Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:54:27.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Journal clubs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

M. Acevedo ,
H. Bullen ,
M. Kehoe  and
N. Walker
M. Acevedo
Affiliation:
Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital, Aberdeen
H. Bullen
Affiliation:
Shenavall Centre, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness
M. Kehoe
Affiliation:
Royal Cornhill Hospital, Aberdeen
N. Walker
Affiliation:
Ravenscraig Hospital, Greenock
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Columns
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , February 2004 , pp. 66
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2004

Journal clubs are integral to psychiatric training (Reference AlguireAlguire, 1998). Their objectives include teaching critical appraisal and presentation skills, keeping up with medical literature and improving practice. Participants also value trainees and trainers working together.

We hold evidence-based journal clubs similar to those described by Walker (Psychiatric Bulletin, June Reference Walker2001, 25, 237). To assess them, we measured attendance, and determined whether critical appraisal was practised and what priority participants placed on its teaching. From September 2001 to March 2002, 12 of 13 scheduled sessions took place, with 19 papers (of 26 possible) presented. Median attendance was 25, comprising SHOs (44% of the audience), SpRs (20%), consultants (17%) and others (19%). Each presenter included critical comments, but not systematic appraisal. Most discussion focused on the general topic rather than appraising the specific article presented. Consultants made most contributions to discussion (71%), SHOs the least (8%). Interviewed afterwards, presenters valued the opportunity to discuss topics of interest, rehearse critical appraisal skills and practise presentation.

Following the study period, a focus group of SHOs identified key aspects of the journal club process and in a questionnaire to all SHOs (return rate 77%), top priority went to critical appraisal skills. Learning about the topic presented and practising presentation were secondary priorities. These findings were presented to all journal club participants to discuss development options. Although the need to learn critical appraisal skills was widely recognised, a purely critical appraisal journal club was considered too constrained and lacking interest. Critical appraisal skills may be taught in special sessions. The popularity of journal clubs (measured by attendance) suggests that staff enjoy them. They value being updated on and discussing areas of practice and practising presentation skills. These positive values may be lost with a more rigid focus on critical appraisal skills.

Footnotes

Declaration of interest

This study was funded by a grant from Grampian Primary Care NHS Trust.

References

Alguire, P. C. (1998) A review of journal clubs in postgraduate medical education. Journal of General and Internal Medicine, 13, 347–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, N. P. (2001) Evidence-based journal clubs and the Critical Review Paper (letter). Psychiatric Bulletin, 25, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.