Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:03:33.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Drug Interventions Programme: clinical profile of service users v. attendees of standard services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Christos Kouimtsidis ,
Jo Edwards ,
Christine Wallis  and
Karen Drabble
Christos Kouimtsidis
Affiliation:
Section of Addictive Behaviour, Division of Mental Health, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, e-mail: [email protected]
Christine Wallis
Affiliation:
Clinical Team, Drug Interventions Programme, Hertfordshire Partnership Trust
Karen Drabble
Affiliation:
North-West Herts Community Drug and Alcohol Team, Hertfordshire Partnership Trust
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims and Method

We conducted a retrospective survey of all cases referred to the Drug Interventions Programme in Hertfordshire for the first 9 months in order to compare them with those referred to one of the community drug and alcohol teams.

Results

The Drugs Interventions Programme had significantly more White British clients and clients who had dropped out from previous treatment. Compared with community team clients, the Programme had a higher percentage of clients with an opioid problem (92%), of whom a high percentage also misused other substances (78%) and injected drugs (30%, half of whom shared needles).

Clinical Implications

More chaotic clients who had failed previous treatment have entered treatment with the Drug Interventions Programme.

Type
Original papers
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 32 , Issue 7 , July 2008 , pp. 245 - 247
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2008

References

Gossop, M., Marsden, J., Stewart, D., et al (2000) Reductions in acquisitive crime and drug use after treatment of addiction problems: 1-year follow-up outcome. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 58, 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, W., Bell, J. & Curless, J. (1993) Crime and drug use among applicants for methadone maintenance. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 31, 123–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kouimtsidis, C., Reynolds, M. & Asamoah, V. (2007) Treatment or prison: service user and staff experience of drug treatment and testing orders in Hertfordshire. Psychiatric Bulletin, 31, 463–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singleton, N., Pendry, E., Taylor, C., et al (2003) Drug Related Mortality Among Newly Released Prisoners, p.187. Home Office.Google Scholar
Stein, L. I. & Test, M. A. (1980) Alternative to mental hospital treatment. Conceptual model, treatment program, and clinical evaluation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 392–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UK700 Group (2000) Cost-effectiveness of intensive v. standard case management for severe psychotic illness: UK700 case management trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 537–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.