Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:34:48.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The moral case against psychotherapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Bruce G. Charlton
Bruce G. Charlton*
Affiliation:
Anatomy Department, Glasgow University, G12 8QQ, Scotland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

First of all, some definitions. In general, psychotherapy is what happens when a doctor speaks to a patient. More specifically, psychotherapy is talk as therapy: it involves the physician assuming a role of expertise in talking.

Type
Personal view
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 15 , Issue 8 , August 1991 , pp. 490 - 492
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1991

References

Keller, H. (1987) Criticism. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Skrabanek, P. & Mccormick, J. (1989) Follies and Fallacies in Medicine. Glasgow: Tarragon.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.