Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:30:58.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Missed-fit ECT audit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Mayura Deshpande  and
Tegwedd Freer
Tegwedd Freer
Affiliation:
Wonford House Hospital, Dryden Road, Exeter EX2 5AF
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
The Columns
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 26 , Issue 7 , July 2002 , pp. 275
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2002. The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Sir: We read with interest the article by Davies and Wilson (Psychiatric Bulletin, June 2001, 25, 215-216) on the rate of missed-fits during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). We have recently completed a retrospective survey of the missed-fit rate in our hospital's ECT department. Of the 70 patients who received ECT between January and December 2001, case notes were obtained for 68. Eighty per cent of the patients were on antidepressants, 47% on antipsychotics, 19% on benzodiazepines and 3% on antiepileptic drugs, and no medication was recorded for one patient.

The total number of ECT treatments given was 481. Of these, only five resulted in missed-fits. These patients were not on benzodiazepines or antiepileptic drugs. The stimulus dose applied in all five cases was appropriate to the patients' age and gender. All of them went on to fit successfully later in the course. In addition, different junior doctors were involved in the administration of ECT on the above occasions.

The rate of missed-fits in our survey was very low, 1.04%, which is comparable with the rate reported by the authors (1.8%) in their third audit-year. Our ECT department is consultant-led, with theoretical teaching and clinical supervision, as well as random checks to ensure that correct procedures are followed. A stimulus-dosing protocol is strictly adhered to.

As a result of this survey, restimulation guidelines are being drafted and will be included in ECT dosing policy. It is also proposed that this survey will become an annual event in our department.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.