Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:19:03.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Facilities for mentally impaired patients: three years experience of a semi-secure unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Janet Mayor ,
Milan Bhate ,
Hugh Firth ,
Anne Graham ,
Pam Knox  and
Stephen Tyrer
Stephen Tyrer
Affiliation:
Prudhoe Hospital, Prudhoe, Northumberland NE42 5NT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Working Party on Security in NHS Hospitals (The Glancy Report, DHSS, 1974a) and the interim report of The Butler Committee (DHSS, 1974b) both recommended that secure provision should be made available for the treatment of mentally disordered patients who required greater security than could be provided in a standard hospital setting. They recommended that patients with mild or borderline mental handicap should be treated together with the mentally ill but that “severely subnormal patients” should be treated separately. Later the Royal College of Psychiatrists (1981) largely endorsed this advice proposing that:

  1. (a) individuals with borderline and mild mental handicap could be adequately treated in the secure units for mentally ill individuals

  2. (b) individuals with moderate mental handicap needed a special secure facility

  3. (c) individuals with severe mental handicap did not need high security, and should be managed in high-staffed wards in mental handicap hospitals.

Type
Articles
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 14 , Issue 6 , June 1990 , pp. 333 - 335
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1990

References

Department of Health and Social Security (1974a) Security in NHS Hospitals for the Mentally Ill and the Mentally Handicapped (Glancy Report). London: DHSS.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1974b) The Interim Report of the Committee on Mentally Abnormal Offenders (Butler Report) Cmnd 5698. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Grounds, A. T. (1987) Detention of psychopathic disorder patients in Special Hospitals: Critical issues. British Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 474–478.Google Scholar
Murphy, G., Holland, A. & Fowler, P. (in press). MIETS: A service option for people with mild learning disability and challenging behaviour or psychiatric problems. Mental Handicap Research. Google Scholar
Oxford Regional Health Authority (1976) A Survey of the Need for Secure Psychiatric Facilities in the Oxford Region. Oxford: Oxford Regional Health Authority.Google Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists (1981) Secure Facilities for Psychiatric Patients - A Comprehensive Policy. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.