Petrie et al (Psychiatric Bulletin, 2004, 27, 180–182) identify many of the negative aspects of conducting research as a trainee. However, an opportunity has been missed to examine the type of research being conducted and trainees’ opinions on the positive aspects of doing research. In our opinion, research taught us more about juggling competing demands, negotiating skills, ethical dilemmas and organisational competence than any other experience as a psychiatric trainee. If research sessions were used for another purpose (as more than half the responders wished) this valuable training opportunity would be lost. A consultant needs much more than just clinical skills.
Further, using successful publication as an outcome measure of research sessions ignores the many other benefits research can provide. To those benefits noted above should be added the understanding of the process of project development, increased knowledge in the area of study, an appreciation of the demands of academic and clinical roles and transferable skills such as information technology, writing skills and independent working (Reference Hull and GuthrieHull & Guthrie, 2000). We had both finished our training before definitive publications in major journals were published, but neither felt our time had been wasted.
Interesting findings in this survey include the relatively small numbers of trainees who had difficulties recruiting subjects (10, 31%) and funding (4, 12%). As both issues tend to be problematic for even the most experienced and battle-hardened researcher is this a reflection of the sort of studies being conducted? Of course, to participate in larger studies would include the attendant risk of delayed or indeed no publication!
Declaration of interest
A.M.H. and M.G. both undertook full-time research placements as higher trainees.
Open access
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.