 (Suppl. 1), S24–S33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, L, Bentler, PM (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosten, TR, Rounsaville, BJ, Babor, TF, Spitzer, RL, Williams, JB (1987). Substance-use disorders in DSM-III-R. Evidence for the dependence syndrome across different psychoactive substances. British Journal of Psychiatry 151, 834–843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuo, PH, Aggen, SH, Prescott, CA, Kendler, KS, Neale, MC (2008). Using a factor mixture modeling approach in alcohol dependence in a general population sample. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 98, 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupfer, DJ, Regier, DA, Kuhl, EA (2008). On the road to DSM-V and ICD-11. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 258 (Suppl. 5), 2–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langenbucher, JW, Labouvie, E, Martin, CS, Sanjuan, PM, Bavly, L, Kirisci, L, Chung, T (2004). An application of item response theory analysis to alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine criteria in DSM-IV. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 113, 72–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lo, Y, Mendell, NR, Rubin, DB (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika 88, 778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynskey, MT, Agrawal, A (2007). Psychometric properties of DSM assessments of illicit drug abuse and dependence: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Psychological Medicine 37, 1345–1355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manchikanti, L (2007). National drug control policy and prescription drug abuse: facts and fallacies. Pain Physician 10, 399–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, J, Langenbucher, J, Labouvie, EW (1994). The generalizability of the dependence syndrome across substances: an examination of some properties of the proposed DSM-IV dependence criteria. Addiction 89, 1105–1113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthén, B (2006). Should substance use disorders be considered as categorical or dimensional? Addiction 101 (Suppl. 1), 6–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthén, B, Asparouhov, T (2006). Item response mixture modeling: application to tobacco dependence criteria. Addictive Behaviors 31, 1050–1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthén, BO, Muthén, LK (2007). Mplus: Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables (Version 5.2). Muthén and Muthén Inc.: Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Nelson, CB, Rehm, J, Ustün, TB, Grant, B, Chatterji, S (1999). Factor structures for DSM-IV substance disorder criteria endorsed by alcohol, cannabis, cocaine and opioid users: results from the WHO reliability and validity study. Addiction 94, 843–855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nylund, KL, Asparouhov, T, Muthén, B (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling. A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 14, 535–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proudfoot, H, Baillie, AJ, Teesson, M (2006). The structure of alcohol dependence in the community. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 81, 21–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAMHSA (2008). Results from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies: Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
SAMHSA (2009). Results from the 2008 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies: Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
Schatzberg, AF (2010). Why is DSM-5 being delayed? Psychiatric News 45, 3.Google Scholar
SUDAAN (2006). SUDAAN User's Manual, Release 9.0. Research Triangle Institute: Research Triangle Park, NC.Google Scholar
Teesson, M, Lynskey, M, Manor, B, Baillie, A (2002). The structure of DSM-IV cannabis use disorders in the community. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 68, 255–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, CF, Ku, L, Rogers, SM, Lindberg, LD, Pleck, JH, Sonenstein, FL (1998). Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science 280, 867–873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, LT, Blazer, DG, Patkar, AA, Stitzer, ML, Wakim, PG, Brooner, RK (2009 a). Heterogeneity of stimulant dependence: a National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network study. American Journal on Addictions 18, 206–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, LT, Pan, JJ, Blazer, DG, Tai, B, Brooner, RK, Stitzer, ML, Patkar, AA, Blaine, JD (2009 b). The construct and measurement equivalence of cocaine and opioid dependences: a National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 103, 114–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, LT, Pilowsky, DJ, Patkar, AA (2008 a). Non-prescribed use of pain relievers among adolescents in the United States. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 94, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, LT, Ringwalt, CL, Mannelli, P, Patkar, AA (2008 b). Prescription pain reliever abuse and dependence among adolescents: a nationally representative study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 47, 1020–1029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, LT, Ringwalt, CL, Yang, C, Reeve, BB, Pan, JJ, Blazer, DG (2009 c). Construct and differential item functioning in the assessment of prescription opioid use disorders among American adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 48, 563–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zacny, J, Bigelow, G, Compton, P, Foley, K, Iguchi, M, Sannerud, C (2003). College on Problems of Drug Dependence taskforce on prescription opioid non-medical use and abuse: position statement. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 69, 215–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed