Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:33:04.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Points in response to letter from Dr Lucas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Cornelius Katona
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Columns
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , March 2003 , pp. 116
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2003

I agree entirely with Dr Lucas that SHOs need and deserve an effective voice within our College. We have two mechanisms in place to achieve this. The Inceptorship scheme is open to all trainees intending to take the MRCPsych examination and puts them in contact with the College, provides them with free or subsidised subscription to the College Journals and gives them regular information about relevant College events. In addition, SHOs form an important part of the Collegiate Trainee Committee (TC) membership. Through the CTC, SHOs (as well as specialist registrars) are represented on all key College committees.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.