Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T05:49:03.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The future for psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

John Reed
John Reed*
Affiliation:
Mental Health, The Elderly and Disabled Division, Department of Health, 133–135 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8UG
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Policy for mental health services in England is based on two straightforward principles. These are, first that care should be provided as locally to where a person lives as is reasonably possible, and secondly that treatment should be available in the least restrictive conditions that are compatible with the safety of the patient, of those looking after him and of the public at large. I make no apology for reviewing the history of policy and practice; it is not possible to understand the mental health services that we are trying to achieve for the future without understanding how the service has developed over the years. I shall use the mental illness service as an example – similar considerations apply to the mental handicap services.

Type
Articles
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 15 , Issue 7 , July 1991 , pp. 396 - 401
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1991

References

Coid, J. (1988a) Mentally abnormal remands I: rejected or accepted by the National Health Service. British Medical Journal, 296, 1779–1782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coid, J. (1988b) Mentally abnormal remands II: comparison of services provided by Oxford and Wessex region. British Medical Journal, 296, 1783–1784.Google Scholar
Croft-Jefferies, C. & Wilkinson, G. (1989) Costs of neurotic illness in UK general practice in 1985. Psychological Medicine, 19, 549–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health (1990a) The Care Programme Approach for People with a Mental Illness. HC (90)23/LASSL (90)11.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1990b) Specific Grant for the Development of Social Care Services for People with a Mental Illness. HC (90)24/LAC (90)10.Google Scholar
Fowles, A. J. (1991 in press) The Mentally Abnormal Offender in the Era of Community Care: New Directions in Provision. (ed. A. Grounds). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. & Huxley, P. (1980) Mental illness in the Community: The Pathway to Psychiatric Care. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Hoffenberg, R. (1986) ‘Clinical Freedom$’ p. ix–x. Rock Carling Fellowship, Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. (1990) Towards a system of outcome indicators for mental health care. British Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 500–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnstone, A. & Goldberg, D. (1976) Psychiatric screening and general practice. Lancet, i, 705–708.Google Scholar
Timms, P. & Fry, A. H. (1989) Homelessness and mental illness. Health Trends, 21, 70–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Tooth, G. C. & Brooke, E. M. (1961) Trends in the mental hospital population and their effect on future planning. Lancet, i, 710–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.