Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:53:15.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perverse incentives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Mike Cooper*
Affiliation:
General Adult Psychiatry, Rotherham District General Hospital
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2004

Whether or not the incentive to be able to retire early from what your survey confirms to be an overworked and undervalued profession is ‘ perverse’ (Psychiatric Bulletin, April 2004, 28, 130-132) is a matter for debate. Nevertheless, many psychiatrists will undoubtedly have taken it into account when choosing their career. More to the point, many mental health officers (MHOs) will have made important financial planning decisions based upon a ‘guarantee by law’ (A guide to the National Health Service (NHS) pensions scheme, National Health Service Pensions Agency, 2001) that such an entitlement will remain in place. Given that there may be moves by the government to change the law and hence remove such a guarantee, do the authors not consider it unwise to describe what many consider to be one of the few ‘perks’ of psychiatry in such a way?

Given the substantial financial incentives of non-NHS work, have the authors not considered the potentially disastrous consequences for an already strained profession that the removal of MHO status might lead to?

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.