Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-03T05:46:12.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communication between GPs and psychiatrists: the long and short of it

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Andrew Blakey ,
Jessica Morgan  and
Ian Anderson
Andrew Blakey
Affiliation:
Withington Hospital, Manchester
Jessica Morgan
Affiliation:
Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport
Ian Anderson*
Affiliation:
Rawnsley Building, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL
*
∗Correspondence
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Good communication between general practitioners (GPs) and psychiatrists is important. An audit of new patient referral letters from GPs and the first assessment letter in reply from psychiatrists found that GP letters were short (mean 106 words) with limited information which increased with letter length. Psychiatrist's letters were longer (mean 849 words), of a high quality but with a negative relationship between length and information score. Use of the ‘preferred’ format derived from previous research was associated with shorter letters of higher quality. Communication between GPs and psychiatrists might be improved if GPs wrote more and psychiatrists wrote less.

Type
Original Papers
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 21 , Issue 10 , October 1997 , pp. 622 - 624
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

References

Blaney, D. & Pullen, I. M. (1989) Communication between psychiatrists and general practioners: what style of letters do psychiatrists prefer? Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 39, 67.Google Scholar
Margo, L. (1982) Letters from psychiatrists to general practitioners. Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 6, 139–141.Google Scholar
Naik, P. C. & Lee, A. S. (1993) Communication between GPs and psychiatrists (letter). British Medical Journal, 306, 1070.Google Scholar
Pether, R. G., Johnson, B. A., O'Donoghue, G., et al (1993) Psychiatrists letters to general practitioners: choosing the right format. Psychiatric Bulletin, 17, 414–415.Google Scholar
Prasher, V. P., Fitzmaurice, D., Krishnan, V. H. R., et al (1992) Communication between general practitioners and psychiatrists. Psychiatric Bulletin, 16, 468–469.Google Scholar
Pullen, I. M. & Yellowlees, A. J. (1985) Is communication improving between general practitioners and psychiatrists? British Medical Bulletin, 290, 31–33.Google Scholar
Solomon, J. K., Maxwell, R. B. H. & Hopkins, A. P. (1995) Content of a discharge summary from a medical ward: views of general practitioners and hospital doctors. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 29, 307–310.Google Scholar
Williams, P. & Wallace, B. B. (1974) General practitioners and psychiatrists – do they communicate? British Medical Journal, 1, 505–507.Google Scholar
Yellowlees, A. J. & Pullen, I. M. (1984) Communication improving between general practitioners and psychiatrists. What sort of letters should psychiatrists write? Health Bulletin, 42, 285–296.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.