Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:29:54.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mental illness and the media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Paul Crichton
Paul Crichton*
Affiliation:
Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
The Columns
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 24 , Issue 12 , December 2000 , pp. 469
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2000, The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Sir: In ‘Mental illness and the media’ (Psychiatric Bulletin, 24, 345-346) Jim Bolton is right to point out that psychiatrists should not simply blame the media for stigmatising mental illness, but should learn how to communicate successfully with the media themselves. I would add two points. First, psychiatric patients should also be encouraged to communicate more effectively with the media: the message is more powerful if it comes from them as well rather than just from us. Second, psychiatrists themselves are in part to blame for the stigma of mental illness in their choice of diagnostic terms, for example ‘schizophrenia’, which is widely taken to mean ‘split personality’ and is associated, at least in some people's minds, with unpredictable violence (Reference CrichtonCrichton, 2000).

References

Crichton, P. (2000) A profound duplicity of life uses and misuses of ‘schizophrenia’ in popular culture and professional diagnosis. Times Literary Supplement, March 31.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.